The focus of this article is the supposed “Gender Paradox,” proposed by Labov(1990,2001), which suggests that women are both sometimes conservative and sometimes innovative in terms of linguistic variation and change. Here we explore the paradox from two perspectives: we in vestigate both its applicability to multilingual as opposed to multidialectal communities as well as question whether the paradox is methodological or real. Although much sociolinguistic research on the paradox has been on macro studies of men versus women in monolingual multidialectal communities, this paper presents quantitative analyses supplemented by in-depth ethnographic observation and data collection in a multilingual Japanese-Palauan community of the Western Pacific. What is more, and perhaps somewhat surprisingly, the “conservatism” and “innovation” of women in the community under scrutiny is represented by the use of the very same language—Japanese. For older Japanese-Palauan women, the greater use of Japanese represents adherence to their heritage language. Among younger Japanese-Palauan women(most of whom are bilingual in Palauan and English), however, the use of Japanese represents a change to wards a language highly valued in the economy as essential for the promotion of tourism and trade. Since our results demonstrate that the effects of gender on language behavior may appear in differences within sex groupings, we conclude that the paradox is methodological, rather than real, and is a result of the distillling of gender down to binary male-female categories of analysis, rather than investigating the complexity of gender more qualitatively. Our ethnographic analysis of multilingual data from Palau presented here demonstrates that function as well as form are important in understanding seemingly paradoxical examples of language shift, as well as highlighting the need both for further research on the effects of gender in multilingual communities and the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis in studies of language change.
Aipolo, A., & Holmes, J. (1990). The use of Tongan in New Zealand, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 11(6),501-521.
2.
Bartha, C. (2000). Language ideologies, linguistic and social practices and patterns of language shift: Hungarian immigrant communities on the United States. Paper presented at 13th U.K. Sociolinguistics Symposium, University of West England, April 2000.
3.
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204.
4.
Ben Tah Ila, A., & Davies, E.E. (1992). Codeswitching and language dominance. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals(pp.443-458). Elsevier: Amsterdam .
5.
Bentahila, A., & Davies, E.E. (1995). Patterns of codeswitching and patterns of language contact. Lingua, 96, 75-93.
6.
Cheshire, J. (2001). Sex and gender in variationist research. In J.Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes(Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change(pp.423-443). Oxford: Bla ckwell.
7.
Cheshire, J., & Gardner-Chloros, P. (1998). Codeswitching and the sociolinguistic gender pattern. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 129,5-34.
8.
Clyne, M. (1982). Multilingual Australia. Melbourne : River Seine.
9.
Clyne, M. (1991). Community languages: The Australian experience . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Eckert, P. (1990). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change, 1, 245-267.
11.
Eckert, P. (2000). Language variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1999). New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research, Language in Society, 28(2), 185-201.
13.
Fishman, J.A. (1966). Language loyalty in the United States. TheHague: Mouton.
14.
Fishman, J.A. (1984). Mother-tongue claiming in the United States since 1960: Trends and correlates. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 21-99.
15.
Fishman, J.A. (1991).Reversing language shift. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.
16.
Gal, S. ( 1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.
17.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1995). Codeswitching in community, regional and national repertoires: The myth of the discreteness of linguistic systems. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching (pp.68-89). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1997). Codeswitching: Language selection in three Strasbourg department stores. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski(Eds.), Sociolinguists: A reader and coursebook (pp.361-375). London: Macmillan Press.
19.
Gold Stein, T. (1992). Language choice and women learners of ESL. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz & B. Moonwomon(Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the 1992 Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 171 - 181). Berkeley: Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.
20.
Holmes, J.A. (1993). Women's role in language maintenance and shift . Working Papers in Language Gender and Sexism, 3, 5-24.
21.
Holmes, J.A. (1996). Sex and language. In H. Goebl, P. Nelde, Z. Stary & W. Wölck(Eds.), Contact linguistics: An international handbook of contemporary research(pp.720-725). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
22.
Holmes, J. A., & Harlow, R. (Eds.). (1991). Threads in the New Zealand tapestry of language. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.
23.
Holmes, J.A., & Meyerhoff, M. (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Bla ckwell.
