The present study seeks to answer the question of whether consonant duration is perceived differently across consonants of different manners of articulation and in different contextual environments and whether such differences may be related to the typology of geminates. The results of the cross-linguistic identification experiment suggest higher perceptual acuity in labeling short and long consonants in sonorants than in obstruents. Duration categories were also more consistently and clearly labeled in the intervocalic than in the preconsonantal environment, in the word-initial than in the word-final position, and after stressed vowels than between unstressed vowels. These perceptual asymmetries are in line with some typological tendencies, such as the cross-linguistic preference for intervocalic and post-stress geminates, but contradict other proposed cross-linguistic patterns, such as the preference for obstruent geminates and the abundance of word-final geminates.
AbramsonA. S. (1991). Amplitude as a cue to word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay. In Proceedings of the 12th ICPhS, Aix-en-Provence, August 1991, pp. 98–101.
2.
AbramsonA. S. (1999). Fundamental Frequency as a cue to word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay. In Proceedings of the 14th ICPhS, Berkeley, August 1999, pp. 591–594.
3.
AbramsonA. S. (2003). Acoustic cues to word-initial stop length in Pattani Malay. In Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 387–390.
4.
Aliaga-GarcíaC.MoraJ. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production, 231.
5.
AoyamaK. (2001). A psycholinguistic perspective on Finnish and Japanese prosody: Perception, production and child acquisition of consonantal quantity distinctions. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
ArmostiS. (2009). The Phonetics of Plosive and Affricate Gemination in Cypriot Greek. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
8.
ArvanitiA.TserdanelisG. (2000). On the phonetics of geminates: evidence from Cypriot Greek. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 2, 559–562.
BorgA. (1997). Maltese phonology. In KayeA. S. (Ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa (pp. 245–285). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
16.
BradleyT. (2001). The phonetics and phonology of rhotic duration contrast and neutralization. PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.
17.
BuderE. H.Stoel-GammonC. (2002). American and Swedish children’s acquisition of vowel duration: Effects of vowel identity and final stop voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1854–1864.
18.
ByrdD. (1993). 54,000 American stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 83, 97–115.
19.
ChenM. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159.
20.
ChoT.KeatingP. (2009). Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 466–485.
21.
CowellM. (1964). A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Based on the dialect of Damascus. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
22.
DalalD. K.ZickarM. J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 339–362.
23.
DavisS. (1994). Geminate consonants in moraic phonology. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 13, 32–45.
24.
DavisS. (2011). Geminates. In van OostendorpM.EwenC. J.HumeE.RiceK. (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, volume 2 (pp. 837–859). Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
DelattreP. C.LibermanA. M.CooperF. S. (1955). Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. JASA, 27, 769–773.
26.
DmitrievaO. (2017). Production of geminate consonants in Russian: Implications for typology. In KubozonoH. (Ed.) The Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
ErwinW. M. (1963). A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
28.
EspositoA. (2002). On vowel height and consonantal voicing effects: Data from Italian. Phonetica, 59(4), 197–231.
29.
EspositoA.Di BenedettoM. G. (1999). Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(4), 2051–2062.
30.
FlemmingE. (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In HayesB.KirchnerR.SteriadeD. (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 232–276). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FujimuraO.MacchiM.StreeterL. (1978). Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Speech, 21, 337–346.
32.
GhiniM. (1995). The coronal-velar relationship in Genovese Ligurian. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 55–72.
33.
GoedemansR. (1998). Weightless segments. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
34.
GordonM. (2002). A phonetically driven account of syllable weight. Language, 78(1), 51–80.
35.
GordonM. (2006). Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology. New York: Routledge.
36.
GrondinS. (1993). Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(3), 383–394.
37.
HansenB. (2012). The perceptibility of duration in the phonetics and phonology of contrastive consonant length. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
38.
HarrisonS. P. (1995). Marshallese. In TryonD. T. (Ed.), Comparative Austronesian Dictionary, Part 1, Fascicle 2 (pp. 895–903). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
39.
HawkinsJ. A.CutlerA. (1988). Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. In HawkinsJ. A. (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 280–317). Blackwell.
40.
HayesB. (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Published 1985. New York: Garland.
41.
HayesB. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 53–306.
42.
HumeE.JohnsonK. (2001). A model of the interplay of speech perception and phonology. In HumeE.JohnsonK. (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp. 251–277). Academic Press.
43.
HuraS. L.LindblomB.DiehlR. L. (1992). On the role of perception in shaping phonological assimilation rules. Language and Speech, 35, 59–72.
44.
HutchinsS.GosselinN.PeretzI. (2010). Identification of changes along a continuum of speech intonation is impaired in congenital amusia. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 236.
45.
IBM Corp. Released2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
46.
JaegerJ. (1978). Speech aerodynamics and phonological universals. Proceedings of BLS, 4, 311–329.
47.
KasatkinL. L.ChojM. C. (1999). Dolgota/kratkost’ Soglasnogo na Meste Sochetanij Dvuh Bukv v Sovremennom Russkom Literatunom Jazike. Moskva: Dialog-MGU. [Duration of the doubly-spelled consonants in the Contemporary Standard Russian].
48.
KatoH.TsuzakiM.SagisakaY. (1997). Acceptability for temporal modifications of consecutive segments in isolated words. JASA, 101, 2311–2322.
49.
KawaharaS. (2007). Sonorancy and geminacy. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 32, 145–186.
50.
KawaharaS.PangilinanM. (in press). Spectral continuity, amplitude changes, and perception of length contrasts. In KubozonoH. (Ed.) Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved on 08/27/2016 from http://user.keio.ac.jp/~kawahara/pdf/GC_KawaharaPangilinan_Revision.pdf
51.
