Intentional bilingualism (IB) refers to caregivers’ deliberate, planned introduction of an additional language at home—beyond what community exposure alone would provide—and is characterized by caregivers’ use of their non-native language with the child. While scholarly debate continues about whether IB affects first-language (L1) outcomes, evidence on morphosyntax specifically remains limited. Therefore, we examined L1 morphosyntax using the short version of the Polish sentence repetition (SRep) task.
Methods:
Seventy-one children aged 5 years 0 months–6 years 11 months (IB = 23; community-induced bilingualism, CommBil = 24; monolinguals, Mono = 24), matched on age and gender, completed the 20-item Polish SRep task. We also collected the Cross-Linguistic Lexical Task (CLT) and nonverbal reasoning (RCPM) data. Data were analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects models including group and sentence structure as fixed effects.
Results:
IB children performed similarly to monolinguals on the SRep task. By contrast, the CommBil group scored lower than both IB children and monolinguals.
Conclusions:
Within the scope of this study, IB was not associated with disadvantages in L1 morphosyntax. The lower SRep performance observed in the CommBil group may reflect differences in input quality/quantity rather than an inherent “bilingualism cost.”
Alarcón UtreraA. B.Nieto Moreno de DiezmasE. (2023). Speaking in nobody’s mother tongue: English immersion at home as a family language policy. Ampersand, 11, 100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100135
Armon-LotemS.MeirN. (2019). The nature of exposure and input in early bilingualism. In De HouwerA.OrtegaL. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism (pp. 193–212). Cambridge University Press.
4.
BanasikN.HamanE.SmoczyńskaM. (2012). Sentence Repetition Task [Unpublished material]. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
5.
BenmamounE.MontrulS.PolinskyM. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4).
6.
BialystokE. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In KrollJ. F.De GrootA. M. B. (Eds.), Lexical access in bilingual production. Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 417–432). Oxford University Press.
7.
BialystokE. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477
8.
BialystokE.CraikF. I.LukG. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
9.
BialystokE.CraikF. I. M.KleinR.ViswanathanM. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290
10.
BialystokE.ShorbagiS. H. (2021). Subtle increments in socioeconomic status and bilingualism jointly affect children’s verbal and nonverbal performance. Journal of Cognition and Development, 22(3), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2021.1901711
11.
BloomE. (2010). Effects of input on the early grammatical development of bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(4), 422–446.
12.
BockJ. K.LeveltW. (1994). Sentence production (GernsbacherM., Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
BritoN. H. (2017). Influence of the home linguistic environment on early language development. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(2), 155–162.
14.
Buil-LegazL.Aguilar-MediavillaE.Rodríguez-FerreiroJ. (2016). Oral morphosyntactic competence as a predictor of reading comprehension in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12217
15.
CalvoA.BialystokE. (2014). Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition, 130(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.015
ChiatS.PolišenskáK. (2016). A framework for crosslinguistic nonword repetition tests: Effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on children’s performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0293
20.
Conti-RamsdenG.BottingN.FaragherB. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(6), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00770
Curdt-ChristiansenX. L.HuangJ. (2020). Factors influencing family language policy. In Handbook of social and affective factors in home language maintenance and development (pp. 174–193). De Gruyter Mouton.
23.
DarcyN. T. (1953). A review of the literature on the effects of bilingualism upon the measurement of intelligence. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 82(1), 21–57.
24.
De BotK.Van der HoevenN. (2011). Language and aging. In SimpsonJ. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 124–137). Taylor & Francis e-Library.
25.
De CatC. (2021). Socioeconomic status as a proxy for input quality in bilingual children?Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(2), 301–324.
26.
de DiezmasE. N. M.UtreraA. A. (2022). Intensive parenting and elective bilingualism English/Spanish in Spanish monolingual families: From language ideologies to practice. In Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras (pp. 133–149). Universidad de Granada.
27.
De HouwerA. (2007). Parental language input patterns and children’s bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070221
DuursmaE.Romero-ContrerasS.SzuberA.ProctorP.SnowC.AugustD.CalderónM. (2007). The role of home literacy and language environment on bilinguals’ English and Spanish vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406070093
30.
EspinosaL. M. (2015). Challenges and benefits of early bilingualism in the US context. Global Education Review, 2(1).
31.
FillmoreL. W. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6(3), 323–346.
32.
FoxR.CorretjerO.WebbK. (2019). Benefits of foreign language learning and bilingualism: An analysis of published empirical research 2012–2019. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 699–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12424
33.
