How stable or how permeable to attrition are a multilingual’s first and second languages during life periods characterized by dynamic changes in language-use frequencies? This longitudinal study sheds some light on this issue by investigating changing patterns in a multilingual speaker’s tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states. Over a period of 10 years, the multilingual recorded more than 100 TOT states, together with 400 non-target word associations, as they occurred with words from the speaker’s five languages (L1 German, L2 Russian, L3 English, L4 Spanish, and L5 Portuguese). During the period, the L1 was consistently used less than the L3 and L4, providing a setting in which L1 attrition might occur. Data were analyzed with respect to the changing frequencies of TOT state occurrence in the different languages, the contribution of each language to the word associations generated during word search, the typological relatedness of targets and associates, and the linguistic context of initial learning of each language. Rates of TOT states and percentages of cross-language word associations and within-language word associations fluctuated in response to dynamic patterns of language use and maintenance, demonstrating the value of data on word-retrieval failure for studies of language attrition. The data reveal that the speaker’s L1 appeared to gain stability after an early period suggestive of attrition, despite low frequency of use overall. This finding supports the view that the L1 is exceptional, highly resistant to attrition, but also suggests that temporary impairment of L1 can occur when a multilingual speaker’s overall set of interacting language systems comes out of balance.
AmmerlaanT. (1996). You get it a bit wobbly… Exploring bilingual lexical retrieval in the context of first language attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
2.
BrownA. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 202–223.
3.
BrownR.McNeillD. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337.
4.
BurkeD. M.MacKayD. G.WorthleyJ. S.WadeE. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 542–579.
5.
CohenA. D. (1989). Attrition in the productive lexicon of two Portuguese third-language speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 135–149.
6.
CohenA. D. (1996). Verbal reports as a source of insights into second language learner strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7, 5–24.
7.
CookV. (Ed.). (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8.
De AngelisG. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
9.
De BotK. (2007). Dynamic systems theory, lifespan development and language attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM. S.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 53–68). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
10.
De BotK. (2011). Epilogue. In VerspoorM. H.de BotK.LowieW. (Eds.). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 123–127). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
11.
De BotK.ClyneM. (1994). A 16-year longitudinal study of language attrition in Dutch immigrants in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15, 17–28.
12.
De BotK.LowieW.VerspoorM. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.
13.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2001). Activation or inhibition? The interaction of L1, L2 and L3 on the language mode continuum. In CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 69–89). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14.
EckeP. (2001). Lexical retrieval in a third language: Evidence from errors and tip-of-the-tongue states. In CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Aspects of L3 Acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 90–114). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
15.
EckeP. (2004a). Language attrition and theories of forgetting: A cross-disciplinary review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 321–354.
16.
EckeP. (2004b). Words on the tip of the tongue: A study of lexical retrieval failures in Spanish-English bilinguals. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 23, 33–63.
17.
EckeP. (2009). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon as a window on (bilingual) lexical retrieval. In PavlenkoA. (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 185–208). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18.
FaingoldE. (1999). The re-emergence of Spanish and Hebrew in a multilingual adolescent. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2, 283–295.
19.
GollanT. H.AcenasL. A. (2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects in tip-of-the-tongue status in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 246–269.
20.
GollanT. H.BonnaniM. P.MontoyaR. I. (2005). Proper names get stuck on bilingual and monolingual speakers’ tip of the tongue equally often. Neuropsychology, 19, 278–287.
21.
GoralM.LevyE. S.OblerL. K.CohenE. (2006). Cross-language lexical connections in the mental lexicon: Evidence from a case of trilingual aphasia. Brain and Language, 98, 235–247.
22.
GreenD. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81.
23.
GrosjeanF. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–25). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
HallC. J.EckeP. (2003). Parasitism as a default mechanism in vocabulary acquisition. In CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 71–85). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
25.
HallC. J.NewbrandD.EckeP.SperrU.MarchandV.HayesL. (2009). Learners’ implicit assumptions about syntactic frames in new L3 words: The role of cognates, typological proximity and L2 status. Language Learning, 59, 153–202.
26.
HerdinaP.JessnerU. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
27.
HerwigA. (2001). Plurilingual lexical organization: Evidence from lexical processing in L1-L2-L4 translation. In CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic aspects of L3 acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 115–137). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
28.
HulstijnJ. H. (2008). Measuring second language proficiency. In BlomE.UnsworthS. (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
29.
HyltenstamK.VibergÅ. (Eds.). (1993). Progression and regression in language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
JessnerU. (2003). A dynamic approach to language attrition in multilingual systems. In CookV. (Ed.), The effect of the second language on the first (pp. 234–246). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
31.
ParadisM. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
32.
PavlenkoA. (2004). L2 influence and L1 attrition in adult bilingualism. In SchmidM. S.KöpkeB.KeijzerM.WeilemarL. (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 47–59). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
33.
PyersJ. E.GollanT. H.EmmoreyK. (2009). Bimodal bilinguals reveal the source of tip-of-the-tongue states. Cognition, 112, 323–329.
34.
ReasonJ. T.LucasD. (1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In HarrisJ. E.MorrisP. E. (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions, and absent-mindedness (pp. 53–69). London, UK: Academic Press.
35.
RossJ. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 11(10). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10.
36.
SchmidM. S. (2007). The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 135–153). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
37.
SchmidM. S.KöpkeB. (2007). Bilingualism and attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM. S.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 209–238). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
38.
SchmidM. S.KöpkeB. (2008). L1 attrition and the mental lexicon. In PavlenkoA. (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 209–238). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
39.
SchwartzB. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
ShanonB. (1991). Faulty language selection in polyglots. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 339–350.
41.
SingletonD. (1987). Mother and other tongue influences on learner French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 327–345.
42.
WaasM. (1996). Language attrition downunder: German speakers in Australia. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
43.
WeltensB.GrendelM. (1993). Attrition of vocabulary knowledge. In SchreuderR.WeltensB. (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 135–156). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
44.
WenzlA. (1932). Empirische und theoretische Beiträge zur Erinnerungsarbeit bei erschwerter Wortfindung. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 85, 181–218.