KolesnikovN. P. (1995). Slovar’ Slov s Dvojnymi Soglasnymi. Izdatel’stvo Rostovskogo Universiteta, Rostov-na-Donu. [Dictionary of words with double consonants].
52.
KotzorS.MolineauxB. J.BanksE.LahiriA. (2016). “Fake” gemination in suffixed words and compounds in English and German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 356–367.
53.
KraehenmannA. (2001). Swiss German stops: Geminates all over the word. Phonology, 18, 109–145.
54.
KraehenmannA. (2011). Initial Geminates. In van OostendorpM.EwenC. J.HumeE.RiceK. (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (pp. 1124–1146). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
55.
LehisteI. (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(6B), 2018–2024.
56.
LibermanM.PrinceA. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.
57.
LiljencrantsJ.LindblomB. (1972). Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language, 48(4), 839–862.
58.
LindblomB. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In OhalaJ.JaegerJ. (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 13–44). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
59.
MackM. (1982). Voicing-dependent vowel duration in English and French: Monolingual and bilingual production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(1), 173–178.
MatthewsW. J.StewartN.WeardenJ. H. (2011). Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 37(1), 303.
McCarthyK. M.MahonM.RosenS.EvansB. G. (2014). Speech perception and production by sequential bilingual children: A longitudinal study of voice onset time acquisition. Child Development, 85(5), 1965–1980.
64.
MullerJ. (2001). The phonology and phonetics of word-initial geminates. PhD thesis, Ohio State University.
65.
OhalaJ. (1990). The phonetics and phonology aspect of assimilation. In KingstonJ.BeckmanM. (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 258–275). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66.
OllerD. K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1235–1247.
67.
PadgettJ. (2003). Systemic contrast and Catalan rhotics. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.
68.
PadgettJ.TabainM. (2005). Adaptive dispersion theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica, 62(1), 14–54.
69.
PajakB. (2010). Contextual constraints on geminates: The case of Polish. Proceedings of BLS, 35, 269–280.
70.
PajakB. (2013). Non-intervocalic geminates: Typology, acoustics, perceptibility. In CarrollL.KeffalaB.MichelD. (Eds.), San Diego Linguistics Papers 4 (pp. 2–27). San Diego, CA: UC San Diego.
PickettE. R.BlumsteinS. E.BurtonM. W. (1999). Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Italian. Phonetica, 56(3–4), 135–157.
73.
PickettJ. M.DeckerL. R. (1960). Time factors in perception of a double consonant. Language and Speech3, 11–17.
74.
PlourdeM.Meilleur-WellsG.GamacheP. L.DionneG.GrondinS. (2008). Relative sensitivity to filled vs. empty intervals depends on methods: Evidence from developmental data. Proceedings of Fechner Day, 24(1), 93–98.
75.
PodesvaR. (2000). Constraints on geminates in Buginese and Selayarese. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume19, 343–356.
76.
PodesvaR. (2002). Segmental constraints on geminates and their implication for typology. Talk presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.
77.
Psychology Software Tools Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com.
78.
PychaA. (2010). A test case for the phonetics-phonology interface: Gemination restrictions in Hungarian. Phonology, 27, 119–152.
79.
RammsayerT. H. (2010). Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1591–1600.
80.
RidouaneR. (2007). Gemination in Tashlhiyt Berber: An acoustic and articulatory study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37, 119–142.
81.
RingenC.VagoR. M. (2011). Geminates: Heavy or long? In CairnsC.RaimyE. (Eds.), Handbook of the syllable (pp.155–169). Leiden: Brill.
82.
RogersD.D’ArcangeliL. (2004). Italian. Journal of International Phonetic Association34, 117–121.
83.
SantiA.MikiA.HornyakS.EidseJ. (2005). The perception of empty and filled time intervals by rats. Behavioural Processes, 70(3), 247–263.
84.
SchwartzJ-L.BoeL-J.ValleeN.AbryC. (1997a). The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 255–286.
85.
SchwartzJ-L.BoeL-J.ValleeN.AbryC. (1997b). Major trends in vowel system inventories. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 233–253
86.
SeilerG. (2009). Sound change or analogy? Monosyllabic lengthening in German and some of its consequences. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics, 12, 229–272.
87.
SmithC. L. (1997). The devoicing of /z/ in American English: Effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 471–500.
88.
SpaeltiP. (1994) Weak edges and final geminates in Swiss German. In GonzalezM. (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 24 (pp. 573–588). Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
89.
SteriadeD. (1997). Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Ms., UCLA.
90.
SteriadeD. (2001). Directional asymmetries in place assimilation. In HumeE.JohnsonK. (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp. 219–250). New York, NY: Academic Press.
91.
TaylorM. (1985). Some patterns of geminate consonants. University of Chicago Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 120–129.
92.
ThurgoodG. (1993). Geminates: A cross-linguistic examination. In NevisJ. A.McMenamicG.ThurgoodG. (Eds.), Papers in Honor of Frederick H. Brengelman on the Occasion of the Twenty-fifth Anniversary of the Department of Linguistics, (CSU) Fresno (pp. 129–139). Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University Fresno.
93.
TimberlakeA. (2004). A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
TopintziN. (2008). On the existence of moraic onsets. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 147–184.
95.
TurkA. (1992). The American English flapping rule and the effect of stress on stop consonant duration. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 7, 103–133.
96.
TurkA.WhiteL. (1999). Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 171–206.
97.
TurkA. E.Shattuck-HufnagelS. (2000). Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 397–440.
98.
WeardenJ. H.NortonR.MartinS.Montford-BebbO. (2007). Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 716.
99.
WrightR. (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In HayesB.KirchnerR.SteriadeD. (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 34–57). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
