This study compares gender acquisition within determiner phrases between monolingual German children and bilingual children acquiring a Romance language (French, Spanish, Italian) and German or two Romance languages simultaneously. Furthermore, the two languages within the bilingual children are compared to one another with respect to the acquisition of gender. The influence of different factors on gender acquisition is discussed: language dominance, transparency of gender marking and/or reliability of gender cues in the respective languages. It shows that bilingual children can acquire the gender systems in both languages just as monolinguals and that bilingualism per se does not have a delaying effect. In bilingual children, as in monolingual children, German is most problematic in terms of gender acquisition. French represents only slightly more problems than Spanish and Italian, the latter two-gender systems being acquired with ease. Since adult phonological gender rules are characterized by their rather low validity in German and in French, lower accuracy with German gender indicates that the way how gender is marked in the languages influences acquisition more than the validity of gender rules; in German and not in French, gender marking is intertwined with case and number markings. Although our results suggest that gender accuracy depends on the language acquired, some children do not fit into the expected pattern of gender acquisition with respect to the analysed languages. Interestingly, all these children show a language imbalance. Therefore, we claim that the children’s gender accuracy can be predicted on the basis of the language acquired, but language dominance can blur this ranking. Interestingly, it is not the case that gender is delayed in the weak language of the bilingual children; language imbalance has the effect that the child may not tend towards the predicted side of an accuracy ranking (for the weaker language). A further result of this study is that accuracy on neuter gender is lower in bilingual German than in monolingual German, suggesting that the fact that the bilingual children acquire a two-gender system simultaneously with a three-gender system has a delaying effect for target-like neuter marking.
AbneyS. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge.
2.
AndersonJ. (1961). The morphophonemics of gender in Spanish nouns. Lingua, 10, 285–296.
3.
AntelmiD. (1997). La prima grammatica dell’italiano. Indagine longitudinale sull’acquisizione della morfosintassi italiana [The first grammar of Italian. Longitudinal investigation of the acquisition of Italian morphosyntax]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
4.
Arencibia GuerraL. (2008). Sprachdominanz bei bilingualen Kindern mit Deutsch und Französisch, Italienisch oder Spanisch als Erstsprachen (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany.
5.
CantoneK. F. (1999). Das Genus im Italienischen und Deutschen: Empirische Untersuchung zum bilingualen Erstspracherwerb (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universität Hamburg, Germany.
6.
CantoneK. F.KupischT.MüllerN.SchmitzK. (2008). Rethinking language dominance in bilingual children. Linguistische Berichte, 215, 307–343.
7.
CantoneK. F.MüllerN. (2008). Un Nase or una Nase? What gender marking within switched DPs reveals about the architecture of the bilingual language faculty. Lingua, 118, 810–826.
8.
ChastaingM. (1973). Le genre grammatical symbole de grandeur [Grammatical gender a symbol of size]. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 70, 427–451.
9.
ChiniM. (1995). Genere grammaticale e acquisizione. Aspetti della morfologia nominale in italiano L2 [Grammatical gender and acquisition. Aspects of nominal morphology in L2-Italian]. Milano, Italy: Francoangeli.
10.
ChiniM. (1998). Genuserwerb des Italienischen durch deutsche Lerner [Gender acquisition of Italian by German learners]. In WegenerH. (Ed.), Eine zweite Sprache lernen: Empirische Untersuchungen zum Zweitspracherwerb (pp. 39–58). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
11.
CiprianiP.ChiosiA. M.BottariP.PfannerL. (1993). L’acquisizione della morfosintassi in italiano: T Fasi e processi [The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: Phases and processes]. Padova, Italy: Unipress.
12.
ClarkE. (1986). Acquisition of romance, with special reference to French. In SlobinD. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data (Vol. I, pp. 687–782). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
CorbettG. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DesrochersA. (1986). Genre grammaticale et classification nominale. T Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 40, 224–250.
15.
DesrochersA.BrabantM. (1995). Interaction entre facteurs phonologiques et sémantiques dans une épreuve de catégorisation lexicale [Interaction between phonological and semantic factors in a test of lexical categorisation]. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 49, 240–262.
16.
DesrochersA.PaivioA. (1990). Le phonème initial des noms inanimés et son effet sur l’identification du genre grammatical [The initial phoneme of inanimate nouns and its effect on the identification of grammatical gender] Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 44, 44–57.
17.
DesrochersA.PaivioA.DesrochersS. (1989). L’effet de la fréquence d’usage des noms inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminaison sur l’identification du genre grammatical [The effect of the usage frequency of inanimate nouns and the predictive value of their endings on the identification of grammatical gender]. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43, 62–73.