García GonzálezE.LiuL.LanzaE. (2024). Language in multilingual families during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: A survey of challenges and opportunities. Multilingua, 43(2), 163–190.
34.
GathercoleV. C. M.ThomasE. M.RobertsE.HughesC.HughesE. K. (2013). Why assessment needs to take exposure into account: Vocabulary and grammatical abilities in bilingual children. In Issues in the assessment of bilinguals (pp. 20–55). Multilingual Matters.
HamanE.ŁuniewskaM.PomiechowskaB. (2015). Designing cross-linguistic lexical tasks (CLTs) for bilingual preschool children. In Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 196–240). Multilingual Matters.
37.
HamanE.WodnieckaZ.MareckaM.SzewczykJ.Białecka-PikulM.OtwinowskaA.MieszkowskaK.ŁuniewskaM.KołakJ.MiękiszA.KacprzakA.BanasikN.Foryś-NogalaM. (2017). How does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? Evidence from Polish-English migrants to the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01444
38.
HoffE. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1), 55–88.
39.
HoffE.CoreC.PlaceS.RumicheR.SeñorM.ParraM. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39(1), 1–27.
40.
HurajováA. (2012). Bilingualism-blessing or curse? Some considerations concerning the possible negative effects of bilingualism and prejudices against bilingualism. In Humanities across the borders (pp. 185–199). Donetsk–Trnava: Donetsk National University, University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava.
41.
HurajovaA. (2020). The phenomenon of bilingualism in Slovakia: Raising a bilingual child in a monolingual culture–a family case study on intentional bilingualism as a communication strategy. In Gómez-ParraM.Huertas AbrilC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on bilingual and intercultural education (pp. 338–357). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2588-3.ch014
42.
JagiełaZ. (2022). Intentional bilingualism in the Polish context. In Journeys through cultures and languages. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Nauk Stosowanych w Nowym Sączu.
43.
JaworowskaA.SzustrowaT. (2010). Raven’s progressive matrices: Standard, classical, parallel and plus versions. Polish standardization. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
44.
Jurančič-PetekK. (2017). Language-only or intentional bilingualism: The benefit of choice. Maribor International Review, 5(1), 1–16.
45.
KaragözS.ErdemirN. (2022). Reasons, views and practices of nonnative parents towards raising bilingual children. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(3), 1341–1358. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1128681
46.
KarpavaS.ZabrodskajaA.RitterA.MeirN.RingblomN. (2025). Multilingual dynamics: Exploring English as a third language in Russian-speaking families across Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Israel, and Sweden. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46, 1569–1581.
47.
KašćelanD.PrévostP.SerratriceL.TullerL.UnsworthS.De CatC. (2022). A review of questionnaires quantifying bilingual experience in children: Do they document the same constructs?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000390
48.
Kayadibli-OğuzS.Çamlıbel-AcarZ. (2024). A case of early intentional bilingualism: A close examination of context and practices. Journal of Elementary Education, 17(Spec.Iss), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.4581
KingK. A.FogleL. W. (2006). Bilingual parenting as good parenting: Parents’ perspectives on family language policy for additive bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(6), 695–712. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb362.0
KingK. A.FogleL. W. (2013). Family language policy and bilingual parenting. Language Teaching, 46(2), 172–194.
53.
KohnertK. (2010). Bilingual children with primary language impairment: Issues, evidence and implications for clinical actions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(6), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.02.002
54.
KomeiliM.MarshallC. R. (2013). Sentence repetition as a measure of morphosyntax in monolingual and bilingual children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2012.751625
55.
LarssonK.Björk-WillénP.HaraldssonK.HanssonK. (2023). Children’s use of English as lingua franca in Swedish preschools. Multilingua, 42(4), 527–557.
MeirN. (2018). Morpho-syntactic abilities of unbalanced bilingual children: A closer look at the weaker language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01318
60.
MeirN.Armon-LotemS. (2017). Independent and combined effects of socioeconomic status (SES) and bilingualism on children’s vocabulary and verbal short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1442.
61.
MieszkowskaK.KrajewskiG.ŁuniewskaM.OrzeszekD.BanasikN.KuśK.OtwinowskaA.HamanE. (2021). Kwestionariusz dla rodziców dzieci jedno- i wielojęzycznych: Dzieci przedszkolne i starsze [Questionnaire for parents of monolingual and multilingual children: Preschool and older children]. Unpublished material. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
62.
MieszkowskaK.ŁuniewskaM.KołakJ.KacprzakA.WodnieckaZ.HamanE. (2017). Home language will not take care of itself: Vocabulary knowledge in trilingual children in the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1358.
63.
