Phonetic drift reveals interconnected phonological representations in simultaneous bilinguals: A case study of English and Czech stop consonants

Abstract

Purpose:

The interconnectedness of phonological categories between the two languages of early bilinguals has previously been explored using single-probe speech production and perception data. Our goal was to tap into bilingual phonological representations in another way, namely via monitoring instances of phonetic drift due to changes in language exposure.

Design:

We report a case study of two teenage English–Czech simultaneous bilinguals who live in Canada and spend summers in Czechia (Czech Republic). Voice onset time (VOT) of word-initial voiced and voiceless stops was measured upon the bilinguals’ arrival to and before their departure from a two-month stay in Czechia.

Data and Analysis:

Each bilingual read the same set of 71 Czech and 58 English stop-initial target words (and additional fillers) at each time of measurement. The measured VOT values were submitted to linear mixed effects models, assessing the effects of target language, measurement time, and underlying voicing.

Findings/Conclusions:

After the immersion in a Czech-speaking environment, for both speakers the count of voiced stops realized as prevoiced (i.e., having negative VOT) increased and the measured VOT of voiced stops (appearing different for English and Czech initially) drifted towards more negative (more Czech-like) values in both languages, while no change was detected for the voiceless stops of either English (aspirated) or Czech (unaspirated). The results suggest that the bilinguals maintain three-way VOT distinctions, differentiating voiceless aspirated (English), voiceless unaspirated (Czech), and voiced (English–Czech) stops, with connected bilingual representations of the voiced categories.

Originality:

Data on phonetic drift in simultaneous bilinguals proficient in their two languages have not previously been published.

Significance/Implications:

We show that observing phonetic shifts due to changes in the ambient linguistic environment can be revealing about the organization of phonological space in simultaneous bilinguals.

Keywords

Speech production phonological representation phonetic drift English–Czech simultaneous bilinguals voice onset time

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antoniou

Best

C. T.

Tyler

M. D.

Kroos

(2010). Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals’ productions in both L1 and L2. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 640–653.

Barlow

J. A.

Branson

P. E.

Nip

I. S.

(2013). Phonetic equivalence in the acquisition of /l/ by Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 68–85.

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.

Boersma

Weenink

(2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.04. www.praat.org/

Chang

C. B.

(2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268.

Chang

C. B.

(2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 520–533.

Chang

C.B.

(2019). Phonetic drift. In Schmid

M. S.

Köpke

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp. 191–203). Oxford University Press.

Cho

Ladefoged

(1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–229.

Cook

V. J.

(1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), 557–591.

10.

Cutler

(2012). Native listening: The flexibility dimension. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 169–187.

11.

Flege

J. E.

(1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47–65.

12.

Flege

J. E.

(1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange

(Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 229–273). York Press.

13.

Flege

J. E.

Eefting

(1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 67–83.

14.

Fowler

C. A.

Sramko

Ostry

D. J.

Rowland

S. A.

Hallé

(2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 649–663.

15.

Goldrick

Runnqvist

Costa

(2014). Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1031–1036.

16.

Grosjean

(1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36(1), 3–15.

17.

Hazan

V. L.

Boulakia

(1993). Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French–English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 36(1), 17–38.

18.

Jacobs

Fricke

Kroll

J. F.

(2016). Cross-language activation begins during speech planning and extends into second language speech. Language Learning, 66(2), 324–353.

19.

Johnson

C. E.

Wilson

I. L.

(2002). Phonetic evidence for early language differentiation: Research issues and some preliminary data. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 271–289.

20.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.

21.

Lenth

Singmann

Love

Buerkner

Herve

(2018). R package emmeans. Version 1.2.4. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/

22.

Machač

(2006). Temporální a spektrální struktura českých explozív [Temporal and spectral structure of Czech plosives]. Ph.D dissertation, Charles University, Faculty of Arts. https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/7718 [In Czech.]

23.

Mack

(1990). Phonetic transfer in a French–English bilingual child. In Nelde

P. H.

(Ed.), Language attitudes and language conflict (pp. 107–124). Bonn: Dümmler.

24.

Olson

D. J.

(2013). Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 407–420.

25.

Pardo

J. S.

(2013). Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 559.

26.

R Core Team. (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016. http://www.r-project.org/

27.

Sancier

M. L.

Fowler

C. A.

(1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436.

28.

Sebastián-Gallés

Echeverría

Bosch

(2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 240–255.

29.

Simon

(2010). Child L2 development: A longitudinal case study on Voice Onset Times in word-initial stops. Journal of Child Language, 37(1), 159–173.

30.

Simonet

(2010). Dark and clear laterals in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction of phonetic categories in early bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 663–678.

31.

Sundara

Polka

(2008). Discrimination of coronal stops by bilingual adults: The timing and nature of language interaction. Cognition, 106(1), 234–258.

32.

Sundara

Polka

Baum

(2006). Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114.

33.

Tobin

S. J.

Nam

Fowler

C. A.

(2017). Phonetic drift in Spanish–English bilinguals: Experiment and a self-organizing model. Journal of Phonetics, 65, 45–59.

34.

Yang

Fox

R. A.

Jacewicz

(2015). Vowel development in an emergent Mandarin–English bilingual child: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language, 42(5), 1125–1145.

35.

Yusa

Nasukawa

Koizumi

Kim

Kimura

Emura

(2010). Unexpected effects of the second language on the first. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk

Wrembel

Kul

(Eds.), New sounds 2010: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech (pp. 580–584). Adam Mickiewicz University.