In this article we present an analysis of the relationship between L3 reading comprehension and its constituent skills for bilingual Dutch students for whom English is a third language(L3) compared to monolingual Dutch students for whom English is a second language(L2). An analogous analysis is made for their Dutch reading comprehension, Dutch being their L2 and L1 respectively. Participants are 13/14 year-old secondary school students. The point of departure in the analyses is a regression model in which reading proficiency is decomposed into three types of constituent components: linguistic knowledge(vocabulary and grammar), speed of processing linguistic knowledge(lexical access and sentence comprehension), and metacognitive knowledge(of text characteristics and strategies for reading and writing). Using structural equation modeling, we determined the contribution of constituent skills to Dutch L2 and L1, and English L3 and L2 reading comprehension. The results showed that, despite differences between the two groups in Dutch and English reading comprehension, no differences between the groups were found in the pattern of regression weights on the three types of constituent skills. Possible implications of these findings are discussed.
Acock, A.C. (1997). Working with missing values. Family Science Review, 10, 76-102.
2.
Alderson, J.C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart(Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp.1-24). London: Longman.
3.
Appel, R., & Vermeer, A. (1998). Speeding up second language vocabulary acquisition of minority children. Language and Education, 12, 159-173.
4.
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson(Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp.353-394). New York: Longman.
5.
Bruno, G.I. (2001). Metacognitive reading awareness of trilingual readers in Barcelona. In J.Cenoz, B. Hufeisen & U. Jessner (Eds.), Looking beyond second language acquisition: Studies in tri-and multilingualism(pp.137-151). Tubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
6.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
7.
Corder, S.P. (1979). Language distance and the magnitude of the learning task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 27-36.
8.
Edelenbos, P., Pijl, Y.J., & Vinjé, M.P. (1993). Verschillen in het beheersing sniveauvan het Engels tussen Nederlandse en allochtone leerlingen. [Differences between Dutch and immigrant students in mastery of English language]Groningen : RION.
9.
Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring; A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist , 34, 906-911.
10.
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
11.
Hacquebord, H.I.( 1989). Tekstbegrip van Turkse en Nederlandse leerlingen in het voortgezet onderwijs. [Text comprehension of Turkish and Dutch students in secondary education]Groningen: RUG.
12.
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J.H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145-163.
13.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc .
14.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS 2: User's Reference Guide. A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization; A preprocessor for LISREL . Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
15.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review , 99, 122-149.
16.
Koda, K.( 1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 450-460.
17.
Laberg E., D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
18.
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Perfetti, C.A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort(Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167-208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G.A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Ha ll.
22.
Sanders, M., & Meijers, G. (1995). English as L3 in the Elementary School. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 107-108, 59-78.
23.
Savage, L. (1994). Meertalige leerlingen en het leren van moderne vreemde talen. Hoe denken docenten erover?Levende Talen, issue486,13-17. [Multilingual students and learning modern foreign languages. What do teachers think of it? Living Languages].
24.
Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bosser S, B. (1998). Language-dependent and languageindependent knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension. An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48, 71-106.
25.
Schoonen, R., Van Gelderen, A., Glopper, K. , deHulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Steven Son, M. (2002). Linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and retrieval speed in L1, L2 and EFL writing. In S. Ransdell & M.-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing(pp.101-122). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
Sijtstra, J. (1997). Balans van het taalonderwijs aan het einde van de basisschool 2. [Results of language education at the end of elementary school]Amsterdam: Cito.
27.
Sikogukira, M. (1993). Influence of languages other than the L1 on a foreign language: A case of transfer from L2 to L3. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 110-132.
28.
Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol.II, pp.418-452). New York/ London: Longman.
29.
Steven Son, M., Schoonen, R., & Glopper, K.de( 2002). Inhibition or compensation? A multidimensional comparison of reading processes in Dutch and English. (Manuscript submitted for publication.)
30.
Thomas, J. (1988). The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 235-246.
31.
Valencia, J., & Cen Oz, J. (1993).Bilingualism and third language acquisition. ERIC Document Reproduction Service(ED 364 118).
32.
Vallen, T., & Stijnen, S. (1991). Ethnic minorities and ethnic minority languages in Dutch primary schools: Problems and challenges. Language and Education, 5, 113-123.
33.
Van Gelderen, A. (1995). Allochtone leerlingen in het vreemde-talenonderwijs; conclusies uit interviews en protocolanalyse. [Immigrant students in foreign language education; conclusions from interviews and protocol analysis]Enschede: NAP/MVT.
34.
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Glopper, K. de, Hulstijn, J., Snellings, P., Simis, A., & Steven Son, M. (in prep.). Linguistic knowledge, speed of access and metacognitive knowledge in first and second language reading comprehension .
35.
Verhallen, M., & Schoonen, R. (1993). Lexical knowledge of monolingual and bilingual children. Applied Linguistics, 14, 344-363.
36.
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (1989). Diagnose van kindertaal. Nederlandse taal vaardigheid van autochtone en allochtone kinderen. [Diagnosis of child language. Dutch language proficiency of native and non-native children.]Tilburg: Zwijsen.
37.
Walczyk, J.J. (1995). Testing a compensatory-encoding model. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 396-408.
38.
Walczyk , J.J. (2000). The interplay between automatic and control processes in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 554-566.
39.
Willems, M.M., & Oud-De-Glas, M.M.B. (1990). Vocabulaire selectie voor het vreemdetalenonderwijs. [Selection of vocabulary for foreign language education]Nijmegen: ITS.
40.
Woutersen, M. (1997).Bilingual word perception. Nijmegen: Katholieke UniversiteitNijmegen (Doctoral Dissertation).
