This article focuses on the prosody of heritage speakers of a minority variety of French, spoken in Frenchville, Pennsylvania, since the 1830s. Specifically, this case study focuses on three distinct supra-segmental phenomena: (i) penultimate prominence, (ii) focus via prominence in situ, and (iii) the prosody of left dislocation. Although all three phenomena appear to be convergent with the speakers’ dominant language, American English, I argue that penultimate prominence cannot be unambiguously attributed to English influence but may instead be an inheritance from the 19th-century source dialect for Frenchville. Prominence at the higher discourse levels, for the expression of information structure, can much more clearly be interpreted as contact induced. As is demonstrated here, these bilinguals use pitch accents and tonal contours for a variety of pragmatic and discursive functions in ways that are very similar to English but impossible in any attested variety of French. Despite the influence of the structure of the dominant language on the heritage language, these data cannot be easily interpreted as evidence of attrition since the usual syntactic means for the expression of information structure in French are still very much intact in this variety. This implies that contact-influenced prosodic innovations among heritage speakers may serve as additional communication resources for the expression of discourse-pragmatic distinctions rather than as mere replacement strategies.
Alvord, S.M. ( 2006). Spanish intonation in contact: The case of Miami Cuban bilinguals. Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
2.
Bendor-Samuel, J. ( 1971). Niger-Congo: Gur. In T. Sebeok & J. Berry (Eds.), Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 141-178). The Hague/ Paris: Mouton.
3.
Bolinger, D. ( 1978). Intonation across languages. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, Vl.2, Phonology (pp. 471-524). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Bullock , B.E., & Gerfen, C. (2004a). Frenchville French: A case study in phonological attrition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(3), 303-320.
4.
Bullock, B.E., & Gerfen, C. ( 2004b). Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety . Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 95-104.
5.
Bullock, B.E., & Gerfen, C. ( 2005). The preservation of schwa in the converging phonological system of Frenchville French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 8(2) 117-130.
6.
Bullock, B.E., Dalola, A., & Gerfen, C. ( 2006). Mapping the patterns of maintenance versus merger in bilingual phonology: The preservation of [a] vs. [u] in Frenchville French . In J.-P. Montreuil (Ed.), New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics (pp. 15-30). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins .
7.
Bullock, B.E., & Toribio, A.J. ( 2006). Intra-system variability and change in nominal and verbal morphology. In D. Arteaga & R. Gess (Eds.), Historical Romance Linguistics: Retrospectives and Perspectives (pp. 305-326). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
8.
Burridge, K. ( 2007). Language contact and convergence in Pennsylvania German . In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 179-200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Campbell, N., & Beckman, M. ( 1997). Stress, prominence and spectral tilt. In A. Botinis, G. Kouroupeltroglou & G. Carayiannis (Eds.), Intonation: Theory, models and applications (pp. 67-70). Athens , Greece: University of Athens Department of Informatics .
10.
Carton, F., Espesser, R., & Vaissière, J. (1991). Étude sur la perception de l’accent régional du Nord et de l’Est de la France. In XII Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques, Aix-en-Provence , 4, 422-425.
11.
Cichocki, W., & Lepetit, D. ( 1986). Intonational variability in language contact: F0 declination in Ontario French. In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Diversity and diachrony (pp. 239-247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12.
Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J. ( 2004). Convergence and intonation: historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 7(2), 107-119.
13.
Delais-Roussarie, E., Doetjes, J., & Sleeman, P. ( 2004). Dislocation. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), The Handbook of French Semantics (pp. 477-500). Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.
14.
Delattre, P. ( 1962). Comparing the prosodic features of English, German, Spanish and French. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 1, 193-210.
15.
De Jong, K. ( 2004). Pitch accent and boundary tone examples for your listening pleasure. Copyright 2004-2005. Last update 27 March 2004. URL (retrieved August 2008): http://www.indiana.edu/~phonlab/intonation_ex.htm
16.
Di Cristo, A. ( 1998). Intonation in French. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation Systems: A Survey of twenty languages (pp. 195-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Doetjes, J., Delais-Roussarie, E., & Sleeman, P. ( 2002). The prosody of left detached constituents in French . Speech Prosody2002, 245-250.
18.
Doetjes, J., Rebuschi, G., & Rialland, A. ( 2004). Cleft sentences. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), The Handbook of French Semantics (pp. 529-552). Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.
19.
Dondaine, C. ( 1977). Réflexions sur le français régional d’un village haut-saônais. Travaux de linguistique de de littérature, 15(1), 51-63.
20.
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp , S. (2007). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish . Cognition, 106(2), 682-706.
21.
Elordieta, G. ( 2003). The Spanish intonation of speakers of a Basque pitch-accent dialect. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 67-95.
22.
Epps, P. ( 2007). The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 267-289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Fagyal, Z. ( 2005). Prosodic consequences of being a beur: French in contact with immigrant languages in Paris. Selected Papers from NWAV 32, Working Papers in Linguistics, 10(2), 91-104. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
24.
Féry, C. ( 2001). Focus and Phrasing in French. In C. Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (Eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Armin von Stechow (pp153-81). Berlin : Akademie Verlag.
25.
Godson, L. ( 2004) Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 2, 1-22.
26.