18.
EchaideA. M. (1969). El género del sustantivo en español: Evolución y estructura [The gender of the substantive in Spanish: Evolution and structure]. Iberoromanica, 1, 89–124.
19.
EichlerN. (2011). Code-Switching bei bilingual aufwachsenden Kindern: Eine Analyse der gemischtsprachlichen Nominalphrasen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Genus [Code-Switching in bilingual children: An analysis of mixed DPs and the role of gender]. Tübingen: Narr. Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany.
20.
HaaseM. (2000). Reorganization of a gender system: The central Italian neuters. In UnterbeckB. (Ed.), Gender in grammar and cognition (pp. 221–236). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
21.
HarrisJ. W. (1991). The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 27–62.
22.
Hernández-PinaF. (1984). Theorías psicosociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna [Psycho-sociolinguistic theories and their application to the acquisition of Spanish as a first language]. Madrid, Spain: Siglo XXI.
23.
HoeppnerW. (1980). Derivative Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache und ihre algorithmische Analyse [Derivative word formation in present-day German and its algorithmic analysis]. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
24.
IdiazabalI. (1995). First stages in the acquisition of noun phrase determiners by a Basque-Spanish bilingual child. In Silva-CorvalánC. (Ed.), Spanish in four continents (pp. 261–278). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
25.
IvanovaL. (1985). Zum Genussystem des Deutschen und Bulgarischen (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universität Jena, Germany.
26.
JansenV. (2009). Determiners in first language acquisition of monolingual English and German children – A corpus-based investigation (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany.
27.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1978). The interplay between syntax, semantics and phonology in language acquisition processes. In CampbellR. N.SmithP. T. (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
28.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1979). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KleinP. W. (1983). Spanish gender morphology. Papers in Romance, 2, 57–64.
30.
KleinP. W. (1989). Spanish ‘gender’ vowels and lexical representation. Hispanic Linguistics, 3, 147–162.
31.
KöpckeK.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [Research on the gender system of present-day German]. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
32.
KöpckeK.-M. (1983). Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [The cognitive organisation of gender assignment to monosyllabic words in present-day German]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 11, 166–182.
33.
KöpckeK.-M.ZubinD. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation [Six principles for gender assignment in German: A contribution to naturalclassification]. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.
34.
KuchenbrandtI. (2008). Cross-linguistic influences in the acquisition of grammatical gender?Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit, 86, 1–28.
35.
KupischT.MüllerN. (2004). Nominal reference and the acquisition of clitics in Romance. Paper presented at the 11th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna. February 14–17, 2004.
36.
KupischT.MüllerN.CantoneK. F. (2002). Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Comparing Italian and French. Lingue e linguaggio, 1, 107–149.
37.
MacWhinneyB.SnowC. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271–296.
38.
Mel’cukI. A. (1974). Statistics and the relationship between the gender of French nouns and their endings. In RozencvejgV. J. (Ed.), Essays on lexical semantics: I (pp. 11–42). Stockholm, Sweden: Skriptor.
39.
MillsA. E. (1986). The acquisition of gender. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
40.
MöhringA. (2001). The acquisition of French by German children of pre-school age: an empirical investigation of gender assignment and gender agreement. In Foster-CohenS.NizegorodcewA. (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 2001, (Vol. 1, pp. 171–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41.
MüllerN. (1987). Der Genuserwerb im Französischen und Deutschen: Eine empirische Untersuchung eines bilingualen Kindes (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Hamburg, Germany.
42.
MüllerN. (1990). Developing two gender assignment systems simultaneously. In MeiselJ. M. (Ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children (pp. 193–294). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.
43.
MüllerN. (1994). Gender and number agreement within DP. In MeiselJ. M. (Ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children (pp. 53–88). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.
44.
MüllerN. (1995). L’acquisition du genre et du nombre chez des enfants bilingues (français/allemand) [The acquisition of gender and number in bilingual children (French/German)]. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 6, 65–99.
45.
MüllerN. (1999). Gender and number in acquisition. In UnterbeckB.RissanenM. (Eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition: Approaches to gender (Vol. I, pp. 351–399). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
46.
MüllerN.PillunatA. (2008). Balanced bilingual children with two weak languages: A French-German case study. In Guijarro-FuentesP.LarrañagaP.ClibbensJ. (Eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners (pp. 269–294). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
47.
Pérez-PereiraM. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571–590.
48.
