Two perceptual tests, designed to investigate the discrimination of the singleton/geminate consonant contrast, were submitted to bilingual English—Lucchese immigrants in the USA, and monolingual Lucchese subjects. The study has two major goals. The first goal is to add a much-needed empirical contribution to the incredibly sparse literature on phonological/phonetic attrition in bilinguals. The second goal is to cast the analysis of phonological attrition for socio-linguistic reasons on a more general psycholinguistic framework for cross-language speech perception. As will be shown, the comparison between the performances of different groups of speakers in different perceptual tasks allowed us to verify that phonological attrition moves along patterns of perceptual sensitivity which can be fruitfully compared with those surfacing in L1/L2 phonological acquisition.
Albano Leoni, F., & Maturi, P. ( 2002). Manuale di fonetica. Roma: Carocci.
2.
Ambrosini, R. ( 1974). Sul dialetto lucchese. Rivista di Archeologia , Storia, Economia e Costume, 2(3-4), 31-35.
3.
Andersen, R.W. ( 1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition . In R. Lambert & B. Freed (Eds.), The loss of language skills (pp. 83-118). Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.
4.
Bertinetto, P.M., & Loporcaro, M. ( 2005). The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 131-151.
5.
Bertinetto, P.M., & Vivalda, E. ( 1978). Recherches sur la perception des oppositions de quantité en italien. Journal of Italian Linguistics , 3, 97-116.
6.
Best, C. ( 1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 167-200). Timonium, MD : York Press.
7.
Best, C.T., Mcroberts, G.W. & Sithole, N.M. ( 1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu clicks discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345-360.
8.
Bullock, B.E., & Gerfen, C. ( 2004). Frenchville French: A case study in phonological attrition . International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 303-320.
9.
Bullock, B.E., Toribio, A.J., González, V., & Dalola, A. ( 2006). Language Dominance and performance outcomes in bilingual pronunciation. In M. Grantham O’Brien , C. Shea & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 9-16). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
10.
Campbell, L., & Muntzel, M. ( 1989). The structral consequences of language death. In N. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 181-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Celata, C. ( 2004). Acquisizione e mutamento di categorie fonologiche. Le affricate in italiano. Milano: Franco Angeli.
12.
Celata, C., & Kaeppeli, B. ( 2003). Affricazione e rafforzamento in italiano. Alcuni dati sperimentali. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica della SNS, 4.
13.
Cook, E.-D. ( 1989). Is phonology going haywire in dying languages? Phonological variations in Chipewyan and Sarcee. Language in Society, 18, 235-255.
14.
Dorian, N. ( 1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
Dressler, U.W. ( 1972). On the phonology of language death. Proceedings of the Chigaco Linguistics Society, 8, 448- 449.
16.
Flege, J.E. ( 1987). The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language. Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification . Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47-65.
17.
Flege, J.E. ( 1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of Acoustical Society of America , 93, 1589-1608.
18.
Giannelli, L. ( 2000). Toscana. Pisa: Pacini.
19.
Graff, D., Labov, W., & Harris, W.A. ( 1986). Testing listeners’ reaction to phonological markers of ethnic identity: A new method for sociolinguistic research. In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Diversity and diachrony (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
20.
Guion, S.G., Flege, J.E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J.C. ( 2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711-2724.
21.
Kuhl, P.K. ( 1991). Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not . Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
22.
Ladefoged, P. ( 1999). ‘American English’. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (pp. 41- 44). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
23.
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. ( 1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
Li, WEI ( 1994). Three generations two languages one family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
25.
Loporcaro, M. ( 1996). On the analysis of geminate in Standard Italian and Italian dialects. In B. Hurch & R. Rhodes (Eds.), Natural phonology: The state of the art. Papers from the Bern Workshop on Natural Phonology, September 1989 (pp. 153-187). Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
26.
Major, R.C. ( 2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Major, R.C. ( 2005). First language attrition research. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on First Language Attrition , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 17-20 August 2005.
28.
Marotta, G. ( 1985) Modelli e misure ritmiche. La durata vocalica in italia no. Bologna: Zanichelli .
29.
Marotta, G. ( 1995). ‘Apocope nel parlato di Toscana’. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 24, 297-322.
30.
Miller, J.L. & Eimas, P. ( 1994). Observations on speech perception, its development, and the search for a meaning. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 37-56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Mora, J.C. ( 2005). Lexical knowledge effects on the discrimination of non-native phonemic contrasts in words and nonwords by Spanish/Catalan bilingual learners of English. ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception (PSP 2005). London, 15-17 June 2005 .
32.
Muljačić, Ž. (1969). Fonologia generale e fonologia della lingua italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.
33.
Muljačić, Ž. (1972). Fonologia della lingua italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.
34.
Payne, E.M. ( 2005). Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination . Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35, 153-181.
35.
Pickett, E.R., Blumstein, S. & Burton, M. ( 1999). Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate contrast in Italian. Phonetica, 56, 135-157.
36.
Pieri, S. ( 1890). Fonetica del dialetto lucchese. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 12, 107-126.
37.
Repp, B. ( 1981). Two strategies in fricative discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 217-227.
38.
Roach, P. ( 2000). English phonetics and phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Rohlfs, G. ( 1966). Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Fonetica. Torino: Einaudi.
40.
Saiu, E. ( 2004). Sull’origine d’una peculiarità del raddoppiamento fonosintattico in area lucchese. L’Italia Dialettale, 65, 123-130.
41.
Scaglione, S. ( 2000). Attrition. Mutamenti sociolinguistici nel lucchese di San Francisco. Milano: Franco Angeli .
42.
Schmid, M. S., Kopke, B. , Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L. (Eds.), (2004). First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
43.
Schmid, S. ( 2005). Code-switching and Italian abroad. Reflections on language contact and bilingual mixture. Italian Journal of Linguistics , 17(1), 113-155.
44.
Schmidt, A. ( 1985a). The fate of ergativity in dying Dyirbal. Language, 61, 378-397.
45.
Schmidt, A. ( 1985b). Young people’s Dyirbal. An example of language death from Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Stager, C.L., & Werker, J.F. ( 1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381-382.
47.
Werker, J.F. ( 1994). Cross-language speech perception: Developmental change does not involve loss. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 93-120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Werker, J.F., & Polka, L. ( 1993). The ontogeny and developmental significance of language-specific phonetic perception. In B. de Boysson-Bardies , S. de Schonen , P. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 275-288). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49.
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. ( 1984a). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 75, 1866-1876.
50.
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. ( 1984b). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development, 7, 49-63.
51.
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. ( 1999). Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 509-535.
52.
Westbury, J.R., Hashi, M., & Lindstrom, M.J. (1998). Differences among speakers in lingual articulation forAmerican English /r/. Speech Communication, 26, 203-226.
53.
Wolfram, W., & Schilling-Estes, N. (1998). American English: Dialects and variation. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.
