“ Puro English and a little bit of Spanish”: Bi/multilingual kindergarteners’ language ideologies in a dual language bilingual class during the COVID-19 pandemic
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024
“ Puro English and a little bit of Spanish”: Bi/multilingual kindergarteners’ language ideologies in a dual language bilingual class during the COVID-19 pandemic
The goal of the study is to examine bi/multilingual children’s language beliefs and their contributions to school and family language policies in a two-way dual language bilingual education (DLBE) program in the United States while participating in online schooling from home.
Methodology:
We report from a larger critical ethnographic study with a Title I K-8 school in Arizona. The data for this study are based on ethnographic fieldwork during the 2020–2021 academic year with a DLBE kindergarten cohort.
Data and analysis:
We conducted semi-weekly class observations and individual semi-structured interviews with 12 bi/multilingual kindergarten children. Data analysis entailed a multi-step thematic analysis through several rounds of focused coding.
Findings:
Our findings show that the children were deeply aware of the languages they spoke, their proficiency in each, how they chose to express those proficiencies, and the way they identified with each language. We identify ways that children agentively used language to transcend separative language policies by using language fluidly.
Originality:
The study contributes to the literature on young children’s language policymaking and their reproductive and resistive forms of agency. Our child participants were 5 and 6 years old, an underrepresented age in research that connects school and family language policies. Furthermore, this group’s linguistic, racial-ethnic, and cultural diversity allows for a deeper glimpse into how bi/multilingual children develop complex identities.
Implications:
The study has implications for the importance of pedagogical and linguistic flexibility with young children in DLBE programs. The study shows the importance of how young bi/multilingual children respond to the processes of implementing a program by highlighting the role and position of each language in their home and school environments.
AhearnL. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
2.
AxelrodY. (2014). “Ganchulinas” and “Rainbowli” colors: Young multilingual children play with language in head start classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45, 103–110.
3.
BernsteinK. A.KatznelsonN.AmezcuaA.MohamedS.AlvaradoS. L. (2020). Equity/social justice, instrumentalism/neoliberalism: Dueling discourses of dual language in principals’ talk about their programs. TESOL Quarterly, 54, 652–684.
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
5.
BuckbandC.A. (2023). Conducting online ethnography during Covid-19: Methodological reflections from a Kindergarten classroom. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 54(3), 297–306.
6.
Cervantes-SoonC. G.DornerL.PalmerD.HeimanD.SchwerdtfegerR.ChoiJ. (2017). Combating inequalities in two-way language immersion programs: Toward critical consciousness in bilingual education spaces. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 403–427.
7.
Curdt-ChristiansenX. L. (2009). Invisible and visible language planning: Ideological factors in the family language policy of Chinese immigrant families in Quebec. Language Policy, 8, 351–375.
8.
Curdt-ChristiansenX. L. (2018). Family language policy. In TollefsonJ.Perez-MilansM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 420–441). Oxford University Press.
9.
DuránL. (2020). ‘Todas las poems que están creative’: Language ideologies, writing and bilingual children. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(6), 412–427.
10.
DuránL.PalmerD. (2014). Pluralist discourses of bilingualism and translanguaging talk in classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(3), 367–388.
11.
DurantiA. (2004). Agency in language. In DurantiA. (Ed.), A companion to linguistic Anthropology (pp. 451–473). Blackwell.
12.
FittsS. (2005). Reconstructing the status quo: Linguistic interaction in a dual-language school. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 337–365.
13.
FitzpatrickK.MayS. (2022). Critical ethnography and education: Theory, methodology, and ethics. Routledge.
14.
FloresN.SchisselJ. L. (2014). Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 454–479.
15.
GafarangaJ. (2010). Medium request: Talking language shift into being. Language in Society, 39(2), 241–270.
16.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley/Blackwell.
17.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A. (2018). Family and community engagement. In GarciaO.KliefgenJ.A. (Eds.), Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English learners (pp. 129–143). Teachers College Press.
18.
GarcíaO.FloresN.WoodleyH. (2012). Transgressing monolingualism and bilingual dualities: Translanguaging pedagogies. In YiakoumettiA. (Ed.), Harnessing linguistic variation to improve education (pp. 45–75). Peter Lang.
19.
GonzálezN. (2005). Children in the eye of the storm: Language socialization and language ideologies in a dual-language school. In ZentellaA. C. (Ed.), Building on strength: Language and literacy in Latino families and communities (pp. 162–174). Teachers College Press.
20.
HarrisonK. D. (2007). When languages die: The extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford University Press.
21.
HendersonK. I.PalmerD. K. (2015). Teacher and student language practices and ideologies in a third-grade two-way dual language program implementation. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(2), 75–92.
22.
JohnsonD. C. (2013). Language policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
KavehY. M. (2020). Unspoken dialogues between educational and family language policies: Language policy beyond legislations. Linguistics & Education, 60, 1–14.
24.
KavehY. M.BuckbandC. (2022). When life gives you lemons: Critically conscious family engagement in a virtual dual language kindergarten class during a pandemic. In DornerL. M.PalmerD. K.Cervantes-SoonC. G.HeimanD.CrawfordE. R. (Eds.), Critical consciousness in dual language bilingual education: Case studies on policy and practice (pp. 149–167). Routledge.