PillunatA. (2007). Der Erwerb des Lexikons durch mehrsprachige Kinder: Französisch, Italienisch und Deutsch im Vergleich (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany.
49.
PizzutoE.CaselliM. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: Implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 491–557.
PrettoA. (1985). Il genere grammaticale [Grammatical gender]. In FranchiA.BellisDeSavoiaL. M. (Eds.), Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’ uso: Teorie e applicazioni descrittive (pp. 289–309). Roma, Italy: Bulzoni.
52.
PupierP. (1982). L’acquisition des déterminants français chez les petits enfants bilingues français – anglais. In PupierP.ConnorsK.LappinK.GreeneW.NuckleL. (Eds.), L’acquisition simultanée du français et de l’anglais chez des petits enfants de Montréal (pp. 173–214). Québec, Canada: Edition officiel du Québec.
RocaI. (1989). The organisation of grammatical gender. Transactions of the Philological Society, 87, 1–32.
55.
RossiC. (1967). French gender by sound. The French Review, 41, 340–343.
56.
SaportaS. (1962). On the expression of gender in Spanish. Romance Philology, 15, 279–284.
57.
SchubertM. (2003). Untersuchungen zu Genusregularitäten einsilbiger Nomina der französischen Gegenwartssprache (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universität Hamburg, Germany.
58.
SéguinH. (1969). Les marques du genre dans le lexique du français écrit contemporain: Compilation des cas et essai de classement (Mémoire de D.E.S.). University de Montréal, Montréal Québec.
59.
SerratriceL. (2000). The emergence of functional categories in bilingual first language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, UK.
60.
SolerR. (1984). Adquisición y utilisazión del articulo [Acquisition and use of the article]. In SiguánM. (Ed.), Estudios sobre psicología del lenguaje infantile (pp. 140–165). Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
61.
SurridgeM. E. (1982). L’attribution du genre grammatical aux emprunts anglais en français canadien: Le rôle des homologues et des monosyllabes [The attribution of grammatical gender to English loan words in Canadian French: The role of homologue and monosyllabic expressions]. Glossa, 16, 28–39.
62.
SurridgeM. E. (1984). Le genre grammatical des emprunts anglais en français: Le perspectif diachronique. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 58–72.
63.
SurridgeM. E. (1985). Le genre grammatical des composés en français [Grammatical gender of compounds in French]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 30, 247–271.
64.
SurridgeM. E. (1986). Genre grammatical et dérivation lexicale en français [Grammatical gender and lexical derivation in French]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 31, 267–284.
65.
SurridgeM. E. (1989a). Grammaire et phylogenèse: Le genre des animés humain en français [Grammar and phylogenesis: The gender of human animates in French]. Actes de langue française et de linguistique, 2, 129–142.
66.
SurridgeM. E. (1989b). Le facteur sémantique dans l’attribution du genre aux inanimés en français [The semantic factor in the attribution of gender to inanimates in French]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 19–44.
67.
SurridgeM. E. (1989c). Le genre grammatical en français fondamental: Données de base pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage. [Grammatical gender in fundamental French: Basic data for teaching and learning]. La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 45(4), 664–674.
68.
SurridgeM. E. (1993). Gender assignment in French: The hierarchy of rules and the chronology of acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 77–95.
69.
SurridgeM. E. (1996). Le ou La? The Gender of French Nouns. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
70.
SurridgeM. E.LessardG. (1984). Pour une prise de conscience du genre grammatical [For an awareness of grammatical gender]. La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 41, 43–52.
71.
TaftM.MeunierF. (1998). Lexical representation of gender: A quasi-regular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 23–45.
72.
TeschnerR. V.RusselW. M. (1984). The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: An inverse dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 115–132.
73.
TuckerG. R.LambertW. E.RigaultA. A. (1977). The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
74.
TuckerG. R.LambertW. W.RigaultA. A.SegalowitzN. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 312–316.
75.
WienoldG. (1970). Double gender and change of gender. In GrauerA. (Ed.), Actes du Xè Congrès International des Linguistes (Vol. IV, pp. 397–402). Bucarest, Romania: Editions de l’Académie de la République Socialiste de Roumanie.
76.
YaguellaM. (1978). Les mots et les femmes [The words and the women]. Paris, France: Payot.
77.
ZubinD.A.KöpckeK.M. (1983). Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomina der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [The cognitive organisation of gender assignment to monosyllabic nouns in modern German]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik11(2), 166–182.
78.
ZubinD.KöpckeK.-M. (1984). Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua, 63, 41–96.
