Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The traditional phonetic classification of language rhythm as stress-timed or syllable-timed is attributed to Pike. Recently, two different proposals have been offered for describing the rhythmic structure of languages from acoustic-phonetic measurements. Ramus has suggested a metric based on the proportion of vocalic intervals and the variability (SD) of consonantal intervals. Grabe has proposed Pairwise Variability Indices (nPVI, rPVI) calculated from the differences in vocalic and consonantal durations between successive syllables. We have calculated both the Ramus and Grabe metrics for Latvian, traditionally considered a syllable rhythm language, and for Latvian as spoken by Russian learners. Native speakers and proficient learners were very similar whereas low-proficiency learners showed high variability on some properties. The metrics did not provide an unambiguous classification of Latvian.

Keywords

language learners Latvian rhythm Russian

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Barry, W.J. , Andreeva, B. , Russo, M. , Dimitrova, S. , & Kostadinova, T. (2003). Do rhythm measures tell us anything about language type? Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 2693-2696.

Bond, Z.S. , Markus, D. , & Stockmal, V. (2003). Prosodic and rhythmic patterns produced by native and non-native speakers of a quantity-sensitive language. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , Barcelona, 527-530.

Dauer, R. (1987). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm, Proceedings of 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Tallin, 447-450.

Dellwo, V. (2004). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for ΔC. Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, Budapest.

Dellwo, V. , & Wagner, P. (2003). Relations between language rhythm and speech rate , Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 471-474.

Grabe, E. , & Low, E.L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Laboratory Phonology 7, C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner , (Eds.) (pp. 515-546) Berlin: Mouton.

Grabe, E. , Post, B. , & Watson, I. (1999). The acquisition of rhythm in English and French , Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 1201 - 1204.

Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Javanovich.

10.

Laua, A. (1969). Latviesôu Literaras Valodas Fonetika [The phonetics of literary Latvian]. Riga: Zvaigzne .

11.

Lorch, M. & Meara, P. (1989). How people listen to languages they don't know . Language Sciences, 11, 343-353.

12.

Low E.L. , Grabe, E. , & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech , 43, 377-401.

13.

McAllister, R. , Flege, J.E. , & Piske, T. (1999). The acquisition of Swedish long versus short vowel contrasts by native speakers of English, Spanish and Estonian. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences . San Francisco, 751-754.

14.

McAllister, R. , Flege, J.E. , & Piske, T. (2000). Aspects of the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of English, Spanish and Estonian. Proceedings of the 13th Swedish Phonetics Conference (FONETIK 2000).

15.

Mehler, J. , Dupoux, E. , Nazzi, T. , & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1996). Coping with linguistic diversity: The infant's viewpoint. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.101-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

16.

Peterson, G.E. , & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693-703.

17.

Pike, K.L. (1946). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.

18.

Ramus, F. , Nespor, M. , & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265-292.

19.

Ramus, R. , Hauser, M.D. , Miller, C.T. , Morris, D. , & Mehler, J. (2000). Language discrimination by human newborns and cotton-top tamarins. Science, 288, 349-351.

20.

Ramus, F. , Dupoux, E. , & Mehler, J. (2003). The psychological reality of rhythm classes: Perceptual studies. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 337-342.

21.

Roach, P. (2004). A bibliography of timing and rhythm in speech . <http://www.personal.rdg.ac.uk/~llsroach/peter/&gt ;.

Measures of Native and Non-Native Rhythm in a Quantity Language

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References