Using whole-word production measures to determine the influence of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on bilingual speech production

Abstract

Numerous lexical and sublexical factors have been reported to influence speech production in monolinguals (Storkel, 2001; Vitevitch, 2002); however, whole-word production analyses have rarely been used to measure such influences. The present study investigated the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on bilingual speech production using whole-word production measures (Ingram, 2002). Five typically developing English–Spanish bilingual children were administered a picture-naming task in English and Spanish in which stimuli varied in sublexical and lexical parameters. Their English and Spanish productions were compared with those of five age-matched monolingual English- and Spanish-speaking children, respectively. No differences were found between bilinguals and monolinguals in the respective languages; however, bilinguals evidenced greater phonological complexity in Spanish than English on words with low phonotactic probability and low neighborhood density. Whole-word approximation remained similar between languages. Findings are interpreted in the context of crosslinguistic influences of sublexical and lexical factors on speech production.

Keywords

bilingual neighborhood density phonotactic probability whole-word production

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bard

Shillcock

(1993). Competitor effects during lexical access: Chasing Zipf’s tail. In Altmann

Shillcock

(Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 235–275). Hove: Erlbaum.

Barlow

J. A.

(2003a). Assessment of English phonology. School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University. San Diego, CA: Phonological Typologies Laboratory.

Barlow

J. A.

(2003b). Assessment of Spanish phonology – Revised. School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University. San Diego, CA: Phonological Typologies Laboratory.

Baus

Costa

Carreiras

(2008). Neighbourhood density and frequency effects in speech production: A case for interactivity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 866–888.

Brown

(1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bunta

Davidovich

Ingram

(2006). The relationship between the phonological complexity of a bilingual child’s words and those of the target languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10, 71–88.

Bunta

Fabiano-Smith

Goldstein

Ingram

(2009). Phonological whole-word measures in 3-year-old bilingual children and their age-matched monolingual peers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23, 156–175.

Carreiras

Perea

(2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393–400.

Coady

J. A.

Aslin

R. N.

(2004). Young children’s sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 183–213.

10.

Davis

C. J.

Perea

(2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671.

11.

Dell

G. S.

(1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313–349.

12.

Fabiano

(2006). Phonological representation in Spanish–English bilingual children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

13.

Freedman

S. E.

Barlow

J. A.

(2008). Influence of lexical and sublexical factors on Spanish word naming. Poster session presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Convention, Chicago, IL, November 2008.

14.

Gaygen

D. E.

(1998). Effects of phonotactic probability on the recognition of words in continuous speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Buffalo, NY.

15.

Gerken

McGregor

K. K.

(1998). An overview of prosody and its role in normal and disordered child language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 38–48.

16.

Goldstein

Washington

P. S.

(2001). An initial investigation of phonological patterns in typically developing 4-year-old Spanish–English bilingual children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 153–164.

17.

Gutiérrez-Clellen

V. F.

Kreiter

(2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288.

18.

Hualde

J. I.

(1997). Spanish /i/ and related sounds: An exercise in phonemic analysis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 27, 61–79.

19.

Hualde

J. I.

(2004). Quasi-phonemic contrasts in Spanish. In Chand

Chand

Kelleher

Rodríguez

Schmesier

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 374–398). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

20.

Hualde

Simonet

Torreira

(2008). Postlexical contraction of nonhigh vowels in Spanish. Lingua, 118, 1906–1925.

21.

Ingram

(2002). The measurement of whole-word productions. Journal of Child Language, 29, 713–733.

22.

Ingram

(2001). A whole-word approach to phonological analysis and intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 32, 271–283.

23.

Jescheniak

J. D.

Levelt

W. J. M.

(1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824–843.

24.

Jusczyk

P. W.

Luce

P. A.

Charles-Luce

(1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.

25.

Kehoe

M. M.

(2001). Prosodic patterns in children’s multisyllabic word productions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 284–294.

26.

Keshavarz

Ingram

(2002). The early phonological development of a Farsi–English bilingual child. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 255–269.

27.

Klein

H. B.

(2005). Reduplication revisited: Functions, constraints, repairs, and clinical implications. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 71–83.

28.

Levelt

W. J. M.

Wheeldon

(1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.

29.

Luce

P. A.

Pisoni

D. B.

(1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36.

30.

Mattys

S. L.

Jusczyk

P. W.

Luce

P. A.

Morgan

J. L.

(1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 465–494.

31.

Newman

R. S.

German

D. J.

(2002). Effects of lexical factors on lexical access among typical language-learning children and children with word-finding difficulties. Language and Speech, 45, 285–317.

32.

Newman

R. S.

German

D. J.

(2005). Lifespan effects of lexical factors on oral naming. Language and Speech, 48, 123–156.

33.

Paradis

(1996). Phonological differentiation in a bilingual child: Hildegard revisited. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, 20, 528–539.

34.

Paradis

(2001). Do bilingual two-year-olds have separate phonological systems? International Journal of Bilingualism, 5, 19–38.

35.

Paradis

Genesee

(1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25.

36.

Pisoni

D. B.

Nusbaum

H. C.

Luce

P. A.

Slowiaczek

L. M.

(1985). Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication, 4, 75–95.

37.

Saaristo-Helin

(2009). Measuring phonological development: A follow-up study of five children acquiring Finnish. Language and Speech, 52, 55–77.

38.

Storkel

H. L.

(2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321–1337.

39.

Storkel

H. L.

(2003). Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1312–1323.

40.

Storkel

H. L.

(2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201–221.

41.

Vaden

K. I.

Halpin

H. R.

(2004). Irvine phonotactic online dictionary, Version 1.0. (Data file). Retrieved October 2011, from http://www.iphod.com

42.

Velleman

S. L.

Vihman

M. M.

(2002). Whole-word phonology and templates: Trap, bootstrap, or some of each? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 33, 9–23.

43.

Vihman

M. M.

(1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

44.

Vitevitch

M. S.

(2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 735–747.

45.

Vitevitch

M. S.

Luce

P. A.

(1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.

46.

Vitevitch

M. S.

Luce

P. A.

(1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374–408.

47.

Vitevitch

M. S.

Luce

P. A.

Pisoni

D. B.

Auer

E. T.

(1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306–311.

48.

Vitevitch

M. S.

Rodríguez

(2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 64–73.

49.

Vitevitch

M. S.

Sommers

M. S.

(2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 31, 491–504.

50.

Vitevitch

M. S.

Stamer

M. K.

(2006). The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 760–770.

51.

Walley

A. C.

Metsala

J. L.

(1992). Young children’s perception of spoken words varying in age-of-acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 171–182.