MontrulS. (2016). Dominance and proficiency in early and late bilingualism. In Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 15–35). Cambridge University Press.
64.
MuszyńskaK.KrajewskiG.DynakA.GarmannN. G.RomørenA. S. H.ŁuniewskaM.AlcockK.KatsosN.KołakJ.Gram SimonsenH.HansenP.KrysztofiakM.SobotaK.HamanE. (2025). Bilingual children reach early language milestones at the same age as monolingual peers. Journal of Child Language. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000655
65.
ParadisJ. (2010). Bilingual children’s acquisition of English verb morphology: Effects of language exposure, structure complexity, and task type. Language Learning, 60(3), 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00567.x
66.
PealE.LambertM. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs, 76(546), 1–23.
67.
PhamG.EbertK. D. (2020). Diagnostic accuracy of sentence repetition and nonword repetition for developmental language disorder in Vietnamese. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00366
68.
PillerI. (2001). Private language planning. Estudios de sociolingüistica, 2(1), 61–80.
69.
PolišenskáK.ChiatS.RoyP. (2015). Sentence repetition: What does the task measure?International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12126
PotterM. C.LombardiL. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2546
72.
PrattA. S.PeñaE. D.BedoreL. M. (2021). Sentence repetition with bilinguals with and without DLD: Differential effects of memory, vocabulary, and exposure. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000498
73.
PrzygockaS.Banasik-JemielniakN.SmoczyńskaM.HamanE. (2020). Zadanie Powtarzania Zdań–wersja krótka. Polska adaptacja LITMUS Sentence Repetition Task. Materiał niepublikowany. Wydział Psychologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego [Sentence Repetition Task—short version: Polish adaptation of the LITMUS Sentence Repetition Task]. Unpublished manuscript. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
74.
QuirozB. G.SnowC. E.ZhaoJ. (2010). Vocabulary skills of Spanish—English bilinguals: Impact of mother—Child language interactions and home language and literacy support. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(4), 379–399.
75.
ReuterskioldC.HallinA.NairV.HanssonK. (2021). Morphosyntactic challenges for Swedish-speaking children with developmental language disorder in comparison with L1 and L2 peers. Applied Linguistics, 42. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa058
76.
RoweM. L.SnowC. E. (2020). Analyzing input quality along three dimensions: Interactive, linguistic, and conceptual. Journal of Child Language, 47(1).
SalomoneR. (2012). Multilingualism and multiculturalism: Transatlantic discourses on language, identity, and immigrant schooling. Notre Dame Law Review, 87, 2031–2062.
79.
SaundersG. (1982). Bilingual children: Guidance for the family. Multilingual Matters.
80.
SeoY. (2020). An emerging trend in English education in Korea: “Maternal English education” (eommapyo yeongeo): Challenges and strategies in raising a bilingual child as a nonnative speaker. English Today, 37(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078420000048
81.
SeoY. (2022). Bilingual myths and challenges of bilingual parenting as nonnative English speakers. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23, 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09772-7
82.
SmolikF.MatiasovitsováK. (2021). Sentence imitation with masked morphemes in Czech: Memory, morpheme frequency, and morphological richness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00370
TullerL. (2015). Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In Armon-LotemS.JongJ. D.MeirN. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 301–330). Multilingual Matters.
UnsworthS. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000284
90.
UnsworthS.BrouwerS.De BreeE.VerhagenJ. (2019). Predicting bilingual preschoolers’ patterns of language development: Degree of non-native input matters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(5), 1189–1219.
91.
ValdésG. (2005). Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized?Modern Language Journal, 89, 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00314.x
92.
ValdésG.FigueroaR. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Ablex Publishing.
93.
van DijkC.DijkstraT.UnsworthS. (2022). Cross-linguistic influence during online sentence processing in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(4), 691–704.
94.
van DijkC.van WonderenE.KoutamanisE.KootstraG. J.DijkstraT.UnsworthS. (2022). Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Language, 49(5), 897–929. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000337
95.
VozníkováJ. (2021). Intentional bilingualism of a Slovak child regularly exposed to English. Jazyk a kultúra, 47–48, 95–114.
96.
WinslerA.DíazR. M.EspinosaL.RodriguezJ. L. (1999). When learning a second language does not mean losing the first: Bilingual language development in low-income, Spanish-speaking children attending bilingual preschool. Child Development, 70, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00026
97.
YurtseverA.AndersonJ. A. E.GrundyJ. G. (2023). Bilingual children outperform monolingual children on executive function tasks far more often than chance: An updated quantitative analysis. Developmental Review, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2023.101084
