Bilingual false recognition: Examining inferences and language tagging in the dual-language context

Abstract

Purpose:

Inference-making is a critical process in understanding and processing information daily. People synthesize inputs into a whole and retain the whole (gist) instead of specific parts (verbatim). False recognition of inferred information offers evidence for it. We conducted two studies to examine whether memory errors occurred similarly when bilinguals were tested separately and concurrently on two languages, and whether bilinguals remembered the language in which the information was received (language tag).

Methodology:

We recruited Turkish native speakers who spoke English as a second language. After inducing spatial inferences about objects, we tested participants on configuration, sentence recognition, and language recognition in Turkish, English, and dual-language conditions. We measured their second language proficiency and executive functioning with standardized assessments.

Data and analysis:

We performed within-subjects analyses of covariance to investigate the within-language differences in sentence recognition and the role of individual cognitive differences (N = 34 in Experiment 1, N = 48 in Experiment 2).

Findings:

Experiment 1 showed that inferences were falsely recognized in L1 (Turkish) and L2 (English) conditions, but not in the dual-language. We found no effect of individual cognitive differences. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 and found that false recognition of inferred sentences was predicted more by lower executive functions (EF) scores and higher second language proficiency. In both experiments, participants accurately identified the language tag. Higher EF scores predicted higher tag accuracy. We conclude that inferring information in the second language induces memory errors, and inferences are tagged with the language of encoding.

Originality:

We used an ecologically valid sentence-level paradigm to test inferences and their connection to bilingual false memories in the second language and dual-language contexts. We explored the individual differences in language and cognitive abilities.

Significance:

Bilingual information processing is influenced significantly by exposure to stimuli, task difficulty, the language context, and language proficiency.

Keywords

Inference-making bilingualism language tag false recognition bilingual memory executive functions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altarriba

Soltano

E. G.

(1996). Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents. Memory & Cognition, 24(6), 700–711.

Anastasi

Rhodes

Marquez

Velino

(2005). The incidence of false memories in native and non-native speakers. Memory, 13(8), 815–828.

Arndt

Beato

M. S.

(2017). The role of language proficiency in producing false memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.004

Barclay

J. R.

(1973). The role of comprehension in remembering sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 229–254.

Bialystok

Craik

F. I.

Green

D. W.

Gollan

T. H.

(2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(3), 89–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387084

Bjork

R. A.

(1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe

Shimamura

A. P.

(Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). The MIT Press.

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky

Kretzschmar

Tune

Wang

Genç

Philipp

Roehm

Schlesewsky

(2011). Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 117(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.010

Brainerd

C. J.

Reyna

V. F.

(2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00192

Brainerd

C. J.

Reyna

V. F.

(2004). Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development. Developmental Review, 24(4), 396–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.005

10.

Bransford

J. D.

Barclay

J. R.

Franks

J. J.

(1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3(2), 193–209.

11.

Brewer

W. F.

(1977). Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 673–678.

12.

Calvillo

D. P.

Mills

N. V.

(2020). Bilingual witnesses are more susceptible to the misinformation effect in their less proficient language. Current Psychology, 39, 673–680.

13.

Carneiro

Fernandez

(2010). Age differences in the rejection of false memories: The effects of giving warning instructions and slowing the presentation rate. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1–2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.004

14.

Chan

J. C. K.

McDermott

K. B.

(2006). Remembering pragmatic inferences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1215

15.

Deese

(1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17.

16.

De Groot

A. M

. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1001.

17.

Dornic

(1979). Information processing in bilinguals: Some selected issues. Psychological Research, 40(4), 329–348.

18.

Dunn

(2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test 4th edition. NCS Pearson.

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

20.

Francis

W. S.

Strobach

E. N.

Penalver

R. M.

Martínez

Gurrola

B. V.

Soltero

(2019). Word–context associations in episodic memory are learned at the conceptual level: Word frequency, bilingual proficiency, and bilingual status effects on source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(10), 1852.

21.