25.
KavehY. M.SandovalJ. (2020). ‘No! I’m going to school, I need to speak English!’: Who makes family language decisions?Bilingual Research Journal, 43(4), 362–383.
26.
KavehY. M.BernsteinB.Cervantes-SoonC.Rodriguez-MartinezS.MohamedS. (2022). Moving away from the 4-hour block: Arizona’s distinctive path to reversing its restrictive language policies. International Multilingual Research Journal, 16(2), 113–135.
27.
KheirkhahM. (2016). Language choice negotiations in parent-child interaction: Family language policy as a collaborative achievement. In SinghJ. N.KantaraA.CserzőD. (Eds.), Downscaling culture: Revisiting intercultural communication (pp. 228–253). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
28.
KingK. A.FogleL. W. (2013). Family language policy and bilingual parenting. Language Teaching, 46(2), 172–194.
29.
KroskrityP. V. (2004). Language ideologies. In DurantiA. (Ed.), Companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496–517). Basil Blackwell.
30.
KroskrityP. V. (2018). On recognizing persistence in the Indigenous language ideologies of multilingualism in two Native American Communities. Language & Communication, 62(B), 133–144.
31.
LanzaE. (2007). Multilingualism in the family. In AuerP.LiW. (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 45–67). Mouton de Gruyter.
32.
LaurendeauJ.ShararaN. (2008). ‘Women could be every bit as good as guys’: Reproductive and resistant agency in two ‘action’ sports. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 32(1), 24–47.
33.
LiW. (2022). Translanguaging as a political stance: Implications for English language education. ELT Journal, 76(2), 172–182.
34.
LittleS. (2023). ‘Half of who you are’: Parent and child reflections on the emotional experiences of reversing familial language shift. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(2), 217–231.
35.
LópezM. M. (2012). Children’s language ideologies in a first-grade dual-language class. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 12(2), 176–201.
36.
LuykxA. (2005, April). Children as socializing agents: Family language policy in situations of language shift. In ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism (Vol. 1407, p. 1414). Cascadilla Press.
37.
MadisonD. S. (2020). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Sage.
38.
MakiharaM. (2005). Rapa Nui ways of speaking Spanish: Language shift and socialization on Easter Island. Language in Society, 34(5), 727–762.
39.
MartínezR. A. (2013). Reading the world in Spanglish: Hybrid language practices and ideological contestation in a sixth-grade English language arts classroom. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 276–288.
40.
MartínezR. A.HikidaM.DuránL. (2015). Unpacking ideologies of linguistic purism: How dual language teachers make sense of everyday translanguaging. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(1), 26–42.
41.
Martinez NegretteG. (2022a). Bilingual ways with words: Children’s identity enactment and negotiation in a dual language immersion class. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(6), 1–16.
42.
Martinez NegretteG. (2022b). ‘You don’t speak Spanish in the cafeteria’: An intersectional analysis of language and social constructions in a kindergarten dual language immersion class. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1467–1483.
43.
McCartyT. L. (2011). Ethnography and language policy (1st ed.). Routledge.
44.
McCartyT. L.Romero-LittleM. E.WarholL.ZepedaO. (2009). Indigenous youth as language policy makers. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 8(5), 291–306.
45.
MeekB. A. (2019). Language endangerment in childhood. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48(1), 95–115.
46.
PalmerD.CaldasB. (2015). Critical ethnography. In KingK.LaiY. J.MayS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 8: Research methods in language and education (pp. 1–12). Springer.
47.
PatelL. (2016). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability (1st ed.). Routledge.
48.
PaughA. L. (2005). Learning about work at dinnertime: Language socialization in dual-earner American families. Discourse & Society, 16(1), 55–78.
49.
RevisM. (2019). A Bourdieusian perspective on child agency in family language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 177–191.
50.
RileyK. C. (2011). Language socialization and language ideologies. In DurantiA.OchsE.SchieffelinB. B. (Eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 493–514). Blackwell Publishing.
51.
RosaJ. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183.
52.
RosaJ. D.BurdickC. (2018). Language ideologies. In GarcíaO.FloresN.SpottiM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 1–25). Oxford University Press.
53.
SandA. (2013). From bush talk to nation language: Language attitudes in Jamaica before and after independence. In GohrischJ.GrünkemeierE. (Eds.), Postcolonial studies across the disciplines (pp. 71–89). Brill.
54.
SchecterS. R.BayleyR. (2004). Language socialization in theory and practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(5), 605–625.
55.
Smith-ChristmasC. (2020). Child agency and home language maintenance. In SchalleyA. C.EisenchlasS. A. (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development (pp. 218–235). De Gruyter Mouton.
56.
Smith-ChristmasC. (2022). Using a “Family Language Policy” lens to explore the dynamic and relational nature of child agency. Children in Society, 36, 354–368.
57.
SongJ. (2019). Language socialization and code-switching: A case study of a Korean–English bilingual child in a Korean transnational family. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 91–106.
58.
TarımŞ. D. (2019). Shifting frames: Turkish immigrant children’s rescaling practices in two school settings in Arizona. Journal of Pragmatics, 144, 141–157.
59.
WodakR.MeyerM. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
60.
WoolardK.SchiefflinB. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23(1), 55–82.
