Caring Ethical Climate and Formal Ethical Climate in Schools: Which of These Promotes Motivation and Citizenship Behaviors Among Teachers?

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between ethical perceptions and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), group organizational citizenship behavior (GOCB), and social loafing (SL). The study examined how formal and caring ethical climates serve as motivational factors that promote positive teacher behaviors. The study participants included 878 teachers, 50 principals, and 50 school counselors from 50 elementary schools. The data was analyzed using multilevel SEM. We found that the teachers’ perception of both formal and caring ethical climates is positively correlated with GOCB, and that their perception of a caring ethical climate is negatively correlated with their SL. Moreover, the principal’s perception of the school’s ethical climate was positively correlated with both teachers’ OCB and, paradoxically, SL. As for motivation, the teachers’ perception of the school’s caring ethical climate was found to be positively correlated with extrinsic motivation and negatively correlated with amotivation. These findings lead to the conclusion that principals should lead the development of a clear ethical framework as a mechanism for promoting school effectiveness.

Keywords

organizational citizenship behavior social loafing ethical climate motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

Fishbein

(2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Albarracín

Zanna

(Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes (pp. 173–221). Erlbaum.

Amichai-Hamburger

Koslowsky

Beckenstein-Aviran

(2000). The construction of the social loafing questionnaire. In Koslowsky

Stashevsky

(Eds.), Work values and organizational behavior: Toward the new millennium proceedings of the seventh bi-annual conference of the international society for the study of work and organizational values (ISSWOV).

Anderson

S. E.

Williams

L. J.

(1996). Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 282–296.

Arnold

Ducate

Kost

(2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431–448.

Berkovich

(2024). OCB saints and OCB sinners in schools: Effects of principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ motivation by OCB levels. ECNU Review of Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241256354

Bliese

P. D.

(2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass. https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/rc/workshops/mlm/Bliese_2000.pdf

Borrelli

Angelini

Santoro

P. E.

Rossi

M. F.

Gualano

M. R.

Moscato

Fiorilli

(2025). The role of ethical climate on teachers’ wellbeing: Relationship with psychophysical wellbeing and general health. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1631347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1631347

Boyatzis

R. E.

Rochford

(2020). Relational climate in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00085

Brenner

C. A.

(2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5

10.

Chan

W. Y.

Lau

Nie

Lim

Hogan

(2008). Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 597–630. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250185044_Organizational_and_Personal_Predictors_of_Teacher_Commitment_The_Mediating_Role_of_Teacher_Efficacy_and_Identification_With_School

11.

Chen

Son

(2014). Beyond leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation: An indigenous approach to leader–member relationship differentiation. Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 611–627. https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/887728.pdf

12.

Choong

Y.-O.

L.-P.

(2024). Shaping teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior through self-efficacy and trust in colleagues: Moderating role of collective efficacy. BMC Psychology, 12, 532. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02050-8

13.

Clugston

Howell

J. P.

Dorfman

P. W.

(2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management, 26, 5–30.

14.

Cohen

Kerene

(2008). Individual values and social exchange variables: Examining their relationship to and mutual effect on in-role performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Group & Organization Management, 33(4), 425–452.

15.

Cullen

J. B.

Victor

Bronson

J. W.

(1993). The ethical climate questionnaire: An assessment of its development and validity. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 667–674. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-12019-001

16.

Easo

Balaji

M. S.

Anbazhagan

(2020). Organizational citizenship behaviour, its antecedents and outcome: An empirical analysis. Shanlax International Journal of Management, 7(3), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.34293/management.v7i3.1610

17.

Enwereuzor

I. K.

Onyishi

I. E.

Albi-Oparaocha

F. C.

Amaeshi

(2020). Perceived leader integrity as a mediator between ethical leadership and ethical climate in a teaching context. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00420-6

18.

Gamliel

R. C.

Shapira-Lishchinsky

(2023). The impact of teacher and school factors on teachers’ perception of their personal and group organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22, 1036–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2022.2063748

19.

Geesa

(2024). Exploring school counselor-principal collaboration, self-efficacy, and school climate: A comprehensive review of literature. Deleted Journal. https://www.academia.edu/123775715

20.

George

J. M.

Bettenhausen

(1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.75.6.698

21.

Ghaleb

B. D. S.

(2024). Social loafing: Understanding, mitigating, and enhancing group performance. International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research, 2(9), 1321–1328. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384659859

22.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

23.

Grant

A. M.

Dutton

J. E.

Rosso

B. D.

(2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 898–918.

24.

Guo

Xue

Yasmin

(2022). Ethical leadership and workplace behavior in the education sector: The implications of employees’ ethical work behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1040000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040000

25.

Gurr

S. K.

Geron

Forster

D. J.

Levinson

(2025). Philosophical reflections on teachers’ ethical dilemmas in a global pandemic. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 44, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-024-09937-4

26.

Heck

R. H.

Thomas

S. L.

(2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using mplus (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/An-Introduction-to-Multilevel-Modeling-Techniques-MLM-and-SEM-Approaches/Heck-Thomas/p/book/9781848725522

27.

Hefetz

Liberman

(2017). The factor analysis procedure for exploration: A short guide with examples/El análisis factorial exploratorio: Una guía breve con ejemplos. Culture and Education, 29(3), 526–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2017.1365425

28.

Huntera

E. M.

Neuberta

M. J.

Perryb

S. J.

Wittc

L. A.

Penney

L. M.

Weinbergerc

(2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316–331.

