Given the substantial amount of work indicating how acquiring tonal information is harder than segmental information when L2 Chinese learners were tested in tasks requiring speech perception and/or production, this study investigates whether this differential activation between segmental and tonal information extends to L2 reading.
Methodology:
Native speakers and highly proficient L2 learners of Chinese were tested in a phonological Stroop task. The participants named the ink color of the Chinese characters that were visually presented to them. The Chinese character and the ink color were manipulated such that they overlapped in both segmental and tonal information (S+T+); either segmental or tonal information (S+T– or S–T+); or no overlap at all (S–T–).
Data and Analysis:
Reaction times and accuracy data from native speakers and L2 Chinese learners were first manually marked using CheckVocal, and then they were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.
Findings:
Although native Chinese speakers showed facilitation naming the ink color when the ink color and these visually presented characters shared any phonological information (i.e., segmental and/or tonal), L2 Chinese learners showed facilitation only when segmental information was shared between the ink color and the characters, suggesting that they were not able to activate tonal information of visually presented words even though they were capable of activating segmental information.
Originality:
This is one of the first studies that uses an implicit task to test the automatic processing of segmental and tonal information during visual word recognition in highly proficient L2 Chinese learners.
Implications:
This study shows that tonal information is not automatically activated during visual word recognition even in highly proficient L2 Chinese learners. Further research is necessary to find out if suprasegmental information develops later than segmental information.
BarrD.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
3.
BurnhamD.MattockK. (2007). The perception of tones and phones. In BohnO.-S.MunroM. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 259–280). John Benjamins.
4.
CaiQ.BrysbaertM. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLOS ONE, 5, Article e10729.
ColtheartM.WoollamsA.KinoshitaS.PerryC. (1999). A position-sensitive Stroop effect: Further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 456–463.
7.
DaJ. (2004). A corpus-based study of character and bigram frequencies in Chinese e-texts and its implications for Chinese language instruction. In PuZ.XieT.XuJ. (Eds.), Studies on the theory and methodology of the digitalized Chinese teaching to foreigners: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on new technologies in teaching and learning Chinese (pp. 501–511). Tsinghua University Press.
8.
ForsterK. I.ForsterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.
9.
FrancisA.CioccaV.MaL.FennK. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268–294.
10.
GuoT.PengD.LiuY. (2005). The role of phonological activation in the visual semantic retrieval of Chinese characters. Cognition, 98, B21–B34.
11.
HanJ. I.VerdonschotR. G. (2019). Spoken-word production in Korean: A non-word masked priming and phonological Stroop task investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 901–912.
12.
HaoY. C. (2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 269–279.
13.
JiangN. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634.
14.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26.
15.
LeeY.-S.VakochD. A.WurmL. H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: Across-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 527–542.
LiC.LinC. Y.WangM.JiangN. (2013). The activation of segmental and tonal information in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 773–779.
18.
LiC.WangM.DavisJ.GuanC. Q. (2018). The role of segmental and tonal information in visual word recognition with learners of Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 42, 213–238.
19.
LiuY. H.YaoT.-C.BiN.-P.GeL. Y.ShiY. H. (Eds.) (2008). Integrated Chinese: Level l. Part 1 (3rd ed.). Cheng & Tsui Company.
20.
MalinsJ. G.JoanisseM. F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 407–420.
21.
MattinglyI. G. (1987). Morphological structure and segmental awareness. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 488–493.
22.
PelzlE.LauE. F.GuoT.DeKeyserR. (2018). Advanced second language learners’ perception of lexical tone contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 1–28.
23.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.TanL. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59.
24.
PerfettiC. A.ZhangS. (1991). Phonemic processes in reading Chinese words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 633–643.
25.
ProtopapasA. (2007). CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behaviour Research Methods, 39, 859–862.
26.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
27.
SaitoK. (2018). Advanced second language segmental and suprasegmental acquisition. In MalovrhP. A.BenatiA. G. (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 282–303). John Wiley & Sons.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53, 273–293.
30.
SpinksJ. A.LiuY.PerfettiC. A.TanL. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information. Cognition, 76, B1–B11.
31.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
32.
SzeW. P.YapM. J.LiowS. J. R. (2015). The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1541–1570.
33.
TaftM.ChenH. C. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: The influence of tones. In ChenH. C.TzengO. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 151–172). Elsevier.
34.
TanL. H.HoosainR.PengD.-L. (1995). Role of presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43–54.
35.
TanL. H.PerfettiC. A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 165–200.
36.
TanL. H.PerfettiC. A. (1999). Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 382–393.
37.
TongY.FrancisA. L.GandourJ. T. (2008). Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 689–708.
38.
TsukadaK.KondoM. (2018). The perception of Mandarin Lexical tones by native speakers of Burmese. Language and Speech, 62, 625–640.
39.
VerdonschotR. G.KinoshitaS. (2018). Mora or more? The phonological unit of Japanese word production in the Stroop color naming task. Memory & Cognition, 46, 410–425.
40.
WangM.ArciuliJ. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: Phonology beyond phonemes: Contributions of suprasegmental information to reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 1–4.
41.
WangM.LiC.LinC. Y. (2015). The contributions of segmental and suprasegmental information in reading Chinese characters aloud. PLOS ONE, 10, Article e0142060.
42.
WangX. (2006). Perception of L2 tones: L1 lexical tone experience may not help. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 85–88.
43.
WangY.SerenoJ. A.JongmanA. (2006). L2 acquisition and processing of Mandarin tones. Cambridge University Press.
44.
WaylandR. P.GuionS. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681–712.
45.
WinskelH.PereaM. (2014). Does tonal information affect the early stages of visual-word processing in Thai?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 209–219.
46.
YinB.RohsenowJ. S. (1994). Modern Chinese characters. Sinolingua.
47.
YipM. (2002). Tone. Cambridge University Press.
48.
YuK.LiL.ChenY.ZhouY.WangR.ZhangY.LiP. (2019). Effects of native language experience on Mandarin lexical tone processing in proficient second language learners. Psychophysiology, 56, Article e13448.
49.
YuL.ReichleE. D. (2017). Chinese versus English: Insights on cognition during reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 721–724.
50.
ZhouY. (2003). The historical evolution of Chinese languages and scripts. Ohio State University Press.
