One of the most interesting features of language contact situations involves the appearance of systematic patterns that are not manifested in either of the two languages in contact. A full analysis of such patterns may require constraint rankings that differ from those of both the native and the target languages. I examine possible sources of these constraint rankings with respect to the devoicing of final obstruents in learners whose native language contains either no final consonants or no final obstruents, and whose target language contains both voiced and voiceless final obstruents. I conclude that the interlanguage ranking follows from the frequency of different input structures, given the assumption that constraint rankings are stochastic (Boersma & Hayes, 2001), and that final devoicing is an effect of positional markedness constraints. I then consider possible alternative explanations of interlanguage final devoicing: as a reflection of native language rankings of positional faithfulness constraints; as an effect of perceptual filtering; and/or as a function of articulatory difficulty of sustaining voicing in final position.
Broselow, E. (1988). Prosodic phonology and the acquisition of a second language. In S. Flynn & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 295-308). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5.
Broselow, E. (1999). Stress, epenthesis, and segment transformation in Selayarese loans. In S. Chang, L. Liaw & J. Ruppenhofer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 211-225). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
6.
Broselow, E., Chen, S., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261-280.
7.
Clark, E., & Bowerman, M. (1986). On the acquisition of final voiced stops. In The Fergusonian Impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson, Volume I (From phonology to society) (pp. 51-68). Berlin/ New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
8.
Davidson, L., Jusczyk, P., & Smolensky, P. (2000). The initial and final states: Theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA428-1280.
9.
Eckman, F. (1981). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31,195-216.
10.
Flege, J., & Davidian, R. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics , 5, 323-347.
11.
Flege, J., McCutcheon, J., & Smith, S. (1987). The development of skill in producing word final English stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 82, 433 -447.
12.
Gafos, A. (2003). Dynamics: The nonderivational alternative to modeling phonetics-phonology. Manuscript, New York University.
13.
Gnanadesikan, A. (1995). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-67.
14.
Grijzenhout, J., & Van Rooy, B. (2000). Second language phonology: Acquisition through gradual constraint demotion. Manuscript, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf and Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir CHO, South Africa.
15.
Hayes, B. (1999). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: The early stages. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-327.
16.
Heyer, S. (1986). English final consonants and the Chinese learner . Unpublished M.A. thesis, Southern Illinois University , Edwardsville IL, U.S.A.
17.
Levelt, C., & Van de Vijver, V. (1998). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA265.
18.
Lombardi, L. (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory , 17, 267-302.
19.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Unpublished manuscript. Rutgers University.
20.
Prince, A., & Tesar, B. (1999). Learning phonotactic distributions. Unpublished manuscript. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-353.
21.
Pulleyblank, D., & Turkel, W.J. (2000). Learning phonology: Genetic algorithms and Yoruba tongue-root harmony. In J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition (pp. 554 - 592). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Ross, K. (1996). Floating phonotactics: Variability in infixation and reduplication of Tagalog words. Unpublished M.A. thesis, UCLA.
23.
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
24.
Silverman, D. (1992). Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology, 9, 289-328.
25.
Smith, N. (1973). Acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press .
26.
Stemberger, J. (1996). Syllable structure in English, with emphasis on codas. In B. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert, & D. Ingram (Eds.), Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition (pp. 62-76). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
27.
Steriade, D. (1999). Alternatives to syllable-based accounts of consonantal phonotactics. In O. Fujimura, B. D. Joseph, & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Linguistics and Phonetics Conference (pp. 205-242). Prague: The Karolinum Press.
28.
Steriade, D. (2000). The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Unpublished ms., UCLA.
29.
Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 229-268.
30.
Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Vogel, I. (1991). Prosodic phonology: Second language acquisition data as evidence in theoretical phonology. In T. Huebner & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 47-65). Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company.
32.
Wang, C. (1995). The acquisition of English word-final obstruents by Chinese speakers. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
33.
Wissing, D., & Zonneveld, W. (1996). Final devoicing as a robust phenomenon in second language acquisition: Tswana, English and Afrikaans. South African Journal of Linguistics, Supplement, 34, 3-24.
34.
Yavas, M. (1994). Final stop devoicing in interlanguage. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp.267-282). San Diego, CA: Singular.
35.
Yip, M. ( 1993). Cantonese loan word phonology and Optimality Theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, 261-291.
36.
Xu, Zh. (2003). A GLA account of variation in the interlanguage phonology of Mandarin learners of English. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
37.
Zoll, C. (1998). Positional asymmetries and licensing. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-282.
