This article focuses on the development of sociolinguistic competence in a second language, (here, French being acquired by young Anglo-Montrealers) in a naturalistic context where the target language is part of daily life. Sociolinguistic competence is assessed through analysis of Anglo-Montrealers’ use of a morphosyntactic variable, Future Temporal Reference (FTR), in both French and English. Variationist analyses reveal that Anglo-Montrealers possess distinct FTR variation systems for each of the languages of their linguistic repertoire. Results show that substantial contact with native speakers is a necessary condition for detailed and complete mastery of target sociolinguistic variation, in particular because the rules that govern it are rarely, if ever, explicitly taught.
AaronJ. (2006). Variation and change in Spanish future temporal expressions: Rates, constraints, and grammaticization. Unpublished dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
2.
BayleyR.PrestonD. R. (Eds.). (1996). Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3.
BayleyR.ReganV. (2004). Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 323–338.
4.
BélandN.ForguesÉ.BeaudinM. (2008). Évolution du salaire moyen des homes de langue maternelle française ou anglaise au Québec et au Nouveau-Brunswick, 1970–2000, Étude 13 Gouvernement du Québec. Retrieved June21, 2009 from http://www.olf.gouv.qc.ca/etudes/etude_13.pdf
5.
BlondeauH. (2006). La trajectoire de l’emploi du futur chez une cohorte de Montréalais francophones entre 1971 et 1995. Revue canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 9, 73–95.
6.
BlondeauH. (2008a). Normes identitaires et configuration de l’espace sociolinguistique. Le cas des jeunes Anglo-Montréalais. Cahiers de sociolinguistique, 13, 93–117.
7.
BlondeauH. (2008b). The dynamics of pronouns in the Québec languages in contact dynamics. In MeyerhoffM.NagyN. (Eds.), Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff (pp. 249–271). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
8.
BlondeauH. (2010). Bilingual language practices and identity construction: A generation of Anglophones in Montreal and its linguistic repertoire. In ReganV.Ni ChasaideC. (Eds.), Language practices and identity construction by Advanced L2 and L3 Speakers: The Acquisition of Sociostylistic Variants (pp. 81–105). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
9.
BlondeauH.FonollosaM.-O. (2009).The representations of French as part of the linguistic repertoire of young Anglo-Montrealers. Multilingua, 28, 402–424.
10.
BlondeauH.NagyN. (2008). Subordinate clause marking in Montreal Anglophone French and English. In MeyerhoffM.NagyN. (Eds.), Social Lives in Languages. Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff (pp. 273–313). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
11.
BlondeauH.NagyN.SankoffG.ThibaultP. (2002). La couleur locale des Anglo-Montréalais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 17, 73–100.
12.
BobergC. (2004a). Ethnic Patterns in the Phonetics of Montreal English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 538–568.
13.
BobergC. (2004b). Real and apparent time in language change: Late adoption of changes in Montreal English. American Speech, 79, 250–269.
14.
Branca-RosoffS. (2009). Corpus et recherches linguistiques sur le futur simple et du futur périphrastique. Association for French Language Studies, September2009, 3–5.
15.
ChevalierG. (1994). L’emploi des formes du futur dans le parler acadien du sud-est du Nouveau Brunswick. In DuboisL.BoudreauA. (Eds.), Les Acadiens et leur(s) langue(s): quand le Français est Minoritaire (pp. 75–89). Moncton, NB, Canada: Université de Moncton, Centre de Recherche en Linguistique appliquée.
16.
ComeauP. (2011). A window on the past, a move toward the future: Sociolinguistic and formal perspectives on Acadian French. Unpublished dissertation, York University, Toronto, Canada.
DewaeleJ.-M.MougeonR. (2002) Preface to the special issue: L’acquisition de la variation par les apprenants du français langue seconde. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 17, 3–5.
19.
DeshaiesS.LaforgeE. (1981). Le futur simple et le futur proche dans le français parlé dans la ville de Québec. Langues et Linguistique, 7, 21–37.
20.
