In this paper I investigate the assignation of syllabic structure to segments in second language learners invoking principles of parsing and learnability. Drawing on the model of Phillips (1996) in parsing, and the work of Fodor (1999) and Dresher (1999) in learnability, I discuss the implications for second language learning. I also look at the question of whether new phonological structure can be triggered if that structure is lacking in the first language. Drawing on evidence from the acquisition of (1) phonological features in Japanese, Chinese and French learners of English, as well as English learners of Czech, and (2) moraic structure by an English speaker learning Japanese consonant and vowel length contrasts, I argue that second language learners can trigger new prosodic structure. The process of acquisition is a combination of acquiring new structures, and mapping the interfaces of different levels of structure via a phonological parser.
Atkey, S. (2000). The acquisition of non-native segmental contrasts: A look at English speakers' acquisition of Czech palatal stops. In A. James & J. Leather (Eds.), Proceedings of the New Sounds 2000 Conference (pp. 22-31). University of Klagenfurt Press.
2.
Avery, P., & Idsardi, W. (2000). On the laryngeal specification of tone. Paper presented at the MOT Phonology Workshop, Toronto.
3.
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & Van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica , 54, 298-308.
4.
Broselow, E. (1988). Prosodic phonology and the acquisition of a second language. In. S. Flynn & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 295-308). Kluwer.
5.
Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 4-63). Blackwell.
6.
Carroll, S. (1999). Putting "input" in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337 - 388.
7.
Curtin, S. (1999). Positional prominence in the acquisition of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association (pp. 89 - 100). Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa.
8.
Curtin, S., Goad, H., & Pater, J. (1998). Phonological transfer and levels of representation: The perceptual acquisition of Thai voice and aspiration by English and French speakers. Second Language Research, 14, 389-405.
9.
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dupoux, E., & Gout, A. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12,635-647.
10.
Dekydtspotter, L. (2001). The universal parser and interlanguage: Domain-specific mental organization in the comprehension of combien interrogatives in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research, 17, 91-143.
11.
Dresher, E. (1999). Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 27-67.
12.
Dresher, E., & Van Der Hulst, H. (1995). Global determinacy and learnability in phonology. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 1-22). Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Flege, J. (1992). Speech learning in a second language. In C. Ferguson, L. Menn & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development (pp. 565-604). York Press .
14.
Fodor, J. (1999). Learnability theory: Triggers for parsing with . In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 363 -406). John Benjamins.
15.
Gibson, E., & Wexler, K. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 407-454.
16.
Han, M. ( 1992). The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for non-native speakers. Phonetica , 49, 102-127.
17.
Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253 - 306.
18.
Jusczyk, P. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. MIT Press.
19.
Kaye, J. (1991 /92). Do you believe in Magic? The story of S +C sequences. In SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics , University of London.
20.
Lacharité, D., & Prévost, P. (1999). The role of L1 and of teaching in the acquisition of English sounds by francophones. In A. Greenhill , H. Littlefield & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 23 (pp. 373-385). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
21.
Mah, J., & Archibald, J. (2003). The acquisition of L2 length contrasts. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA 2002) , (pp. 208-212). Cascadilla Press.
22.
Matthews, J. (1997). The influence of pronunciation training on the perception of second language contrasts. In J. Leather & A. James (Eds.), New Sounds 97 (pp. 223-239). University of Klagenfurt Press.
23.
Phillips, C. (1996). Order and structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, M.I.T.
24.
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
25.
Singleton, D. (1989). Language acquisition: The age factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters47.
26.
Young-Scholten, M. (1994). On positive evidence and ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 193-214.
27.
White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition . Benjamins.
28.
Zec, D. ( 1995). Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology, 12, 85-130.
