The aim of this manuscript is to provide an overview of the population and languages studied and the methods and practices surrounding the definition of bilingualism in children below age 3.
Methodology:
A quantitative descriptive scoping review
Data and analysis:
From 530 articles, we identified 127 papers (167 studies) that met our predefined criteria, of which 144 studies defined their bilingual population.
Findings/conclusions:
The samples investigated were predominantly western in geographical origin and languages. Percent exposure was the most common method to measure bilingualism among infants and young children, with 20% and 25% the most used cutoffs as the minimum requirement for children’s second language. We also analyzed the predictive value of these cutoffs on the likelihood that studies reported a significant difference between monolinguals and bilinguals. The stricter the inclusion requirement for bilinguals was, the higher the odds of a study to report a difference between monolingual and bilingual children. We conclude that a lack of uniformity of definition in the field may be one factor that predicts whether or not significant differences are reported.
Originality:
This scoping review provides developmental researchers with a unique overview of the different practices used in the field to characterize bilingual and monolingual infants/toddlers. The reported results can be used as preliminary evidence for the field to report and carefully formulate how to categorize monolinguals and bilingual infants.
Significance/implications:
As globalization continues to foster migration and intercultural exchange, it is essential for developmental researchers to diversify their samples and language groups. We highly encourage researchers to carefully document the definitions and rationale for all their language groups and to consider analyzing the impact of bilingualism both from a categorical and continuous approach.
AndersonJ. A.MakL.ChahiA. K.BialystokE. (2018). The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behavior research methods, 50(1), 250–263.
2.
AnsaldoA. I.MarcotteK.SchererL.RaboyeauG. (2008). Language therapy and bilingual aphasia: Clinical implications of psycholinguistic and neuroimaging research. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 539–557.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2016). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
4.
AugierM.GratierM. (2019). L’engagement social du bébé bilingue en situation de diglossie à la Martinique: ef?fet du statut des langues [Bilingual infants’ social engagement in a diglossic situation in Martinique: The effect of language status]. Enfance, 2019(2), 265–285.
5.
BarrR.RusnakS. N.BritoN. H.NugentC. (2020).). Actions speak louder than words: Differences in memory flexibility between monolingual and bilingual 18-month-olds. Developmental Science, 23(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12881
BirulésJ.BoschL.BriekeR.PonsF.LewkowiczD. J. (2018). Inside bilingualism: Language background modulates selective attention to a talker’s mouth. Developmental Science, 22(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12755
8.
BoschL.Sebastián-GallésN. (1997). Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments. Cognition, 65(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00040-1
9.
BoschL.Sebastián-GallésN. (2001). Evidence of early language discrimination abilities in infants from bilingual environments. Infancy, 2(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0201_3
10.
BoschL.FiguerasM.TeixidóM.Ramon-CasasM. (2013). Rapid gains in segmenting fluent speech when words match the rhythmic unit: Evidence from infants acquiring syllable-timed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00106
11.
BreeE.De VerhagenJ.KerkhoffA.DoedensW.UnsworthS. (2016). Language learning from inconsistent input: Bilingual and monolingual toddlers compared. Infant and Child Development, 26(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1996
BritoN. H.GrenellA.BarrR. (2014). Specificity of the bilingual advantage for memory: Examining cued recall, generalization, and working memory in monolingual, bilingual, and trilingual toddlers. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1369. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01369
14.
BritoN. H.Sebastián-GallésN.BarrR. (2015). Differences in language exposure and its effects on memory flexibility in monolingual, bilingual, and trilingual infants. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000789
BritoN. H.GreavesA.Leon-SantosA.FiferW. P.NobleK. G. (2021). Associations between bilingualism and memory generalization during infancy: Does socioeconomic status matter?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(2), 231–240.
17.
Byers-HeinleinK. (2015). Methods for studying infant bilingualism. In SchwieterJ. W. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp. 133–154). Cambridge University Press.
18.
Byers-HeinleinK.Lew-WilliamsC. (2013). Bilingualism in the early years: What the science says. LEARNing landscapes, 7(1), 95.
19.
Byers-HeinleinK.EspositoA. G.WinslerA.MarianV.CastroD. C.LukG. (2019). The case for measuring and reporting bilingualism in developmental research. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1).
20.
Byers-HeinleinK.TsuiR. K. Y.Van RenswoudeD.BlackA. K.BarrR.BrownA.ColomerM.DurrantS.GampeA.Gonzalez-GomezN.HayJ. F.HernikM.JartóM.KovácsÁ. M.Laoun-RubensteinA.Lew-WilliamsC.LiszkowskiU.LiuL.SinghL. (2021). The development of gaze following in monolingual and bilingual infants: A multi-laboratory study. Infancy, 26(1), 4–38.
21.
CarbajalM. J.PeperkampS. (2020). Dual language input and the impact of language separation on early lexical development. Infancy, 25(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12315
22.
CattaniA.Abbot-SmithK.FaragR.KrottA.ArreckxF.DennisI.FlocciaC. (2014). How much exposure to English is necessary for a bilingual toddler to perform like a monolingual peer in language tests?International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(6), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12082
23.
ColeM. (2006). Internationalism in psychology: We need it now more than ever. American Psychologist, 61(8), 904–917.
24.
CoteL. R.BornsteinM. H. (2014). Productive vocabulary among three groups of bilingual American children: Comparison and prediction. First Language, 34(6), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723714560178
25.
ConboyB. T. (2002). Patterns of language processing and growth in early English-Spanish bilingualism. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego and San Diego State University.
26.
CrawfordJ. (1991). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory, and practice (2nd ed.). Crane.
27.
DeAndaS.BoschL.Poulin-DuboisD.ZesigerP.FriendM. (2016). The Language Exposure Assessment Tool: Quantifying language exposure in infants and children. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 59(6), 1–1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0234
28.
D’SouzaD.BradyD.HaenselJ. X.D’SouzaH. (2020). Is mere exposure enough? The effects of bilingual environments on infant cognitive development. Royal Society open science, 7(2), 180191.
29.
Educación Intercultural Bilingüe en América Latina y el Caribe [Intercultural Bilingual Education in Latin America and the Caribbean]. (2021). Avances y retrocesos en el marco de la pandemia de la COVID-19 [Progress and setbacks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (UNICEF).
30.
EllajosyulaR.NarayananJ.PattersonK. (2020). Striking loss of second language in bilingual patients with semantic dementia. Journal of Neurology, 267(2), 551–560.
31.
Garcia-SierraA.DiehlR. L.ChamplinC. (2009). Testing the double phonemic boundary in bilinguals. Speech communication, 51(4), 369–378.
32.
García-SierraA.Ramírez-EsparzaN.Silva-PereyraJ.SiardJ.ChamplinC. A. (2012). Assessing the double phonemic representation in bilingual speakers of Spanish and English: An electrophysiological study. Brain and language, 121(3), 194–205.
33.
GiovannoliJ.MartellaD.FedericoF.PirchioS.CasagrandeM. (2020). The impact of bilingualism on executive functions in children and adolescents: A systematic review based on the PRISMA method. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2398.
34.
GohS. K. Y.ThamE. K. H.MagiatiI.LitweeS.SanmugamS.QiuA.Rifkin-GraboiA. (2017). Analysis of item-level bias in the Bayley-III language subscales: The validity and utility of standardized language assessment in a multilingual setting. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 60, 1–9.
35.
GrosjeanF. (2010). Bilingual. Harvard University Press.
36.
GrosjeanF. (2013). Bilingualism: A short introduction. In GrosjeanF.LiP. (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 5–25). Wiley-Blackwell.
37.
HamiltonA.PlunkettK.SchaferG. (2000). Infant vocabulary development assessed with a British communicative development inventory. Journal of child language, 27(3), 689–705.
38.
HendriksT.WarrenM. A.Schotanus-DijkstraM.HassankhanA.GraafsmaT.BohlmeijerE.de JongJ. (2019). How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 489–501.
HilcheyM. D.KleinR. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 625–658.
41.
HolowkaS.Brosseau-LapréF.PetittoL. A. (2002). Semantic and conceptual knowledge underlying bilingual babies’ first signs and words. Language learning, 52(2), 205–262.
42.
Ibanez-LilloA.PonsF.CostaA.Sebastian-GallesN. (2010). Inhibitory control in 8-month-old monolingual and bilingual infants: Evidence from an anticipatory eye movement task. In Poster presented at the 22nd Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Baltimore, MD.
43.
IliaeiS. P.KillamH.Dal BenR.Byers-HeinleinK. (2020, September5). Bilingualism affects infant cognition: Insights from new and open data. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ex76a
44.
JahodaG. (2016). On the rise and decline of ‘indigenous psychology’. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 169–181.
45.
KalashnikovaM.EscuderoP.KiddE. (2018). The development of fast-mapping and novel word retention strategies in monolingual and bilingual infants. Developmental Science, 21(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12674
46.
KalashnikovaM.PejovicJ.CarreirasM. (2021). The effects of bilingualism on attentional processes in the first year of life. Developmental Science, 24(2), Article e13011.
47.
KašćelanD.PrevostP.SerratriceL.TullerL.UnsworthS.De CatC. (2020). A review of questionnaires quantifying bilingual experience in children: Do we document the same constructs?OSF. https://osf.io/etk59/
48.
KaushanskayaM.PriorA. (2015). Variability in the effects of bilingualism on cognition: It is not just about cognition, it is also about bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(1), 27–28.
49.
KingK. A.FogleL.Logan-TerryA. (2008). Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), 907–922.
50.
KovácsÁ. M.MehlerJ. (2009a). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6556–6560. http://www.pnas.org/content/106/16/6556.abstract
51.
KovácsÁ. M.MehlerJ. (2009b). Flexible learning of multiple speech structures in bilingual infants. Science, 325(5940), 611–612. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173947
52.
KreminL.Byers-HeinleinK. (2021). Why not both? Rethinking categorical and continuous approaches to bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25, 1560–1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211031986
53.
LegacyJ.ZesigerP.FriendM.Poulin-DuboisD. (2016). Vocabulary size, translation equivalents, and efficiency in word recognition in very young bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 760–783.
54.
LegacyJ.ZesigerP.FriendM.Poulin-duboisD. (2018). Vocabulary size and speed of word recognition in very young French–English bilinguals: A longitudinal study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000833
55.
LiuL.KagerR. (2016). Perception of a native vowel contrast by Dutch monolingual and bilingual infants: A bilingual perceptual lead. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(3), 335–345.
56.
LukG.BialystokE. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621.
57.
MarchmanV. A.Martine-SussmannC. (2002). Concurrent validity of caregiver/parent report measures of language for children who are learning both English and Spanish. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 45(5), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/080)
58.
MarchmanV. A.Martínez-SussmannC.DaleP. S. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual language learners. Developmental Science, 7(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00340.x
59.
MarianV. (2018). Bilingual research methods. Routledge.
MolnarM.PejovicJ.YeeE.CarreirasM. (2014). Cognitive gains in Basque-Spanish bilingual infants? In Poster Presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Berlin, Germany.
62.
MoriguchiY. (2021, June10). Beyond bias to Western participants, authors, and editors in developmental science running title: Beyond bias in developmental science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ms3qx
63.
Morin-LessardE.Poulin-DuboisD.SegalowitzN.Byers-HeinleinK. (2019). Selective attention to the mouth of talking faces in monolinguals and bilinguals aged 5 months to 5years. Developmental Psychology, 55(8), 1640–1655.
64.
NielsenM.HaunD.KärtnerJ.LegareC. H. (2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31-38.
65.
OrenaA. J.Byers-HeinleinK.PolkaL. (2019). Reliability of the language environment analysis recording system in analyzing French–English bilingual speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(7), 2491–2500. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0342
PolkaL.OrenaA. J.SundaraM.WorrallJ. (2017). Segmenting words from fluent speech during infancy—Challenges and opportunities in a bilingual context. Developmental Science, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12419
68.
PolletT. V.SaxtonT. K. (2019). How diverse are the samples used in the journals’ evolution & human behavior’ and ‘evolutionary psychology’?Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(3), 357–368.
69.
Quantifying bilingual experience: Optimizing tools for researchers, clinicians and educators (n.d.). https://q-bex.org/
70.
Rocha-HidalgoJ.FellerM.BlanchfieldO. A.KuckerS. C.BarrR. F. (2021). Patterns of mutual exclusivity and retention: A study of monolingual and bilingual 2-year-olds. Infancy, 26, 1011–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12432
71.
RossettiL. (1990). The Rossetti infant-toddler language scale: A measure of communication and interaction. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.
SabourinL.LeclercJ. C.LapierreM.BurkholderM.BrienC. (2016). The language background questionnaire in L2 research: Teasing apart the variables. In Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, Calgary, Canada.
74.
SinghL. (2018). Bilingual infants demonstrate advantages in learning words in a third language. Child Development, 89(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12852
75.
SurrainS.LukG. (2019). Describing bilinguals: A systematic review of labels and descriptions used in the literature between 2005–2015. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(2), 401–415.
76.
TsangT.AtagiN.JohnsonS. P. (2018). Selective attention to the mouth is associated with expressive language skills in monolingual and bilingual infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.002
UnsworthS. (2013). Utrecht Bilingual Language Exposure Calculator (UBiLEC): Excel spreadsheet.
79.
ValianV. (2014). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 18(1), 3–24.
80.
VihmanM. M.ThierryG.LumJ.Keren-PortnoyT.MartinP. (2007). Onset of word form recognition in English, Welsh, and English-Welsh bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070269
81.
WilliamsL.ParthasarathyP.MolnarM. (2021). Measures of bilingual cognition: From infancy to adolescence. Journal of Cognition, 4, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.184
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
