In this study, we test the hypothesis that code-switching leads to phonological convergence by examining voice onset time (VOT) realization in the spontaneous code-switched speech of New Mexican Spanish-English bilinguals. We find that average VOT duration values in New Mexican Spanish fall within the range typical of non-contact varieties of the language, while New Mexican English displays VOT values in the low range of typical non-contact English. When we examine the VOT values of Spanish- and English-language words at varying degrees of proximity to code-switch points, we find a similar asymmetry. In Spanish, no effect of recent code-switching is evident. In English, conversely, close proximity to code-switch points results in a significant reduction in VOT values, i.e. in the direction of Spanish. We argue that while the data studied here do not directly demonstrate a causal connection between code-switching and long-term phonological convergence, they would not be inconsistent with such a view. We discuss a number of possible causes for the observed asymmetry between Spanish and English.
AaronJ. E. (2015). Lone English-Origin Nouns in Spanish: The Precedence of Community Norms. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 459–480.
2.
AaronJ. E. (2004). “So respetamos un tradición del uno al otro”: So and entonces in New Mexican Bilingual Discourse. Spanish in Context, 1(2), 161–179.
3.
AbramsonA. S.LiskerL. (1973). Voice-timing perception in Spanish word-initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 1–8.
4.
AikhenvaldA. Y. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AmengualM. (2012). Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(03), 517–530.
6.
AntoniouM.BestC. T.TylerM. D.KroosC. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 558–570.
7.
BaayenH. (2011). Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics.”Cambridge, UK; New York:Cambridge University Press.
8.
BackusA. (2004). Convergence as a mechanism of language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 179–181.
9.
BackusA. (2005). Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another?International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3-4), 307–340.
BillsG. D.VigilN. A. (1999). Ashes to ashes: The historical basis for dialect variation in New Mexican Spanish. Romance Philology, 53(1), 43–66.
13.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
14.
Borzone de ManriqueA.GurlekianJ. (1980). Rasgos acústicos de las consonantes oclusivas españolas. Revista Fonoaudiológica, 26, 326–330.
15.
BullockB. E. (2009). Phonetic reflexes of code-switching. In BullockB. E.ToribioA. J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 163–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BullockB. E.ToribioA. J. (2004). Introduction: Convergence as an emergent property in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 91–93.
17.
BullockB. E.ToribioA. J. (2009). Trying to hit a moving target: On the sociophonetics of code-switching. In IsurinL.WinfordD.De BotK. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Code Switching (pp. 189–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
18.
BullockB. E.ToribioA. J.GonzálezV.DalolaA. (2006). Language Dominance and Performance Outcomes in Bilingual Pronunciation. In Granthem O’BrienM.SheaC.ArchibaldJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA) (pp. 9–16). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
19.
ClyneM. (2003). Dynamics of Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DaviesM. (2008-). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present, Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
22.
De LeeuwE.MennenI.ScobbieJ. M. (2012). Dynamic systems, maturational constraints and L1 phonetic attrition. International Journal of Bilingualism, Online(September), 1–18.
23.
Du BoisJ. W.Schuetze-CoburnS.CummingS.PaolinoD. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription.In EdwardsJ.LampertM. (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse (pp. 45–89). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
FlegeJ. E.EeftingW. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: evidence for phonetic category formation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(2), 729–740.
25.
FlegeJ. E.MunroM. J.MacKayI. R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5 Pt 1), 3125–3134. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7759652
26.
FlegeJ. E.SchirruC.MacKayI. R. A. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40(4), 467–491.
27.
FlegeJ. E.Yeni-KomshianG. H.LiuS. (1999). Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78–104.
28.
FowlerC. A.SramkoV.OstryD. J.RowlandS. A.HalléP. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 649–663.
29.
GimsonA. C. (1962). Introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: E Arnold.
30.
Gonzales VelásquezM. D. (1995). Sometimes Spanish, sometimes English: Language use among rural New Mexican Chicanas. In HallK.BucholtzM. (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 421–446). New York: Routledge.
31.
Gonzales VelásquezM. D. (1999). Crossing social and cultural borders: The road to language hybridity. In GalindoL.Gonzales VelásquezM. D. (Eds.), Speaking Chicana (pp. 13–38). Arizona, USA: University of Arizona Press.
32.
GrosjeanF.MillerJ. L. (1994). Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychological Science, 5(4), 201–206.
