Loftus and Palmer's(1974) ingenious experiments convincingly demonstrated that linguistic changes in the verbal framing of questions result in changes in eyewitness testimonies. Their findings have inspired a new line of research investigating the relationship between language and eyewitness memory. The present study expands the focus of inquiry to bilingual individuals and examines ways in which cross-linguistic differences—and second language learning in adulthood—may influence the participants' performance on memory tasks involving visual recall. The results demonstrate that in instances where availability—or lack—of certain lexically encoded concepts led to differences in narratives elicited from monolingual speakers of Russian and American English, there were also differences between the two bilingual groups. Russians who learned English as a foreign language patterned with monolingual Russians in their recall, while Russians who learned English as a second language used additional interpretive frames, privacy and personal space, available in English but not in Russian. The discussion examines these results from the perspective of discursive relativity, suggesting directions for further study of the relationship between bilingualism, memory, and cognition.
Arnold, P., & Mills, M. (2001). Memory for faces, shoes, and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(2), 185-195.
2.
Berk-Seligson, S. (1990). The bilingual courtroom: Courtin terpreters in the judicial process. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
Bowerman, M., & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University ress.
5.
Chafe, W. (Ed.). (1980). The Pear Stories. Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production . Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
6.
Chafe, W. (1998). Things we can learn from repeated tellings of the same experience. Narrative Inquiry, 8(2), 269-285.
7.
Clair, R. (1993). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs , 60, 113-136.
8.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Pavlenko, A. (2002). Emotion vocabulary in interlanguage. Language Learning, 52(2), 265-324.
9.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Pavlenko, A. (2003). Productivity and lexical richness in native and non-native speech: A study of cross-cultural effects. In V.Cook(Ed.), L2 influence on L1 (pp. 120-141). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
10.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
11.
Fillmore CH (1977). Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole(Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 76-138). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University ress.
12.
Fiske, S., & Linville, P. (1980). What does the schema concept buy us?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 543 - 557.
13.
Gewirtz, P. (1996). Narrative and rhetoric in the law. In P.Brooks & P.Gewirtz (Eds.), Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law (pp. 2 - 13). New Haven, CT: Yale University ress.
14.
Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University ress.
15.
Holmes, J. (1997). Struggling beyond Labov and Waletzky. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 91-96.
16.
Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98(3), 377-389.
17.
Jarvis, S. (1994). L1 influence on interlanguage lexical reference. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington, U.S.
18.
Jarvis, S. (1998). Conceptual transfer in the interlingual lexicon . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications.
19.
Jarvis, S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50(2), 245-309.
20.
Javier, R., Barroso, F., & Muñoz, M. (1993). Autobiographical memory in bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(3), 319-338.
21.
Koven, M. (1998). Two languages in the self/the self in two languages: French-Portuguese bilinguals' verbal enactments and experiences of self in narrative discourse. Ethos, 26(4), 410-455.
22.
Koven, M. (2001). Comparing bilinguals' quoted performances of self and others in tellings of the same experience in two languages. Language in Society, 30(4), 513-558.
23.
Koven, M. (in press). Getting "emotional" in two languages: Bilinguals' semiotic resources for the verbal performance of affect. Text.
24.
Levinson, S. (1997). From outer to inner space: Categories and nonlinguistic thinking. In J. Nuyts & E.Pederson(Eds.), Language and conceptualization (pp.13-45). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning. Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Loftus, E., & Almer, J. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
28.
Lucy, J. (1992a). Language diversity and thought. A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Lucy, J. (1992b). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge , U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Lucy, J. (1996). The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In J.Gumperz & S.Levinson(Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.37-69). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Lucy, J. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291-312.
32.
McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. (2003). Patterns of narrative discourse: A multicultural, life span approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
Mistry, J. (1993). Cultural context in the development of children's narratives. In J.Altarriba (Ed), Cognition and culture: A cross-cultural approach to psychology (pp. 207-228). Elsevier Science Publishers.
34.
NEW ENGLISH-RUSSIAN DICTIONARY(1979). Moscow : Russian Language.
35.
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2000). Evidence for linguistic relativity. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
36.
Nuyts, J., & Pederson, E. (Eds.). (1997). Language and conceptualization . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Universit Press.
37.
OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY(1984). Second ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Pavlenko, A. (1997). Bilingualism and cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
39.
Pavlenko, A. (1999). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory . Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 209-230.
40.
Pavlenko, A. (2000). What's in a concept?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 31-36.
41.
Pavlenko, A. (2002a). Emotions and the body in Russian and English . Pragmatics and Cognition, 10(1-2), 201-236.
42.
Pavlenko, A. (2002b). Bilingualism and emotions. Multilingua , 21(1), 45-78.
43.
Pavlenko, A. (in press). Bilingualism and thought. In A.de Groot & J.Kroll(Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Pavlenko, A., & Jarvis, S. (2002). Bidirectional transfer. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 190-214.
45.
Pederson, E. (1995). Language as context, language as means: Spatial cognition and habitual language use. Cognitive Linguistics , 6(1), 33-62.
46.
Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S., & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization . Language, 74(3), 557-589.
47.
Polanyi, L. (1995). Language learning and living abroad: Stories from the field. In B.Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp.271-291) Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins .
48.
Putz, M., & Verspoor, M. (2000). Explorations in linguistic relativity. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
49.
Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.Spiro, B. Bruce & W. Brewer(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp.33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50.
Sapir, E. (1949). Selected writings of Edward Sapir. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51.
Schrauf, R.W. (2000). Bilingual autobiographical memory: Experimental studies and clinical cases. Culture and Psychology, 6(4), 387-417.
52.
Shaw, J., Garcia, L., & Robles, B. (1997). Cross-language post event misinformation effects in Spanish-English bilingual witnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 889-899.
53.
Sherzer, J. (1987). A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 295-309.
54.
Slobin, D. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S.Niemeier & R.Dirven(Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp.107-137). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
55.
Slobin, D. (2001). Form-function relations: How do children find out what they are? In M. Bowerman & S.Levinson(Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 406-449). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Tannen, D. (1980). A comparative analysis of oral narrative strategies: Greek and American English. In W.Chafe (Ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 51-87). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57.
Tannen, D. (1982). Spoken and written narrative in English and Greek . In D.Tannen(Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 21-41). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
58.
Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
Thompson, Ch., Herrmann, D., Read, D., Bruce, D., Payne, D., & Toglia, M. (1998). Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
60.
Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings ofBenjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
62.
Wood, J. (1994). Gendered Lives. Communicaton, gender, and culture . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
