Restructuring dynamic mapping of L1 resources in L2 development with bilingual metacognitive instruction: The case of sentence stress

Abstract

Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions:

This study aims to investigate the role of metacognition in regulating bilingual speakers’ dynamic use of linguistic resources across languages. In particular, it examines how first language (L1) and second language (L2) metacognition influence Mandarin-speaking L2 English learners’ development of sentence stress.

Design/methodology/approach:

Forty-eight high-proficiency Mandarin-speaking L2 English learners were randomly assigned to four groups with different instructional conditions: (1) imitation-repetition with no metacognitive components, (2) monolingual metacognitive instruction in L2, (3) bilingual metacognitive instruction bridging L1 and L2, and (4) control group. Each participant took a pretest, a posttest, and a 2-week delayed posttest to evaluate their use of sentence stress in both control and extemporaneous conditions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after the instruction.

Data and analysis:

Six trained native English-speaking raters assessed the perceivability and placement of sentence stress using 9-point Likert-type scales. Acoustic measures of pitch range, pitch height, duration, and intensity were extracted via a speech analysis software program. Quantitative data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. The interview data were examined through a thematic analysis.

Findings/conclusions:

Both monolingual and bilingual metacognitive instructions facilitated learners’ sentence stress development in a controlled, read-aloud task. However, only participants receiving bilingual metacognitive instruction demonstrated statistically significant improvement in extemporaneous speech and reported spontaneous use of sentence stress in everyday communication.

Originality:

This is the first study to systematically investigate how L1 and L2 metacognition influence the development of sentence stress. It is also the first study to provide empirical support for bilingual metacognitive instruction in L2 pronunciation instruction.

Significance/implications:

This study highlights the foundational and multidimensional role of metacognition in bilinguals’ regulation of linguistic resources across languages. It also provides empirical support for bilingual and multilingual pedagogical practices that leverage learners’ full linguistic repertoires as resources in second language acquisition (SLA).

Keywords

Bilingualism metacognition second language pronunciation sentence stress linear mixed-effects model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.

Boersma

(2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9), 341–345.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chen

Gussenhoven

(2008). Emphasis and tonal implementation in standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 724–746.

Clennell

(1997). Raising the pedagogic status of discourse intonation teaching. ELT Journal, 51(2), 117–125.

DeKeyser

R. M.

(2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten

Williams

(Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94–112). Routledge.

Derwing

T. M.

Munro

M. J.

Foote

J. A.

Waugh

Fleming

(2014). Opening the window on comprehensible pronunciation after 19 years: A workplace training study. Language Learning, 64(3), 526–548.

Dijkstra

Van Heuven

W. J.

(2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197.

Field

(2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423.

10.

Flavell

J. H.

(1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.

11.

Gilbert

(2014). Myth 4: Intonation is hard to teach. In Grant

(Ed.), Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 107–136). University of Michigan Press.

12.

Goh

C. C.

(2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213.

13.

Goh

C. C.

Vandergrift

(2021). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.

14.

Green

D. W.

(1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81.

15.

Green

D. W.

Abutalebi

(2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530.

16.

Hahn

L. D.

(2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223.

17.

Haukås

Å.

Bjørke

Dypedahl

. (2018). Metacognition in language learning and teaching. Taylor & Francis.

18.

M. H. K.

Cutler

(2016). Cross-language data on five types of prosodic focus. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody Conference, 2016, 330–334.

19.

M. H. K.

Cutler

(2017, August 20–24). Intonation facilitates prediction of focus even in the presence of lexical tones. In Interspeech 2017 (pp. 1218–1222). https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2450900_10/component/file_2475622/content

20.

Ito

Speer

S. R.

Beckman

M. E.

(2004). Informational status and pitch accent distribution in spontaneous dialogues in English. In Speech prosody 2004 (pp. 279–282). International Speech Communication Association. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/sp2004/sp04_279.pdf

21.

Kabagema-Bilan

López-Jiménez

Truckenbrodt

(2011). Multiple focus in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua, 121(13), 1890–1905.

22.

Kroll

J. F.

Stewart

(1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.

23.

Lee

Jang

Plonsky

(2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366.

24.

Leow

(2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 557–584.

25.

Levis

J. M.

Levis

G. M.

(2018). Teaching high-value pronunciation features: Contrastive stress for intermediate learners. The CATESOL Journal, 30(1).

26.

(2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.

27.

Liu

(2021). Prosody transfer failure despite cross-language similarities: Evidence in favor of a complex dynamic system approach in pronunciation teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(1), 38–61.

28.

Liu

Reed

(2021). Exploring the complexity of the L2 intonation system: An acoustic and eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 627316.

29.

Norris

J. M.

Ortega

(2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.

30.

Ouyang

I. C.

Kaiser

(2015). Prosody and information structure in a tone language: An investigation of Mandarin Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1–2), 57–72.

31.

Pickering

(2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255.

32.

Rahimi

Katal

(2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73–81.

33.

Raoofi

Chan

S. H.

Mukundan

Rashid

S. M.

(2014). Metacognition and second/foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 7(1), 36–49.

34.

Reed

Michaud

(2015). Intonation in research and practice: The importance of metacognition. In Reed

Levis

(Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 454–470). John Wiley & Sons.

35.

Roehr-Brackin

(2018). Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. Routledge.

36.

Rosa

O’Neil

(1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511–556.

37.

Schmidt

(1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

38.

Schmidt

(1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.

39.

Stratton

J. M.

(2022). Intentional and incidental vocabulary learning: The role of historical linguistics in the second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 106(4), 837–857.

40.

Stratton

J. M.

(2023). Explicit pronunciation instruction in the second language classroom: An acoustic analysis of German final devoicing. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 9(1), 71–102.

41.

Vandergrift

(2002). ‘It was nice to see that our predictions were right’: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 555–575.

42.

Victori

Lockhart

(1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223–234.

43.

Wang

M. C.

Haertel

G. D.

Walberg

H. J.

(1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43.

44.

Wenden

A. L.

(1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537.

45.

Wennerstrom

(1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 1–25.

46.

Yan

Calhoun

Tan

(2024, November). The role of prosody in pragmatic interpretation in Mandarin. In Proc. SpeechProsody 2024 (pp. 797–801).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.23 MB

0.02 MB