EmirkanianL.SankoffD. (1985). Le futur ‘simple’ et le futur ‘proche.’ In LemieuxM.CedergrenH. (Eds.), Les tendances dynamiques du français parlé à MontréalVol. 1 (pp. 189–204). Québec: Office de la Langue Française.
21.
FirthA.WagnerH. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research, Modern Language, 81, 285–300.
22.
FleuryS.Branca-RosoffS. (2010). Une expérience de collaboration entre linguiste et spécialiste de TAL: L’exploitation du corpus CFPP 2000 en vue d’un travail sur l’alternance Futur simple/Futur périphrastique. Cahiers AFLS, 16, 63–98.
23.
FranckelJ.-J. (1984). Futur simple et futur proche. Le français dans le monde, 182, 65–70.
24.
GeneseeF. (1998). French immersion in Canada. In EdwardsJ. (Ed.), Language in Canada (pp. 305–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GrimmR. (2010). A real-time study of future temporal reference in spoken Ontarian French. In LernerM. (Ed.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16.2: Selected Papers from NWAV 38 (pp. 83–92). Philadelphia: ScholarlyCommon@Penn.
26.
GrimmD. R.NadasdiT. (2011). The Future of Ontario French. Journal of French Language Studies, 21(3), 1–17.
27.
JeanJeanC. (1988). Le futur simple et le futur périphrastique en français parlé, étude distributionnelle. In Blanche BenvenisteC.CheurelA.GrossM. (Eds.), Grammaire et histoire de la grammaire, Hommage à la mémoire de Jean Stéphanie (pp. 235–257). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.
28.
JedwabJ. (2006). Unpacking the diversity of Quebec Anglophones. Institut canadienne de recherche sur les minorities linguistiques. Moncton: Université de Moncton.
29.
KingR.NadasdiT. (2003). Back to the future in Acadian French. French Language Studies, 13, 323–337.
30.
LabovW. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31.
LamarreP. (2008). English Education in Quebec: Issues and Challenges. In BourhisR. Y. (Ed.), The vitality of the English speaking communities of Quebec: From community decline to revival (pp. 63–85). Montreal: Centre d’études ethniques des universities montréalaises (CEETUM), Université de Montréal.
32.
MougeonR.BeniakÉ. (1991). The linguistic consequences of language contact and restriction: The case of French in Ontario, Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
MougeonF.RehnerK. (2009a). From grade school to university. The variable use of on/nous by university FSL students. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 269–297.
34.
MougeonF.RehnerK. (2009b). Identity and nativelikeness in bilingual FSL learners. In ReganV.Ni ChasaideC. (Eds.), Language practices and identity construction in by Advanced L2 and L3 Speakers: The acquisition of sociostylistic variants (pp. 14–23). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
35.
MougeonR.NadasdiT.RehnerK. (2002). Etat de la recherche sur l’appropriation de la variation par les apprenants avancés du FL2 ou FLS. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 17, 7–50.
36.
MougeonR.NadasdiT.RehnerK. (2004). The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 408–432.
37.
MougeonR.NadasdiT.RehnerK. (2005). Contact-induced linguistic innovations on the continuum of language use: The case of French in Ontario. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(2), 99–115.
38.
MougeonR.NadasdiT.RehnerK. (2010). The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
39.
NadasdiT.MougeonR.RehnerK. (2003). Emploi du ‘futur’ dans le français parlé des élèves d’immersion française. Journal of French Language Studies, 13(2), 195–219.
40.
NagyN.BlondeauH.AugerJ. (2003). Second language variation and ‘real’ French: An investigation of subject doubling in the French of Montreal Anglophones. Language, Variation and Change, 15(1), 73–103.
PoplackS.DionN. (2009). Prescription vs praxis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language, 85, 557–587.
43.
PoplackS.LeveyS. (2010). Contact-induced grammatical change. In AuerP.SchmidtJ. E. (Eds.), Language and Space –An international handbook of linguistic variation: Volume 1 – Theories and methods (pp. 391–419). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
44.
