We take a radical approach to the organizing principles of emergent grammars in bilingual children: (1) We adopt the framework of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft, 2001) and (2) we undertake an extensive analysis of a wide range of utterances, covering the first six months of word combinations in two children. We address two questions: (1) Do predicates fail to match the language context more often than arguments? (2) What is the nature of the mixed child predicates, and does it change over time? We find that (1) for both children predicates do fail to match the language context more often and (2) both children move from the use of non-verbs as predicates in the first months to adult-like use of verb predicates later. A third question arises from our findings: Why should bilingual children treat predicates differently from arguments in early word combination? We attribute this to the learning process itself and to a difference in accessibility established in adult studies for concrete or imageable as compared with abstract words. The arguments used in the first word combinations, derived directly from experience with objects and persons, are readily imageable, while early predicates have to be learned through a process of abstraction.
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage based models of language . Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
2.
Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Verbs and nouns: The importance of being imageable . Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 113-149.
3.
Bloom, L. (1973) One word at a time. The Hague : Mouton.
4.
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cann, R. (2000). Functional versus lexical: a cognitive dichotomy . In R. Borsley (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 32: The nature and function of syntactic categories (pp.37-78). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Deuchar, M. (1999). Are function words non-language-specific in early bilingual two-word utterances? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 23-34.
8.
Deuchar, M., & Muntz, R. (2003). Factors accounting for code-mixing in an early developing bilingual. In N. Müller (Ed.), (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism (pp.161-190). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9.
Deuchar, M., & Quay, S. (1999). Language choice in the earliest utterances: a case study with methodological implications. Journal of Child Language, 26, 461-475.
10.
Deuchar, M., & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
11.
Deuchar, M., & Vihman, M. (2002). Language contact in early bilinguals. The special status of function words. In M. C. Jones & E. Esch (Eds.), Contact-induced language change: An examination of internal, external and non-linguistic factors (pp.267-281). The Hague: Mouton.
12.
Ellis, N.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
13.
Ferguson, C.A. (1978). Learning to pronounce: The earliest stages of phonological development in the child. In F. D. Minifie & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Communicative and cognitive abilities-early behavioral assessment (pp.273-297). Baltimore: University Park Press.
14.
Gathercole, V.M., Sebastián, E., & Soto, P. (1999). The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 133-182.
15.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Hudson, R. (2000). Grammar without functional categories. In R. Borsley (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 32: The nature and function of syntactic categories (pp.7-35). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Köppe, R. (1996). Language differentiation in bilingual children: the development of grammatical and pragmatic competence. Linguistics, 34, 927-954.
18.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Volume 1). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22.
McCune, L. (in press). Dynamic event words: From common cognition to varied linguistic expression. First Language.
23.
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1981). The cognitive bases of early relational words . Journal of Child Language, 8, 15-36.
24.
Meisel, J. (1994). Code-switching in young bilingual children. The acquisition of grammatical constraints. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 413-439.
25.
Meisel, J. (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In J. Cenoz & F. Genesee , (Eds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition (pp. 11-41). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins ,.
26.
Muysken, R. (2000). Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status . Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
28.
Quirk,, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language . London: Longman.
29.
Scollon, R. (1976). Conversations with a one year old. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
30.
Swaab, T.Y., Baynes, K., & Knight, R.T. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research , 15, 99-103.
31.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence ? Cognition, 74, 204 - 253.
33.
Tomasello, M., & Merriman, W.E. (1995). Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs. Hillsdale, N.J. : Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
Vihman, M.M. (1978). Consonant harmony: Its scope and function in child language. In J. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language, 2 (pp. 281-334). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
35.
Vihman, M.M. (1982). The acquisition of morphology by a bilingual child: A whole-word approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 141-160.
36.
Vihman, M.M. (1985). Language differentiation by the bilingual infant . Journal of Child Language, 12, 297-324.
37.
Vihman, M.M. (1998). A developmental perspective on code-switching: Conversations between a pair of bilingual siblings. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2, 45-84.
38.
Vihman, M.M. (1999). The transition to grammar in a bilingual child: Positional patterns, model learning and relational words. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 267-301.
39.
Vihman, M.M., & McCune, L. (1994). When is a word a word? Journal of Child Language, 21, 517-542.
40.
West, W.C., & Holcomb, P.J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1024-1037.