24.
Horvath, B. (1985). Variation in Australian English. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Johnston, R. (1972). Future Australians. Canberra : ANU Press.
26.
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York city. Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
27.
Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology, Language in Society, 1, 97-120.
28.
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change , 2, 205-254.
29.
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
Li Wei( 1994). Three generations, two languages, one family. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
31.
Lippi-Green, R. (1989). Social network integration and language contact in progress in a rural alpine village. Language in Society , 18, 213-234.
32.
Lipps Group(2000). Special issue: LIDES coding manual: A document for preparing and analyzing language interaction data. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(2), 1-150.
33.
Matsumoto, K. (1999). The politics of language choice amongst Palauan, English and Japanese: Symbolic domination in the Republic of Palau, Micronesia . In International Association of World Englishes (Ed.), World Englishes and Asian identities: IAWE-VI at Tsukuba, Japan. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on World Englishes 27-30 July, 1999 (pp.91-95). Nagoya : IAWE-Japan.
34.
Matsumoto, K. (2001a). Language contact and change in Micronesia: Evidence from the multilingual Republic of Palau. UnpublishedPh.D. Thesis. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.
35.
Matsumoto, K. (2001b). Multilingualism in Palau: Language contact with Japanese and English. In T. E. M cAuley (Ed.), Language change in East Asia (pp. 87-142). London : Curzon Press.
36.
Matsumoto, K. (2001c). A social network study of language shift and maintenance in a trilingual Micronesian society, Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics, 3, 105-132.
37.
Matsumoto, K., & Britain, D. (2000). Hegemonic diglossia and pickled radish: Symbolic domination and resistance in the trilingual Republic of Palau. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 29, 1-37.
38.
Matsumoto, K., & Britain, D. (2003). Language choice and cultural hegemony in the Western Pacific: Linguistic symbols of domination and resistance in the Republic of Palau. In M. Dedaic & D. N. Nelson(Eds.), At war with words . New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
39.
Medicine, B. (1987). The role of American Indian women in cultural continuity and transition. In J.Penfield(Ed .), Women and language in transition(pp.159-166). Albany: State University of New York Press.
40.
Milroy, L. (1987).Language and social networks. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Mohan, P., & Zador, P. (1986). Discontinuity in a life-cycle: The death of Trinidad Bhojpuri. Language, 62(2), 291-319.
Nichols, P. (1979). Black women in the rural south: Conservative and innovative. In B. L. Dubois & I.Crouch(Eds.), Papers in Southwest English IV: Proceedings of the Conference on the Sociology of the Languages of American Women (pp.103-114). San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University.
44.
Nichols, P. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural south. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley , (Eds.), Language, gender and society(pp.54-68). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
45.
Office Of Planning And Statistics(1997). 1995 Census of Population and Housing: Palau. Koror, Palau.
46.
Papazach Ariou, D. (1998). Linguistic variation and the social construction of identity: The Sociolinguistic Role of Intonation among adolescents in Northern Greece. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.
47.
Reynolds, M., & Akram, M. (1999). Punjabi-Urdu in Sheffield: Language shift and the development of a mixed code. Paper presented at 2nd International Symposium on Bilingualism, University of Newcastle, April, 1999.
48.
Roberts, M. (1991). The New Zealand Chinese community of Wellington: Aspects of language maintenance and shift. In J.Holmes & R.Harlow(Eds.), Threads in the New Zealand tapestry of language(pp.31-70). Auckland : Linguistic Society of New Zealand.
49.
Saville-Troike, M.( 1989). The ethnography of communication. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
50.
Troy, J. (1987). The role of Aboriginal women in the development of contact languages in New South Wales: From the late 18th to the early 20th century. In A. Pauwels(Ed.), Women and language in Australian and New Zealand Society(pp.155-169). Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.
51.
Verivaki, M.( 1991). Greek language maintenance and shift in the Greek community of Wellington. In J.Holmes & R.Harlow(Eds.), Threads in the New Zealand tapestry of language(pp.71-116). Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.
52.
Williams, C. H. (Ed.). (1988). Language in geographic context. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