PoplackS.MalvarE. (2007). Elucidating the transition period in language change. Probus, 19, 121–169.
45.
PoplackS.TagliamonteS. (1999). The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11, 315–342.
46.
PoplackS.TagliamonteS. (2001). African-American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
47.
PoplackS.TurpinD. (1999). Does the Futur have a future in (Canadian) French?Probus, 11, 133–164.
48.
PoplackS.WalkerJ.MalcolmsonR. (2006). An English like no other? Language contact and chance in Quebec, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 51(2), 185–213.
49.
PoplackS.WalkerJ.Torres CacoullosR. (2004, April). Looking into the future in English and French. The role of minority status in language contact and change: The past and the future in Canada. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium 15. University of Newcastle, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
50.
PoplackS.ZentzL.DionN. (2012). Phrase-final prepositions in Quebec French: An empirical study of contact, code-switching and resistence to convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(2), 203–225.
51.
ReganV. (2002). Le contexte d’acquisition: La variation du groupe et de l’individu. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 17, 123–141.
52.
ReganV. (2003). L’acquisition de la variation native par les apprenants L2 pendant un séjour dans la communauté linguistique et dans la salle de classe: Le cas des apprenants irlandais du français langue seconde. Journal of Educational Thought/Revue de la Pensée Éducative37(3) [Ed. S. Roy], 283–301.
53.
ReganV. (2005). From speech community back to classroom: What variation analysis can tell us about the role of context in the acquisition of French as a foreign language. In DewaeleJ. M. (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 191–209). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
54.
ReganV.HowardM.LemeeI. (2009). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
55.
ReganV.Ni ChasaideC. (2009). Introduction. In ReganV.Ni ChasaideC. (Eds.), Language practices and identity construction in by advanced L2 and L3 speakers: The acquisition of sociostylistic variants (pp. 1–10). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
56.
RobertsN. (2011). Le futur commence après la fin de cette phrase. The future of French future. Paper presented at NWAV 40. Georgetown University, Washington DC.
57.
SankoffG.Evans WagnerS. (2006). Age grading in retrograde movement: The inflected future in Montréal French. In FriesnerM. L.RavindranathM. (Eds.), U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12.2 : Selected Papers from NWAV 34 (pp. 1–14). Philadelphia: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.
58.
SankoffD.TagliamonteS.SmithE. (2005). Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for the Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
59.
SankoffG.ThibaultP.NagyN.BlondeauH.FonollosaM.-O.GagnonL. (1997). Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change, 9, 191–217.
60.
Statistique Canada (2001). Recensement 2001: Série « Analyses » Profil des langues au Canada: l’anglais, le français et bien d’autres langues, No 97F0030XIF2001003.
61.
TagliamonteS. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillP.Schilling-EstesN. (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 729–763). Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
62.
TagliamonteS. (2006). Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
TaroneE. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research 1997–2007. Modern Language Journal, 91, 837–848.
64.
ThibaultP.SankoffG. (1993). Diverses facettes de l’insécurité linguistique. Cahier de l’Institut de linguistique de Louvain, 19(3–4), 209–218.
65.
ThibaultP.SankoffG. (1999). L’évaluation du français des jeunes Anglo-montréalais par leurs pairs francophones. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 245–281.
66.
ThibaultP.VincentD. (1990). Un corpus de français parlé. Montréal 84: Histoire, méthodes et perspectives de recherche Québec: Département de langues et linguistique, Université Laval.
67.
Torres CacoullosR.WalkerJ. (2009). The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocation in discourse. Language, 85, 321–354.
68.
Van ComperolleR.WilliamsL. (2009). Variable omission of ne in real-time French chat: A corpus-driven comparison of educational and non-educational contexts. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 413–440.
69.
WagnerS.SankoffG. (2011). Age grading in the Montréal French Inflected Future. Language Variation and Change, 23, 275–313
70.
ZimmerD. (1994). Le future simple et le future périphrastique dans le français parlé de Montréal. Langue et Linguistique, 20, 213–225.
