The effect of language proficiency,usage,and exposure on cognitive control: A study in early adulthood Chinese learners of English

Abstract

Aims and Objectives/Purpose/Research Questions:

This study investigated the effect of the specific L2 learning experience (i.e., usage, proficiency, and exposure) on cognitive performance in 121 Chinese learners of English.

Design/Methodology/Approach:

The participants were divided into three groups: beginning, intermediate, and advanced learners. They are homogeneous in background variables (e.g., cultural and educational environment) but heterogeneous in the L2 language experience. They performed three non-linguistic cognitive tasks, tapping into multiple dimensions of cognitive functions in visual and auditory domains.

Data and Analysis:

Linear mixed-effect models were applied to RT-based analysis (i.e., analysis based on Reaction Time), and linear regression models were used for accuracy-based analysis. In addition, further multiple stepwise regression analyses were conducted to explore the relationships between individuals’ demographics, language experience, and their performance on the attentional tasks.

Findings/Conclusions:

Three groups were comparable in background measures (e.g., socioeconomic status [SES]) and fundamental cognitive abilities (e.g., working memory and IQ), but differed in specific subcomponents of cognitive functions. Specifically, compared with beginning learners, advanced learners who had a longer length of L2 usage and higher proficiency showed better inhibitory control; intermediate learners who received intensive L2 exposure and had higher proficiency showed better-switching ability and attentional disengagement. Intermediate and advanced learners were comparable in cognitive performance. The results suggest that early adulthood L2 learners experience similar cognitive effects of bilingualism, which are modulated by specific language experience.

Originality:

This is one of the first bilingual studies to incorporate both visual and auditory cognitive functions, while providing additional analyses to investigate the other components of cognitive control.

Significance/Implications:

The results contribute to the understanding of the key aspects of the L2 learning experience that contribute to the emergence of the cognitive effects of young adult learners.

Keywords

Language learner cognitive functions sequential congruency effect early adulthood

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bak

T. H.

Long

M. R.

Vega-Mendoza

Sorace

(2016). Novelty, challenge, and practice: The Impact of intensive language learning on attentional functions. PLOS ONE, 11(4), Article e0153485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153485

Bak

T. H.

Vega-Mendoza

Sorace

(2014). Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00485

Barton

(2014). MuMIn: Multi-model inference (R Package Version 1.10.5). http://CRAN. R-project. org/package= MuMIn

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Bialystok

(2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000099

Bialystok

(2020). Null results in bilingualism research: What they tell us and what they don’t. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 1(1), 8–22.

Bialystok

Craik

F. I. M.

Luk

(2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001

Blumenfeld

H. K.

Marian

(2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.012

Bonfieni

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Sorace

(2019). Language experience modulates bilingual language control: The effect of proficiency, age of acquisition, and exposure on language switching. Acta Psychologica, 193, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.004

10.

Botvinick

M. M.

Braver

T. S.

Barch

D. M.

Carter

C. S.

Cohen

J. D.

(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624

11.

Costa

Hernández

Sebastián-Gallés

(2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013

12.

Degirmenci

M. G.

Grossmann

J. A.

Meyer

Teichmann

(2022). The role of bilingualism in executive functions in healthy older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(4), 426–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211051291

13.

Egner

(2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.380

14.

Fan

McCandliss

B. D.

Sommer

Raz

Posner

M. I.

(2002). Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886

15.

Gratton

Coles

M. G. H.

Donchin

(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480

16.

Green

D. W.

Abutalebi

(2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377

17.

Grosjean

(2010). Bilingualism, biculturalism, and deafness. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903474051

18.

Grundy

J. G.

(2020). The effects of bilingualism on executive functions: An updated quantitative analysis. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 4(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00062-5

19.

Grundy

J. G.

Anderson

J. A. E.

Bialystok

(2017). Neural correlates of cognitive processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13333

20.

Grundy

J. G.

Chung-Fat-Yim

Friesen

D. C.

Mak

Bialystok

(2017). Sequential congruency effects reveal differences in disengagement of attention for monolingual and bilingual young adults. Cognition, 163, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.010

21.

