Examining the effect of reduced input on language development: The case of gender acquisition in Russian as a non-dominant and dispreferred language by a bilingual Turkish

Abstract

Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions:

The main research question we seek to answer in the present study is: “What effect does reduced input in the non-dominant and dispreferred language have on the acquisition of Russian gender morphology by a bilingual Turkish–Russian child: Is it still sufficient for its monolingual-like development or can it cause incomplete acquisition of Russian gender morphology, at least, in some domains?”

Design/methodology/approach:

This study is a longitudinal case study.

Data and analysis:

The main source of data collection is video and audio recordings. Twenty-five recordings are available. They cover the period of between two years and 11 months (2;11) and 4;0. The data are examined in terms of the availability of masculine, feminine and neuter form-related genders, as well as availability of feminine and masculine semantic-related genders of nouns and pronouns in the first-, second- and third-person contexts. We look into whether the data of the bilingual child is marked with deviations from monolingual Russian data and/or incomplete acquisition of gender in any domain.

Findings/conclusions:

The findings of the present study, on the one hand, support the view that, by and large, reduced to a certain degree, input is still sufficient for monolingual-like language development; on the other hand, it demonstrates that reduced input may lead to non-monolingual-like and/or incomplete acquisition and, therefore, appears to be a main factor determining the development of a language and accounting for its strengths and weaknesses.

Keywords

Child bilingualism non-dominant and dispreferred language reduced input gender acquisition Russian

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alarcon

(2011). Spanish gender agreement under complete and incomplete acquisition: Early and late bilinguals’ linguistic behaviour within the noun phrase. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 332–350.

Aronoff

(1994). Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bonnesen

(2006). The status of the “weaker” language in unbalanced French/German bilingual language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 177–192.

Brown

(1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ceytlin

(2000). Jazyk i rebjenok: Lingvistika detskoi rechi [The language and the child: Linguistics of the child speech]. Gumanitarny Izdatel’ski Centr VLADOS.

Ceytlin

(2005). Kategorija roda v detskoj rechi [ The category of gender in the child speech ]. In Ceytlin

(Ed.), Problemy funkcionalnoj grammatiki [The problems of functional grammar] (pp. 346-376). St Petersburg, Russia: Russian Sciences Academia.

Comrie

(1987). The world’s major languages. London, UK: Routledge.

Corbett

(1982). Gender in Russian: An account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics, 6, 197-232.

Corbett

(1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Corbett

Fraser

(1993). Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 113–142.

11.

De Houwer

(1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Döpke

(2000). The weaker language in simultaneous bilingualism: Why it is not like L2. Unpublished manuscript, Monash University.

13.

Gvozdyev

(1961). Voprosy izuchenija detskoy rechi. [Child speech studies.]. Moscow, Russia: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk.

14.

Gvozdyev

(1981). Ot pervyh slov do pervogo klassa. Dnevnik nauchnyh nabludeniy [From the first words to the first grade. The diary of scientific observations]. Saratov, Russia: Saratovsky Universitet.

15.

Hulk

Cornips

(2006). Between 2L1 and child L2 acquisition: An experimental study of bilingual Dutch. Retrieved from http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/meertensnet/file/leoniec/20070613/hamburgdef_.pdf

16.

Kornfilt

(1997). Turkish. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

Meisel

(2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 495-514.

18.

Meisel

J. M.

(2011) First and second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Montrul

(2004). The acquisition of Spanish. Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and in Adult L2 acquisition. [Series on language acquisition and language disorders]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

20.

Pallant

(2007). SPSS survival manual. Buckingham and Philadelphia, USA: Open University Press.

21.

Polinski

(2008). Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers’ knowledge of noun categorization. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/mpolinsky/files/Gender_Under_Incomplete_Acquisition.pdf

22.

Popova

M. I.

(1973). Grammatical elements of language in the speech of pre-school children. In Slobin

D. I.

(Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 265–281). New York: L. Erlbaum Associates.

23.

Prevost

(2009). The acquisition of French. The development of inflectional morphology and syntax in L1 acquisition, bilingualism, and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

24.

Prévost

Paradis

(2004). The acquisition of French in different contexts. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

25.

Rodina

Westergaard

(2012). A cue-based approach to the acquisition of grammatical gender in Russian. Journal of Child Language, 39(5), 1077–1106.

26.

Schlyter

(1993). The weaker language in bilingual Swedish-French children. In Hyltenstam

Viberg

(ed.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives (pp. 289-308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Schlyter

Hakansson

(1994). Word order in Swedish as the first language, second language and weaker language in bilinguals. Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 9, 49-66.

28.

Stankiewicz

(1968). Declension and gradation of Russian substantives in contemporary standard Russian. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

29.

Timberlake

(1993). Russian. In Comrie

Corbett

G. G.

(Ed.), The Slavonic languages (pp.827-887). London, UK: Routledge.

30.

Vinogradov

(1972). Russij jazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove. [The Russian language. A grammatical study of the word]. Moscow, Russia: Vysschaja shkola.

31.

Zaliznjak

(1967). Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie [Russian nominal inflection]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.

Examining the effect of reduced input on language development: The case of gender acquisition in Russian as a non-dominant and dispreferred language by a bilingual Turkish–Russian child

Abstract

Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions:

Design/methodology/approach:

Data and analysis:

Findings/conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References