This paper sets out to examine Italian bilingual children’ attitudes about Child Language Brokering (CLB), with a focus on the perceived feelings (affective component of attitudes) and benefits (cognitive component of attitudes) related to CLB. The aim is to study the presence of any relationship between the affective and cognitive components of child language brokers’ attitudes, since they can affect the outcomes of CLB and their analysis can provide tools to reduce the stressors related to it.
Methodology:
A survey was carried out among 150 immigrant students attending vocational high schools in the Northern and Central regions of Italy. Demographic and linguistic data were processed by means of a descriptive analysis, while attitudinal scales were processed by means of both descriptive and inferential analysis.
Findings:
The results will show that the child language brokers who perceive stronger positive feelings about CLB also report stronger attitudes towards the benefits of the practice.
Originality:
Considering the lack of research examining child language brokers’ attitudes in Italy by means of attitude scales, and the lack of attention to the affective and cognitive dimensions of such attitudes, this study addresses this gap by investigating these two dimensions of CLB.
AjzenI. (1989). Attitude structure and behaviour. In PratkanisA. R.BrecklerS. J.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), The third Ohio State University volume on attitudes and persuasion. Attitude structure and function (pp. 241–274). Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P.KumkaleG. T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3–20). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AngelelliC. V. (2016). Looking back: A study of (ad-hoc) family interpreters. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 5–31.
4.
AntoniniR. (Ed.). (2014). La mediazione linguistica e culturale non professionale in Italia [Non-professional linguistic and cultural mediation in Italy]. Bononia University Press.
5.
AntoniniR. (2015). Child language brokering. In PöchhackerF. (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies (pp. 48–49). Routledge.
6.
AntoniniR. (2016). Caught in the middle: Child language brokering as a form of unrecognized language service. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(7), 710–725.
7.
AntoniniR.CirilloL.RossatoL.TorresiI. (Eds.). (2017). Non-professional interpreting and translation. State of the art and future of an emerging field of research. John Benjamins.
8.
BucariaC.RossatoL. (2010). Former child language brokers: Preliminary observations on practice, attitudes and relational aspects. Mediazioni, 10, 239–268.
9.
BurielR.PerezW.De MentT.ChavezD. V.MoranV. R. (1998). The relationship of language brokering to academic performance, biculturalism, and self-efficacy among Latino adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, 283–297.
10.
CeccoliF. (2018). Child language brokering: la percezione degli studenti di origine straniera e dei rispettivi insegnanti [Child language brokering: foreign-born students’ and their teachers’ perceptions]. In CoonanC. M.BierA.BallarinE. (Eds.), La didattica delle lingue nel nuovo millennio. Le sfide dell’internazionalizzazione [Language teaching in the new millennium. The challenges of internationalisation] (pp. 71–82). Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, Digital Publishing.
11.
CirilloL. (2017). Child language brokering in private and public settings: Perspectives from young brokers and their teachers. In AntoniniR.CirilloL.RossatoL.TorresiI. (Eds.), Non-professional interpreting and translation: State of the art and future of an emerging field of research (pp. 295–314). John Benjamins.
12.
De AbreuG.O’DellL. (2017). Theorizing child language brokering: The example of brokering in health care settings. In WeisskirchR. S. (Ed.), Language brokering in immigrant families (pp. 180–204). Routledge.
13.
DemetrioD.FavaroG. (1992). Immigrazione e pedagogia interculturale [Immigration and intercultural education]. La Nuova Italia.
14.
DornerL. M.OrellanaM. F.JiménezR. (2008). It’s one of those things that you do to help the family: Language brokering and the development of immigrant adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 515–543.
15.
GarcíaO.WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave.
16.
GuanS.-S. A.ShenJ. (2014). Language brokering and parental praise and criticism among young adults from immigrant families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1334–1342.
17.
HalgunsethL. (2003). Language brokering: Positive developmental outcomes. In ColemanM.GanongL. (Eds.), Points and counterpoints: Controversial relationship and family issues in the 21st century: An anthology (pp. 154–157). Roxbury.
18.
HarrisB. (1976). The importance of natural translation. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 12, 96–114.
19.
HarrisB.SherwoodB. (1978). Translating as an innate skill. In GerverD.SinaikoH. W. (Eds.), Language interpretation and communication (pp. 141–162). Plenum Press.
20.
HaugenE. (1973). Bilingualism, language contact, and immigrant languages in the United States: A research report 1956–1970. In SebeokT. A. (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (pp. 505–591). Mouton.
21.
KamJ.LazarevicV. (2014). Communicating for one’s family: An interdisciplinary review of language and cultural brokering in immigrant families. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38(1), 3–37.
22.
KerswillP. (2006). Migration and language. In MattheierK.AmmonU.TrudgillP. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik. An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 2271–2285). De Gruyter.
23.
KimS. Y.WangY.WeaverS. R.ShenY.Wu-SeiboldN.LiuC. H. (2014). Measurement equivalence of the language-brokering scale for Chinese American adolescents and their parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 180–192.
24.
KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
LópezB. G. (2020). Incorporating language brokering experiences into bilingualism research: An examination of informal translation practices. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(1), 1–19.
26.
MartinezC. R.McClureH.EddyJ. M. (2009). Language brokering contexts and behavioural and emotional adjustment among Latino parents and adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 71–98.
27.
MeyerB.ApfelbaumB. (Eds.). (2010). Multilingualism at work: From policies to practices in public, medical and business settings. John Benjamins.
28.
OrellanaM. F.DornerL.PulidoL. (2003). Accessing assets: Immigrant youth’s work as family translators or ‘para-phrasers’. Social Problems, 50(4), 505–524.
29.
RobsonC. (1994). Experiment, design and statistics in psychology (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.
30.
ShannonS. (1990). English in the barrio: The quality of contact among immigrant children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Science, 12(3), 256–276.
31.
ShenY.SeoE.HuY.ZhangM.ChaoR. K. (2019). Measurement invariance of language brokering extent and attitudes in linguistic minority adolescents: Item response theory analyses. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(2), 170–178.
32.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (2001). Children of immigration. Harvard University Press.
33.
TreffingerD.RenzulliJ. S. (1986). Giftedness as potential for creative productivity: Transcending IQ scores. Roeper Review, 8, 150–154.
34.
TseL. (1995). Language brokering among Latino adolescents: Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 17, 180–193.
35.
TseL. (1996). Language brokering in linguistic minority communities: The case of Chinese and Vietnamese-American students. Bilingual Research Journal, 20, 485–498.
36.
ValdésG.ChávezC.AngelelliC. V. (2003). A performance team: Young interpreters and their parents. In ValdésG. (Ed.), Expanding definitions of giftedness. The case of young interpreters from immigrant communities (pp. 63–98). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
ValdésG.FigueroaR. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Ablex.
38.
Valero-GarcésC. (2008). Formas de Madiación Intercultural. Traducción e Interpretación en los Servicios Públicos. Conceptos, datos, situaciones y práctica [Forms of Intercultural Mediation. Translation and Interpreting in Public Services. Concepts, data, situations and practice]. Editorial Comares.
39.
ValtolinaG. G. (2010). I figli come mediatori linguistici. Uno studio su un campione di adolescenti filippini [Children as language mediators. A study on a sample of Filipino adolescents]. Rivista di Studi Familiari, 1, 113–124.
40.
WeberK. (1984). Training translators and conference interpreters. Prentice Hall.
41.
WebsterM.FoschiM. (Eds.). (1998). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford University Press.
42.
WeiL. (Ed.). (2000). The bilingualism reader. Routledge.
43.
WeinreichU. (1953). Languages in contact, findings and problems. Mouton.
44.
WeisskirchR. S. (2007). Feelings about language brokering and family relations among Mexican American early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(4), 545–561.
45.
WeisskirchR. S. (2017a). A developmental perspective on language brokering. In WeisskirchR. S. (Ed.), Language brokering in immigrant families (pp. 7–25). Routledge.
46.
WeisskirchR. S. (Ed.). (2017b). Language brokering in immigrant families. Theories and contexts. Routledge.
47.
WeisskirchR. S.AlvaS. (2002). Language brokering and the acculturation of Latino children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24(3), 369–378.
48.
ZanfriniL. (2013). Immigration and labour market. In CesareoV. (Ed.), Migration: A picture from Italy (pp. 39–55). Fondazione ISMU.