Grundy

J. G.

Keyvani Chahi

(2017). Post-conflict slowing effects in monolingual and bilingual children. Developmental Science, 20(1), Article e12488. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12488

22.

Gullifer

J. W.

Chai

X. J.

Whitford

Pivneva

Baum

Klein

Titone

(2018). Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia, 117, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.037

23.

Hernández

Costa

Fuentes

L. J.

Vivas

A. B.

Sebastián-Gallés

(2010). The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990010

24.

Hui

N. -Y.

Yuan

Fong

M. C. -M.

Wang

W. S.

(2020). L2 proficiency predicts inhibitory ability in L1-dominant speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(5–6), 984–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920914399

25.

Kapa

L. L.

Colombo

(2013). Attentional control in early and later bilingual children. Cognitive Development, 28(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.01.011

26.

Kroll

Dussias

Bice

Perrotti

(2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937

27.

Kroll

J. F.

Bialystok

(2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.799170

28.

Lehtonen

Soveri

Laine

Järvenpää

de Bruin

Antfolk

(2018). Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(4), 394–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000142

29.

Long

M. R.

Vega-Mendoza

Rohde

Sorace

Bak

T. H.

(2019). Understudied factors contributing to variability in cognitive performance related to language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000749

30.

Lubans

Richards

Hillman

Faulkner

Beauchamp

Nilsson

Kelly

Smith

Raine

Biddle

(2016). Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics, 138(3), Article e20161642. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1642

31.

Luk

Bialystok

(2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574

32.

Luk

De Sa

Bialystok

(2011). Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(4), 596–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000186

33.

Marian

Blumenfeld

H. K.

Kaushanskaya

(2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

34.

Mishra

R. K.

(2015). Let’s not forget about language proficiency and cultural variations while linking bilingualism to executive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(1), 39–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000455

35.

Mishra

R. K.

Hilchey

M. D.

Singh

Klein

R. M.

(2012). On the time course of exogenous cueing effects in bilinguals: Higher proficiency in a second language is associated with more rapid endogenous disengagement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(8), 1502–1510. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.657656

36.

Paap

K. R.

Anders-Jefferson

Zimiga

Mason

Mikulinsky

(2020). Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-0207-y

37.

Paap

K. R.

Greenberg

Z. I.

(2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002

38.

Raven

J. C.

Foulds

G. A.

(1962). Advanced progressive matrices. H.K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.

39.

Robertson

I. H.

Ward

Ridgeway

Nimmo-Smith

(1994). The Test of Everyday Attention (TEA). Thames Valley Test Company.

40.

Serrano

(2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00591.x

41.

Sulpizio

Del Maschio

Fedeli

Abutalebi

(2020). Bilingual language processing: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 834–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.014

42.

Thierry

Y. J.

(2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(30), 12530–12535. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104

43.

Treccani

Argyri

Sorace

Della Sala

(2009). Spatial negative priming in bilingualism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.320

44.

Unsworth

(2015). Amount of exposure as a proxy for dominance in bilingual language acquisition. In Silva-Corvalán

Treffers-Daller

(Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 156–173). Cambridge University Press.

45.

Vega-Mendoza

West

Sorace

Bak

T. H.

(2015). The impact of late, non-balanced bilingualism on cognitive performance. Cognition, 137, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.008

46.

Ware

A. T.

Kirkovski

Lum

J. A. G.

(2020). Meta-analysis reveals a bilingual advantage that is dependent on task and age. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01458

47.

Wechsler

(1997). Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) (Vol. 14). Psychological Corporation.

48.

Xia

Bak

Sorace

Vega-Mendoza

(2022). Interference suppression in bilingualism: Stimulus-stimulus vs. stimulus-response conflict. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000304

49.

Yurtsever

Anderson

J. A. E.

Grundy

J. G.

(2023). Bilingual children outperform monolingual children on executive function tasks far more often than chance: An updated quantitative analysis. Developmental Review, 69, 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2023.101084

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB