Bilingual children do not transfer stress patterns: Evidence from suprasegmental and segmental analysis of L1 and L2 speech of Polish–English child bilinguals
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2020
Bilingual children do not transfer stress patterns: Evidence from suprasegmental and segmental analysis of L1 and L2 speech of Polish–English child bilinguals
The study examines bilingual children’s prosodic competence, specifically the ability to correctly assign word stress in both languages, and contrasts it with participants’ segmental competence. To this end, we estimated and compared the magnitude of prosodic and segmental transfer in L1 and L2 speech of typically developing Polish–English migrant bilingual children raised in the UK. We also explored the influence of cumulative language exposure on both types of transfer.
Design/methodology/approach:
A non-word repetition task was used in both languages to assess children’s faithfulness in repeating segmentals and stress patterns in two to five syllable-long items. Also, a parental questionnaire on cumulative language exposure was conducted to estimate the quality of input in both languages. All children (N = 59, M = 5;8) were early bilinguals raised in the UK.
Data and analysis:
A 2x2 ANOVA and a correlation analysis were conducted to compare the magnitude of prosodic and segmental transfer, within and across languages. Also, multiple regression analysis was performed to establish the predictors of transfer in L1 and L2.
Findings/conclusions:
The bilingual children repeated stress patterns in both languages correctly, showing resistance to transfer in word stress, even though bidirectional transfer was observed in segmentals. The magnitude of segmental transfer in Polish and English was predicted by cumulative exposure to English, while prosodic transfer in Polish was predicted by cumulative exposure to Polish.
Originality and significance/implications:
The study provides evidence on word stress placement in the age group of bilingual children, 4–7 years of age, in comparison with segmental data. It uses a novel methodology in comparing the magnitude of transfer between prosody and segmentals, within and across languages. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of language exposure for reducing the amount of segmental transfer in this group of children.
AbboubN.Bijeljac-BabicR.SerresJ.NazziT. (2015). On the importance of being bilingual: Word stress processing in a context of segmental variability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 111–120.
2.
AllenG. D.HawkinsS. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In Yeni-KomshianG. H.KavanaghJ.FergusonC. (Eds.), Child phonology, Vol. 1: Production (pp. 227–256). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Anderson-HsiehJ.JohnsonR.KoehlerK. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.
4.
ArchibaldJ. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish Metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37(3), 301–339.
5.
ArchibaldJ. (1993). Metrical phonology and the acquisition of L2 stress. In EckmanF. (Ed.), Confluence: Linguistics, L2 acquisition, and speech pathology (pp. 37–48). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
6.
AriasJ.LleóC. (2009). Comparing the representation of iambs by monolingual German, monolingual Spanish and bilingual German-Spanish children. In BraunmüllerK.HouseJ. (Eds.), Convergence and divergence in language contact situations: Hamburger studies in multilingualism (pp. 205–234). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
7.
Armon-LotemS.de JongJMeirN. (Eds.). (2015). Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8.
BallardK. J.DjajaD.ArciuliJ.JamesD. G.van DoornJ. (2012). Developmental trajectory for production of prosody: Lexical stress contrastivity in children ages 3 to 7 years and in adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(6), 1822–1835.
9.
Bijeljac-BabicR.HöhleB.NazziT. (2016). Early prosodic acquisition in bilingual infants: The case of the perceptual trochaic bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 210.
10.
Bijeljac-BabicR.SerresJ.HöhleB.NazziT. (2012). Effect of bilingualism on lexical stress pattern discrimination in French-learning infants. PLoS One, 7(2), e30843.
11.
BuntaF.IngramD. (2007). The acquisition of speech rhythm by bilingual Spanish-and English-speaking 4-and 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 999–1014.
12.
CarhartR.JergerJ. (1959). Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 24, 330–345.
13.
ClopperC. G. (2002). Frequency of stress patterns in English: A computational analysis. Indiana University Lingustics Club Working Papers, 2, 1–9.
14.
DemelG. (1987). Elementy logopedii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
15.
DoneganP. (2013). Normal vowel development. In BallM. J.GibbonF. E. (Eds.), Handbook of vowels and vowel disorders (pp. 24–60). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16.
Fabiano-SmithL.BarlowJ. A. (2010). Interaction in bilingual phonological acquisition: Evidence from phonetic inventories. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 81–97.
17.
Fabiano-SmithL.GoldsteinB. A. (2010). Phonological acquisition in bilingual Spanish–English speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(1), 160–178.
18.
FikkertP. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
19.
FlegeJ. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In BirdsongD. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
20.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO. S.JangS. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.
21.
FlegeJ. E.FletcherK. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370–389.
22.
GathercoleS. E. (1995). Is non-word repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the non-words. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 83–94.
23.
GeneseeF.NicoladisE. (2006). Bilingual first language acquisition. In HoffE.ShatzM. (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 324–342). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
GertkenL. M.AmengualM.BirdsongD. (2014). Assessing language dominance with the Bilingual language profile. In LeclercqP.EdmondsA.HiltonH. (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency. Perspectives from SLA (pp. 208–225). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
25.
GoffmanL.MalinC. (1999). Metrical effects on speech movements in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1003–1015.
26.
GoldsteinB.WashingtonP. (2001). An initial investigation of phonological patterns in 4-year-old typically developing Spanish-English bilingual children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(3), 153–164.
27.
GoldsteinB. A.BuntaF. (2012). Positive and negative transfer in the phonological systems of bilingual speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 388–401.
HalleM.VergnaudJ. R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
HamanE.WodnieckaZ.MareckaM.SzewczykJ.Białecka-PikulM.OtwinowskaA.. . . Foryś-NogalaM. (2017). How does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? Evidence from polish-English migrants to the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1444.
31.
HamayanE.GeneseeF.TuckerR. G. (1977). Affective factors and language exposure in second language learning. Language Learning, 27, 225–241.
32.
HamblyH.WrenY.McLeodS.RoulstoneS. (2012). The influence of bilingualism on speech production: A systematic review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(1), 1–24.
33.
HanY. M.DommerguesJ. Y. (1999). The early acquisition of prosody in bilinguals’ weaker language. Age, 2(2), 1–83.
34.
HansenP.ŁuniewskaM.SimonsenH. G.HamanE.MieszkowskaK.KołakJ.WodnieckaZ. (2017). Picture-based vocabulary assessment versus parental questionnaires: A cross-linguistic study of bilingual assessment methods. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1367006917733067.
35.
HayesB. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(2), 227–276.
36.
HayesB. (1995). Metrical theory of stress. Principles and case studies. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
37.
HochbergJ. G. (1988). Learning Spanish stress: Developmental and theoretical perspectives. Language, 64, 683–706.
38.
HolmA.DoddB. (1999). Differential diagnosis of phonological disorder in two bilingual children acquiring Italian and English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13(2), 113–129.
39.
HuangB. H.JunS. A. (2011). The effect of age on the acquisition of second language prosody. Language and Speech, 54(3), 387–414.
40.
JęziorskaD. (1998). Fonetyczno-akustyczna analiza samogłosek w mowie dzieci przed-szkolnych [an acoustic-phonetic analysis of vowels in the speech of nursery school children]. Unpublished MA thesis. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
41.
JonesG.RowlandC. F. (2017). Diversity not quantity in caregiver speech: Using computational modeling to isolate the effects of the quantity and the diversity of the input on vocabulary growth. Cognitive Psychology, 98, 1–21.
42.
JusczykP. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
JusczykP. W.CutlerA.RedanzN. J. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64(3), 675–687.
44.
JusczykP. W.HoustonD. M.NewsomeM. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159–207.
45.
KehoeM. (1997). Stress error patterns in English-speaking children’s word productions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11(5), 389–409.
46.
KehoeM. (1998). Support for metrical stress theory in stress acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12, 1–23.
47.
KehoeM. (2002). Developing vowel systems as a window to bilingual phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 315–334.
48.
KehoeM. M.LleóC.RakowM. (2004). Voice onset time in bilingual German–Spanish children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(1), 71–88.
49.
KehoeM.Stoel-GammonC. (1997). Truncation patterns in English-speaking children’s word productions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(3), 526–541.
50.
KehoeM.Stoel-GammonC.BuderE. H. (1995). Acoustic correlates of stress in young children’s speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38(2), 338–350.
51.
KeshavarzM.IngramD. (2002). The early phonological development of a Farsi English bilingual child. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 255–269.
52.
KhattabG. (2000). VOT in English and Arabic bilingual and monolingual children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics & Phonetics, 8(1), 95–122.
53.
KleinH. (1984). Learning to stress: A case study. Journal of Child Language, 11(2), 375–390.
54.
KuhlP. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 831–843.
55.
KuśK.OtwinowskaA.BanasikN.Kiebzak-ManderaD. (2012). Kwestionariusz Rozwoju Językowego [Language Development Questionnaire]. Polish adaptation of the 1st version of PaBiQ, developed within COST Action IS0804. Unpublished material. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
56.
LiJ.MokP. P. K. (2014). The acquisition of English lexical stress by Cantonese–English bilingual children at 2;06 and 3;0. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 7, 688–692.
57.
LleóC. (2002). The role of markedness in the acquisition of complex prosodic structures by German-Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 291–313.
58.
ŁukaszewiczB.RozborskiB. (2008). Korelaty akustyczne akcentu wyrazowego w języku polskim dorosłych i dzieci. [Acoustic correlates of word stress in adult and child Polish]. Prace Filologiczne, 54, 265–283.
MareckaM.WrembelM.ZembrzuskiD.Otwinowska-KasztelanicA. (2015). Do early bilinguals speak differently than their monolingual peers? Predictors of phonological performance of Polish-English bilingual children. In BabatsouliE.IngramD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015 (pp. 207–213). Chania: Institute of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech.
61.
MayrR.HowellG.LewisR. (2014). Asymmetries in phonological development: The case of word-final cluster acquisition in Welsh-English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 42(1), 146–179.
62.
McGregorK. K.JohnsonA. C. (1997). Trochaic template use in early words and phrases. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(6), 1220–1231.
63.
MieszkowskaK.ŁuniewskaM.KołakJ.KacprzakA.WodnieckaZ.HamanE. (2017). Home language will not take care of itself: Vocabulary knowledge in trilingual children in the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01358.
MokP. P. (2011). The acquisition of speech rhythm by three-year-old bilingual and monolingual children: Cantonese and English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(4), 458–472.
66.
MoyerA. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 81–108.
67.
NathaniS.OllerD. K.Cobo-LewisA. (2003). Final syllable lengthening (FSL) in infant vocalizations. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 3–25.
68.
ParadisJ. (2001). Do bilingual two-year-olds have separate phonological systems?International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(1), 19–38.
69.
ParadisJ.GeneseeF. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 1–25.
70.
PearsonB. Z. (2002). Bilingual infants: What we know, what we need to know. In Suarez-OrozcoM.PáezM. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 306–320). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
71.
PoeppelD.IdsardiW. J.van WassenhoveV. (2008). Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 1071–1086.
72.
PorterJ. H.HodsonB. W. (2001). Collaborating to obtain phonological acquisition data for local schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(3), 165–171.
73.
PrzepiórkowskiA.BańkoM.GórskiR. L.Lewandowska-TomaszczykB. (2012). Narodowy korpus języka polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
74.
QueenR. M. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish-German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30(1), 55–80.
75.
RasierL.HiligsmannP. (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 28, 41–66.
76.
RedfordM. A.OhG. E. (2016). Children’s abstraction and generalisation of English lexical stress patterns. Journal of Child Language, 43, 338–365.
77.
RostG. C.McMurrayB. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12(2), 339–349.
78.
RubachJ.BooijG. E. (1985). A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua, 66(4), 281–320.
79.
SchmidtE.PostB. (2015). The development of prosodic features and their contribution to rhythm production in simultaneous bilinguals. Language and Speech, 58(1), 24–47.
80.
SinghL.PohF. L.FuC. S. (2016). Limits on monolingualism? A comparison of monolingual and bilingual infants’ abilities to integrate lexical tone in novel word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 667.
81.
SmitA. B.HandL.FreilingerJ. J.BernthalJ. E.BirdA. (1990). The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(4), 779–798.
82.
SobkowiakW. (2006). Phonetics of EFL dictionary definitions. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
83.
Sołtys-ChmielowiczA. (1998). Wymowa dzieci przedszkolnych. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
84.
Stoel-GammonC. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 1–34.
85.
SzewczykJ.WodnieckaZ. (2012). Non-word repetition task. Unpublished Material. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
86.
SzewczykJ.WodnieckaZ.OtwinowskaA.ChiatS. (2012). English non-word repetition task. Unpublished Material. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
87.
TamburelliM.SanoudakiE.JonesG.SowinskaM. (2015). Acceleration in the bilingual acquisition of phonological structure: Evidence from Polish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 713–725.
88.
TingleyB. M.AllenG. D. (1975). Development of speech timing control in children. Child Development, 46, 186–194.
89.
TullerL. (2015). Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In Armon-LotemS.de JongJ.MeirN. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from Language Impairment (pp. 301–330). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
90.
TurkA. E.JusczykP. W.GerkenL. (1995). Do English-learning infants use syllable weight to determine stress?Language and Speech, 38, 143–158.
91.
UnsworthS. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 86–110.
92.
van HeuvenW. J. B.ManderaP.KeuleersE.BrysbaertM. (2013). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190.
93.
VihmanM. M.DePaolisR. A.DavisB. L. (1998). Is there a ‘Trochaic Bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development, 69(4), 935–949.
94.
YangJ.FoxR. A. (2014). Acoustic properties of shared vowels in bilingual Mandarin–English children. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2014), Singapore, 1297–1301.
95.
ZarębinaM. (1976). Tendencje rozwojowe polskich samogłosek nosowych. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego, 34, 25–33.