Green

D. W.

Abutalebi

(2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530.

22.

Grosjean

(2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol

(Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Blackwell Publishing.

23.

Harris

R. J.

(1974). Memory and comprehension of implications and inferences of complex sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(6), 626–637.

24.

Harris

R. J.

Monaco

G. E.

(1978). Psychology of pragmatic implication: Information processing between the lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107(1), 1–22.

25.

Howe

M. L.

Wimmer

M. C.

Gagnon

Plumpton

(2009). An associative-activation theory of children’s and adults’ memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.10.002

26.

Hussey

E. K.

Novick

J. M.

(2012). The benefits of executive control training and the implications for language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00158

27.

Johnson

M. K.

Bransford

J. D.

Solomon

S. K.

(1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98(1), 203.

28.

Karlsson

(2014). Advanced learners’ L1 (Swedish) versus L2 (English) inferencing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 3–23.

29.

Koriat

Goldsmith

Pansky

(2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 481–537.

30.

Kroll

J. F.

de Groot

A. M.

(1997). Lexical and conceptual memory in the bilingual: Mapping form to meaning in two languages. Lawrence Erlbaum.

31.

Kroll

J. F.

Stewart

(1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149.

32.

Liepmann

Saegert

(1974). Language tagging in bilingual free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(6), 1137.

33.

Liu

Fan

Rossi

Yao

Chen

(2016). The effect of cognitive flexibility on task switching and language switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(5), 563–579.

34.

Long

M. R.

Vega-Mendoza

Rohde

Sorace

Bak

T. H.

(2020). Understudied factors contributing to variability in cognitive performance related to language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728919000749

35.

Luk

Bialystok

(2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574

36.

Marian

Blumenfeld

H. K.

Kaushanskaya

(2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

37.

McDermott

K. B.

Chan

J. C.

(2006). Effects of repetition on memory for pragmatic inferences. Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1273–1284.

38.

McKoon

Ratcliff

(1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466.

39.

Misdraji

E. L.

Gass

C. S.

(2010). The trail making test and its neurobehavioral components. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(2), 159–163.

40.

Paradis

(2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism (Vol. 18). John Benjamins Publishing.

41.

Peirce

Gray

Simpson

MacAskill

Höchenberger

Sogo

Kastman

Lindeløv

J. K.

(2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203.

42.

Prior

Goldina

Shany

Geva

Katzir

(2014). Lexical inference in L2: Predictive roles of vocabulary knowledge and reading skill beyond reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(8), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9501-8

43.

Reyna

V. F.

Brainerd

C. J.

(1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(1), 1–75.

44.

Reyna

V. F.

Kiernan

(1994). Development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 178.

45.

Reyna

V. F.

Lloyd

(1997). Theories of false memory in children and adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(2), 95–123.

46.

Riehl

C. M.

(2010). The mental representation of bilingualism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(5), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.74

47.

Rodriguez-Fornells

Rotte

Heinze

H.-J.

Nösselt

Münte

T. F.

(2002). Brain potential and functional MRI evidence for how to handle two languages with one brain. Nature, 415(6875), 1026–1029.

48.

Roediger

H. L.

McDermott

K. B.

(1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803.

49.

Sachs

J. S.

(1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(9), 437–442.

50.

Saegert

Hamayan

Ahmar

(1975). Memory for language of input in polyglots. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(5), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.1.5.607

51.

Sahlin

B. H.

Harding

M. G.

Seamon

J. G.

(2005). When do false memories cross language boundaries in English—Spanish bilinguals? Memory & Cognition, 33, 1414–1421.

52.

Salthouse

T. A.

(2011). What cognitive abilities are involved in trail-making performance? Intelligence, 39(4), 222–232.

53.

Zhou

(2009). Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(8), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.003

54.

Yurtsever

Anderson

J. A.

Grundy

J. G.

(2023). Bilingual children outperform monolingual children on executive function tasks far more often than chance: An updated quantitative analysis. Developmental Review, 69, 101084.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB