Code-switching is a psycholinguistic and a social phenomenon, which can be predicted by a number of factors including interlocutor and topic. A total of 655 code-switches were found in the data.
Aims and Objectives:
This study investigated language preference and code-switching produced by unimodal sign-bilinguals of two sign languages, Kufr Qassem Sign Language (KQSL), a local sign language used in central Israel, and Israeli Sign Language (ISL), the national sign language of Israel. More specifically, we tested how interlocutor and topic affect language preference and code-switching patterns.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
Ten KQSL-ISL bilinguals participated in semi-spontaneous conversations, in three language conditions: (1) with another bilingual, (2) with a KQSL-dominant signer, and (3) with a monolingual ISL signer. They were given local and global topics to discuss.
Data and Analysis:
A total of 655 code-switches were found in the data.
Findings/Conclusion:
Interlocutor and topic were found to be significant predictors of the frequency of language preference. Furthermore, an interaction was found between interlocutor and topic, showing that code-switches occurred most frequently when there was a mismatch between the interlocutor and the topic (e.g., KQSL-dominant signer and global topic, or ISL monolingual and local topic).
Originality and Significance/Implications:
The findings suggest that inhibition of one language might be more difficult in mismatched situations, leading to a higher frequency of code-switching.
AdamR. (2012). Unimodal bilingualism in the Deaf community: Language contact between two sign languages in Australia and the United Kingdom [PhD thesis]. University College London.
3.
AdamR. (Director). (2017). Australian Irish Sign Language: A minority sign language within a larger sign language community. Endangered Languages Archive [Video recording]. http://hdl.handle.net/2196/00-0000-0000-000F-BF42-A
4.
AuerP. (1995). The Pragmatics of Code-Switching: A Sequential Approach. In MuyskenP.MilroyL. (Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (pp. 115–135). Cambridge University Press.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
7.
BentahilaA. (1983). Motivations for code-switching among Arabic-French bilinguals in Morocco. Language & Communication, 3(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(83)90003-4
8.
CostaA.SantestebanM. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511.
9.
CrasbornO.SloetjesH. (2008). Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language. Proceedings of LREC 2008, Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
10.
EberhardD. M.SimonsG. F.FennigC. D. (Directors). (2021). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (24th ed.). SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com
11.
EmmoreyK.BorinsteinH. B.ThompsonR.GollanT. H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism: A comparison of spoken and signed language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 43–61.
12.
GilesH.BourhisR.TaylorD. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In GilesH. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). Academic Press.
13.
GreenD. W. (1986). Control, activation and resource. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223.
14.
GreenD. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual Lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133
15.
GrosjeanF. (1992). The bilingual & the bicultural person in the hearing & in the deaf world. Sign Language Studies, 77, 307–320.
16.
GrosjeanF. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Blackwell Publishers.
17.
GrosjeanF. (2016). The Complementarity Principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance. In Silva-CorvalánC.Treffers-DallerJ. (Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals (pp. 66–84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107375345.004
18.
HellerM. (2007). Bilingualism as Ideology and Practice. In HellerM. (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596047_1
19.
HenkinR. (2016). Functional codeswitching and register in educated Negev Arabic interview style. In Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (Vol. 79, pp. 279–304).
20.
JaegerT. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
21.
JaraisyM. (2021). Language change in Kufr Qassem deaf community: Intra- and inter-modal language contact [MA thesis]. Bar-Ilan University.
22.
JaraisyM.StampR. (2022). The vulnerability of emerging sign languages: (E)merging sign languages?Languages, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010049
KastnerI.MeirI.SandlerW.DachkovskyS. (2014). The emergence of embedded structure: Insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00525
25.
KischS. (2012). Al-Sayyid: A sociolinguistic sketch. In ZeshanU.de VosC. (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities (1st ed., pp. 365–372). De Gruyter. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkjwzx.18
26.
LipskiJ. M. (2005). Code-switching or borrowing? No sé so no puedo decir, you know. Selected Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 1–15).
27.
LucasC.BayleyR.McCaskillC.HillJ. (2015). The intersection of African American English and Black American sign language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489204
28.
MeirI.IsraelA.SandlerW.PaddenC. A.AronoffM. (2013). The influence of community on language structure: Evidence from two young sign languages. Linguistic Variation, 12(2), 247–291. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei
29.
MeirI.SandlerW. (2008). A language in space: The story of Israeli sign language (1st ed.). Psychology Press.
30.
MeirI.SandlerW.PaddenC. A.AronoffM.MarscharkM.SpencerP. E. (2010). Emerging sign languages. In Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
31.
MeuterR. F.AllportA. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. J. Mem. Lang, 40, 25–40.
MuyskenP. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge University Press.
34.
Myers-ScottonC. (2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford University Press.
35.
NovogrodskyR.StampR.Shaban-RabahS. (2023). Word order in simple sentences of tri-lingual tri-modal deaf students*. Sign Language & Linguistics, 26(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.22002.nov
Quinto-PozosD. G. (2002). Contact between Mexican sign language and American sign language in two Texas border areas. The University of Texas at Austin.
38.
RandD.SankoffD. (1991). GoldVarb 2.1: A Variable Rule Application for Macintosh [Computer software].
Rozen-BlayO.NovogrodskyR.DeganiT. (2022). Talking while signing: The influence of simultaneous communication on the spoken language of bimodal bilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 65(2), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00326
41.
SpolskyB. (2003). Reassessing Māori regeneration. Language in Society, 32(4), 553–578.
42.
StampR.JaraisyM. (2021). Language contact between Israeli Sign Language and Kufr Qassem sign language. Sign Language Studies, 21(4), 455–491. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2021.0007
43.
StampR.NovogrodskyR.Shaban-RabahS. (2021). Argument omissions by deaf students in three language modalities. First Language.