GumperzJ. J.WilsonR. (1971). Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan / Dravidian border in India. In HymesD. (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages (pp. 151–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HlavacJ. (2003). Second-generation speech: Lexicon, code-switching, and morpho-syntax of Croatian- English bilinguals. Berlin and New York: Peter Lang.
36.
JohnsonD. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383.
37.
KessingerR. H.BlumsteinS. E. (1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time and vowel production: Some implications for perception studies. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 117–128.
38.
KhattabG. (2009). Phonetic accommodation in children’s code-switching. In BullockB. E.ToribioA. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching (pp. 142–160). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
39.
KrollJ. F.DussiasP. E.BogulskiC. A.Valdes KroffJ. R. (2012). Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 229–262.
40.
LipskiJ. M. (2008). Traditional Varieties: New Mexico and Louisiana. In Varieties of Spanish in the United States (pp. 191–222). Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
41.
LiskerL.AbramsonA. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.
42.
MacSwanJ.ColinaS. (2005). Phonological Effects in Intrasentential Code-switching. Presentation at Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia (PaPI).
43.
MichnowiczJ.CarpenterL. (2013). Voiceless stop aspiration in Yucatan Spanish: A sociolinguistic analysis. Spanish in Context, 10(3), 410–437.
44.
MillerJ. L.GreenK. P.ReevesA. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43, 106–115.
45.
MuyskenP. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Myers-ScottonC. (2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
NagyN.KochetovA. (2013). VOT across the generations: A cross-linguistic study of contact-induced change. In SiemundP.GogolinI.SchulzM.DavydovaJ. (Eds.), Multilingualism and language contact in urban areas: Acquisition - Development - Teaching - Communication (pp. 19–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
48.
OlsonD. J. (2012). The phonetics of insertional code-switching: Suprasegmental analysis and a case for hyper-articulation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(4), 439–457.
49.
OlsonD. J. (2013). Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 407–420.
50.
PedrazaD.SuárezW. (2012). Code-switching effects on the phonetic realization of /k/ by naturalistic Spanish-English code-switchers. Presentation at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS), Gainesville, Florida.
51.
PiccininiP. E. (2011). The production of Spanish-English code-switching. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 2522–2522.
52.
PiccininiP. E. (2012). The Gradient Production of Spanish-English Code-switching. Poster presentation at the Annual LSA Meeting, Linguistics Society of America. Portland, Oregon.
53.
R Core Development Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
54.
SankoffD.PoplackS.VanniarajanS. (1990). The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change, 2, 71–101.
55.
SloetjesH.WittenburgP. (2008). Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
56.
SuárezW.PedrazaD. (2013). Phonetic Interactions in code-switching by Spanish-English naturalistic code-switchers. Presentation at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS). Ottawa, Canada.
57.
ToribioA. J.BullockB. E.BoteroC. G.DavisK. A. (2005). Perseverative phonetic effects in bilingual code-switching. In GessR.RubinE. (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics (pp. 291–306). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
58.
Torres CacoullosR.AaronJ. E. (2004). Bare English-origin nouns in Spanish: Rates, constraints, and discourse functions. Language Variation and Change, 15(03), 289–328.
59.
Torres CacoullosR.TravisC. E. (in preparation). New Mexico Spanish-English Bilingual (NMSEB) corpus. NSF#1019112/1019122. Retrieved from http://nmcode-switching.la.psu.edu/
60.
Torres CacoullosR.TravisC. E. (2011). Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(3), 241–267.
61.
Torres CacoullosR.TravisC. E. (2015). Gauging convergence on the ground: Code-switching in the community. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 365–386.
62.
TravisC. E.Torres CacoullosR. (2013). Making voices count: Corpus compilation in bilingual communities. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 170–194.
63.
VigilD. A. (2008). The Traditional Spanish of Taos, New Mexico: Acoustic, Phonetic, and Phonological Analyses. Indiana: Purdue University.
64.
WilsonD. V. (2013). One construction, two source languages: Hacer with an English infinitive in bilingual discourse. In CarvalhoA. M.BeaudrieS. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 123–134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
65.
WilsonD. V.DumontJ. (2015). The emergent grammar of bilinguals: The Spanish verb hacer ‘do’ with a bare English infinitive. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 444–458.
66.
WittemanM. J.van HellJ. G. (2009). Triggering effects on code-switching. In Paper presentation at 8th Dutch Endo-Neuro-Psycho Meeting. Doorwerth, Netherlands.