González, G. ( 1988). Chicano English. In D. J. Bixler-Marquez & J. Ornstein Galicia (Eds.), Chicano speech in the bilingual classroom (pp. 72-81). New York: Peter Lang.
27.
Gregory, M.L., & Michaelis, L.A. (2001). Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1665-1706.
28.
Hirst, D., & DI Cristo, A. ( 1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of twenty languages . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Huffines, M.L. ( 1986). Intonation in language contact: Pennsylvania German and English. In W. Enninger, Studies on the languages and verbal behaviour of the Pennsylvania Germans (pp. 25-36). Stuttgard: Steiner Verlag.
30.
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C. ( 2002). Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation . Probus, 14(1), 147-172.
31.
Ladd, R. ( 1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Lambrecht, K. ( 1997). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Lléo, C., Rakow, M., & Kehoe, M. ( 2004). Acquisition of language-specific pitch accent by Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual children. Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology (pp. 3-27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34.
Mackey, W.F. ( 2000). The description of bilingualism. In L. Wei (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 22-50). London: Routledge.
35.
Matisoff, J.A. ( 1973). Tonogenesis in South-East Asia. In L. Hyman (Ed.), Consonant types and tone (pp. 71-96). Los Angeles: University of Southern California .
36.
Mennen, I. ( 2004). Bidirectional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543-563.
37.
Miller, J.S. ( 2007). Swiss French prosody: Intonation, rate, and speaking style in the Vaud canton. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
38.
Montrul, S. ( 2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125-142.
39.
Montrul, S. ( 2006). On the bilingual competence of Spanish heritage speakers: Syntax, lexical semantics and processing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(1), 37-69.
40.
Mougeon, F., & Uritescu, D. ( 2006). Évolution intrasystémique et restriction linguistique dans l’usage du français des habitants de Frenchville, Pennsylvanie. La Linguistique, 42(1), 115-128.
41.
O’Rourke, E. ( 2003). Peak alignment in two regional varieties of Peruvian Spanish intonation. In J. Auger, J. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics (pp. 321-341). Amsterdam: Benjamins .
42.
Ortega-Llebaría, M., Prieto, P., & Vanrell, M. Del Mar (2007). Perceptual evidence for direct acoustic correlates of stress in Spanish. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1121-1124 . URL (retrieved July 2009): http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1604/1604.pdf
43.
Post, B. ( 2000). Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation . The Hague: Thesus.
44.
Prince, E. ( 1979). On the given/new distinction. Chicago Linguistic Society, 15, 267-278.
45.
Prince, E. ( 1984). Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional analysis . Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 433, 213-225.
46.
Pustka, E., & Vordermayer, M. (2007). Le français parlé en Haute-Savoie et les corrélats prosodiques d’un accent perçu comme «traînant». Bulletin Phonologie du français contemporain, 7, 273-282.
47.
Queen, R.M. ( 2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish- German bilingual children. Language in Society , 30, 55-80.
48.
Roggia, A., & Bullock, B.E. ( 2007). Focus strategies in Spanish-English bilinguals . Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium on Bilingualism , Hamburg, Germany.
49.
Salmons, J. ( 1992). Accentual change and language contact: Comparative survey and a case study of Early Northern Europe. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
50.
Sankoff, G. ( 2001). Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill , & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 638-668). Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Simon, A.C. ( 2003). La variation prosodique régionale en français dans les données conversationnelles: proposition théortiques et méthodologiques. Bulletin Phonologie du français contemporain, 3, 99-113.
52.
Simonet, M. ( 2008). Language contact in Majorca: An experimental sociophonetic approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign.
53.
Sluijter, A.M.C., & van Heuven, V.J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4), 2471-2485.
54.
Sorace, A. ( 2004). Native language attrition and instability at the syntax discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 7(2), 143-145.
55.
Thibault, L., & Ouellet, M. ( 1996). Tonal distinctions between emphatic stress and pretonic lengthening in Quebec French. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language, 638-641.
56.
Thomason, S.J., & Kauffman, T. ( 1988). Language Contact, creolization and genetic linguistics . Los Angeles: University of California Press.
57.
Urban, G., & Sherzer, J. ( 1988). The linguistic anthropology of native South America . Annual Review of Anthropology, 17, 283-307.
58.
Vaissière, J. ( 2001). Phonetic and prosodic changes: From Latin to French . Revue Parole, 17-19, 53-87.
59.
Vaissière, J. ( 2002). Cross-linguistic prosodic description: French versus English. In L. V. Bondarko, N. B. Volslkaya, N. D. Svetozarova , & P. A. Skrelin (Eds.), Problems and methods in experimental phonetics (pp. 147-164). St Petersburg: St Petersburg State University.
60.
Vaissière, J. ( 2005). Perception of intonation. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 236-263). Oxford: Blackwell.
61.
Valdman, A. ( 1979). Créolisation, français populaire et le parler des isolats francophones d’Amérique du Nord. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Le français hors de France (pp. 181-197). Paris: Champion .
62.
Valdman, A., Auger, J., & Piston-Hatlen, D. (2005). Le français en Amérique du Nord; État présent. Québec : Presses de l’Université Laval.
63.
Weinreich, U. ( 1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York: Publications of theLinguistic Society of New York, no. 1.
64.
Welby, P. ( 2006). French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment . Journal of Phonetics, 34, 343-371.
65.
Winford, D. ( 2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
