Extant research suggests that processing information in a second language (L2) affects decision-making, possibly by affecting metacognition. We hypothesized that processing in L2 will reduce the bias blind spot effect, whereby people (on average) erroneously think that they are less susceptible to biases than others.
Design/methodology/approach:
In Experiment 1, participants assessed their susceptibility and the susceptibility of others to 13 psychological and 7 economic biases, in either L1 (Polish) or L2 (English). In Experiment 2, participants assessed the 7 most severe bias blind spots from Experiment 1.
Data and analysis:
We recruited 500 participants for each experiment via Prolific (832 overall, after exclusions). The main hypothesis and moderators were tested via mixed-model regressions.
Findings/conclusions:
In Experiment 1, participants showed an overall bias blind spot, which decreased in the L2 condition, but only for psychological biases. In Experiment 2, we replicated the L2-bias blind spot attenuation effect. An exploratory analysis suggests that the effect of L2 is the result of both lower ratings of other-susceptibility and higher ratings of self-susceptibility.
Originality:
Our study provides unique insights into how L2 affects metacognition. We are the first to study how the use of L2 can attenuate the bias blind spot. Our findings provide rare support for the psychological distancing (“birds-eye view”) explanation for the foreign language effect.
Significance/implications:
Bilinguals using L2 showed some resilience to the bias blind spot, suggesting metacognition is language dependent.
AckermanR.ThompsonV. A. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004
2.
BiałekM.DomuratA.Paruzel-CzachuraM.MudaR. (2022). Limits of the foreign language effect: Intertemporal choice. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1934899
3.
BiałekM.MudaR.StewartK.NiszczotaP.PieńkoszD. (2020). Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning. Cognition, 205, 104420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104420
4.
BiałekM.Paruzel-CzachuraM.GawronskiB. (2019). Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103855
5.
CirciR.GattiD.RussoV.VecchiT. (2021). The foreign language effect on decision-making: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(4), 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01871-z
6.
CostaA.FoucartA.ArnonI.ApariciM.ApesteguiaJ. (2014). “Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition, 130(2), 236–254.
7.
De NeysW.PennycookG. (2019). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 503–509.
8.
DorisonC. A.HellerB. H. (2022). Observers penalize decision makers whose risk preferences are unaffected by loss–gain framing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fxge0001187
EdwardsK.SmithE. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.5
11.
EvansJ. S. B. T.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
12.
GeipelJ.HadjichristidisC.SurianL. (2015). The foreign language effect on moral judgment: The role of emotions and norms. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0131529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131529
13.
HadjichristidisC.GeipelJ.KeysarB. (2019). The influence of native language in shaping judgment and choice. Progress in Brain Research, 247, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.02.003
14.
HadjichristidisC.GeipelJ.SavadoriL. (2015). The effect of foreign language in judgments of risk and benefit: The role of affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000044
15.
HadjichristidisC.GeipelJ.SurianL. (2017). Breaking magic: Foreign language suppresses superstition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1371780
16.
HayakawaS.CostaA.FoucartA.KeysarB. (2016). Using a Foreign Language Changes Our Choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 791–793.
HayakawaS.LauB. K. Y.HoltzmannS.CostaA.KeysarB. (2019). On the reliability of the foreign language effect on risk-taking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817742242
19.
HayakawaS.TannenbaumD.CostaA.CoreyJ. D.KeysarB. (2017). Thinking more or feeling less? Explaining the foreign-language effect on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617720944
20.
HennigM.HütterM. (2021). Consequences, norms, or willingness to interfere: A proCNI model analysis of the foreign language effect in moral dilemma judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, 104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104148
21.
HuangH.RauP.-L. P. (2020). The first–second language influence on framing effects and loss aversion of balanced bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918813646
22.
KeysarB.HayakawaS. L.AnS. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23(6), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178
MitchellG. (2012). Revisiting truth or triviality: The external validity of research in the psychological laboratory. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 7(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611432343
MudaR.NiszczotaP.BiałekM.ConwayP. (2018). Reading dilemmas in a foreign language reduces both deontological and utilitarian response tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 321–326.
28.
MudaR.PieńkoszD.FrancisK.BiałekM. (2020). The moral foreign language effect is stable across presentation modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1930–1938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820935072
29.
MudaR.WalkerA. C.PieńkoszD.FugelsangJ. A.BiałekM. (2020). Foreign language does not affect gambling-related judgments. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(2), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09933-6
30.
PalanS.SchitterC. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
PennycookG.FugelsangJ. A.KoehlerD. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
33.
PiekkariR.OxelheimL.RandøyT. (2015). The silent board: How language diversity may influence the work processes of corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12085
34.
ProninE.KuglerM. B. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011
35.
ProninE.LinD. Y.RossL. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008
36.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.
ScopellitiI.MorewedgeC. K.McCormickE.MinH. L.LebrechtS.KassamK. S. (2015). Bias blind spot: Structure, measurement, and consequences. Management Science, 61(10), 2468–2486. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096
39.
StankovicM.BiedermannB.HamamuraT. (2022). Not all bilinguals are the same: A meta-analysis of the moral foreign language effect. Brain and Language, 227, 105082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105082
40.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
41.
WasonP. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
