This article aims to describe the application of the standard of proof in arbitration and to question whether the standard to be applied should be the same as or lower than in ordinary civil justice as a result of the contractual origin of the dispute. The determination of the applicable standard takes into consideration the equality of arms and other guarantees of due process, along with the fact of the absence of the standard rule in the Arbitration Act 1996. The arbitrator shall establish these aspects at the beginning of the process, considering also the rules of burden of proof.
GorskeR (1959) Burden of proof in grievance arbitration. Marquette Law Review43: 135–179.
12.
GrandoS (2009) Evidence, Proof, and Fact-finding in WTO Dispute Settlement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
GuysM (2018) Saving time and cost international arbitration without hearing on the merits. ZDAR: Zeitschrift für Deutsches und Amerikanisches Recht41: 36–38.
14.
HaackS (2014) Evidence Matters: Science, Proof and Truth in the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HannibalMMountfordL (2002) The Law of Criminal and Civil Evidence: Principles and Practice. Harlow: Longman.
16.
HillE (2003) Due process at low cost: an empirical study of employment arbitration under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association. Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution18(3): 777–827.
17.
HörnleJ (2009) Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
JaksicA (2007) Procedural guarantees of human rights in arbitration proceedings. Journal of International Arbitration24(2): 159–172.
19.
LaudanL (2006) Truth, Error and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
20.
LawsonG (2017) Evidence of the Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
MurphyP (2008) Murphy of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
ParkW (2011) The Four Musketeers of arbitral duty: Neither one-for-all nor all-for one. International Chamber of Commerce Dossiers8: 25–45.
23.
PaulssonJ (2010) Arbitration in three dimensions. LSE Society, Economy Working Papers60, 291–323.
24.
PietrowskiR (2006) Evidence in international arbitration. Arbitration International22(3): 373–410.
25.
PoratASteinA (2001) Tort Liability under Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
RobertsPZuckermanA (2010) Criminal Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
RobertsSPalmersM (2005) Dispute Processes, ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
SandersP (1999) Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice—A Comparative Study. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
29.
ScheinmanM (1977) Evidence and Proof in Arbitration. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
StasonE (1941) Substantial evidence in administrative law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register89(8): 1026–1051.
31.
St John SuttonD (2015) Russell on Arbitration. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
32.
TaruffoM (2008) La prueba. Madrid: Editorial Marcial Pons.
33.
TuzetG (2018) Assessment criteria or standards of proof? An effort in clarification. Artificial Intelligence and Law28: 91–109.
34.
TwiningW (1993) Alternative to what? Theories of litigation, procedure and dispute settlement in angloamerican jurisprudence: some neglected classics. The Modern Law Review56(3): 380–392.
35.
WhiteM (1977) Dependency proceedings: What standard of proof—an argument against the standard of clear and convincing. San Diego Law Review14: 1155–1175.
36.
ZuckermanA (2013) Zuckerman on Civil Procedure Principles of Practice. UK: Sweet and Maxwell.