29.

Hyusein

Eyupoglu

S. Z.

(2022). Ethical leadership, organisational citizenship behaviours and social loafing: The mediating effect of perceived organisational politics. South African Journal of Business Management, 53(1), a2842. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v53i1.2842

30.

Jauch

L. R.

Osborn

R. N.

Terpening

W. D.

(1980). Research notes: Goal congruence employee orientations: The substitution effect. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 544–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/255518

31.

Jiang

(2010). The relationship between organizational identification and organizational outcomes [Conference session]. 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science.

32.

Kaduma

K. D.

(2024). Compliance toward ethical leadership among school principals: A synthesis of qualitative research-based evidences. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 16(1), 6–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1428868.pdf

33.

Kaptein

(2020). Ethical climate and ethical culture. In Poff

Michalos

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of business and professional ethics (pp. 1–4). Springer.

34.

Karau

S. J.

Williams

K. D.

(1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.681

35.

Keiser

K. A.

Schulte

L. E.

(2007). The development and validation of the Elementary School Ethical Climate Index. The School Community Journal, 17(2), 73–88. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ794785.pdf

36.

Kohlberg

(1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. Academic Press.

37.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Klein

K. J.

(2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232580888_A_multilevel_approach_to_theory_and_research_in_organizations_Contextual_temporal_and_emergent_processes

38.

Lavy

(2019). Daily dynamics of teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Social and emotional antecedents and outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02863

39.

Lisbona

B. A.

Morales

D. J. F.

Palací

D. F. J.

(2006). [Identity and commitment in emergency teams]. Psicothema, 18(3), 407–412.

40.

Maitlis

Christianson

(2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 57–125.

41.

Midthassel

U. V.

(2004). Teacher involvement in school development activity and its relationships to attitudes and subjective norms among teachers: A study of Norwegian elementary and junior high school teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x03261801

42.

Wang

Akrivou

Booth

S. A.

(2012). Look up, look around: Is there anything different about team-level OCB in China? Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 818–832. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-03332-005

43.

Neves

M. D. L. G

. (2025). The relationship between ethical leadership, teacher motivation, and commitment in public schools in Portugal. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1456685. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1456685

44.

OECD. (2020a). Teachers’ Professional Learning and Well-being: Findings from TALIS 2018. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis

45.

OECD. (2020b). Education Policy Outlook 2020: Shaping Responsive and Resilient Education Systems. https://www.oecd.org/education/education-policy-outlook-2020

46.

Organ

D. W.

(1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-97376-000

47.

Panadero

Järvelä

(2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226

48.

Pandey

S. K.

Wright

B. E.

Moynihan

D. P.

(2008). Public service motivation and interpersonal citizenship behavior in public organizations: Testing a preliminary model. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887947

49.

Papaloi

Balasi

Iordanidis

(2024). Ethical leadership and ethical climate at educational organizations in Europe: Depicting the “value” of values. European Journal of Education, 7(1), 1–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1414664.pdf

50.

Penner

L. A.

Dovidio

J. F.

Piliavin

J. A.

Schroeder

D. A.

(2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-00779-014

51.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

52.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

53.

Santiago-Torner

Jiménez-Pérez

Tarrats-Pons

(2025). Ethical climate, intrinsic motivation, and affective commitment: The impact of depersonalization. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15040055

54.

Severiens

Pulinx

Hajer

Denessen

Veerman

G. J.

(2025). Teachers and social cohesion in diverse secondary classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 31(6), 1046–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2446732

55.

Sheedy

Garcia

Jepsen

(2021). The role of risk climate and ethical self-interest climate in predicting unethical pro-organisational behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04542-0

56.

Shua

(2023). The relationship between school ethical climate and school effectiveness in Israel 2020. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 27, 67–91. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2023.27.05

57.

Somech

Drach-Zahavy

(2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 649–659. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222657818_Understanding_extra-role_behavior_in_schools_The_relationships_between_job_satisfaction_sense_of_efficacy_and_teachers'_extra-role_behavior

58.

Song

Zhou

Wang

Feng

Xiang

(2024). Investigating the antecedents of employee authenticity from the organizational context: the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Current Psychology, 43, 15352–15365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05479-z

59.

Sun

Liu

Ding

Jiang

(2024). The relationship between school organizational climate and teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of teaching efficacy and moderating role of optimistic traits. Behavioral Sciences, 14(12), 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121130

60.

Tan

H. H.

Tan

M. L.

(2008). Organizational citizenship behavior and social loafing: The role of personality, motives, and contextual factors. Journal of Psychology, 142(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.142.1.89-112

61.

Tosuntaş

Ş. B

. (2020). Diffusion of responsibility in group work: Social loafing. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 344–358. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1280794.pdf

62.

Tremblay

M. A.

Blanchard

C. M.

Taylor

Pelletier

L. G.

Villeneuve

(2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 41(4), 213–226.

63.

Tsemach

Barth

(2025). Authentic leadership as a predictor of organizational citizenship behaviour and teachers’ burnout: What’s ‘quiet quitting’ got to do with it? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(5), 1105–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231212288

64.

van Dick

Stellmacher

Wagner

Lemmer

Tissington

P. A

. (2009). Group membership salience and task performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(7), 609–626. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41116591_Group_Membership_Salience_and_Task_Performance

65.

Vardi

Weitz

(2004). Misbehavior in Organizations. Organization Science, 7(2), 151–165.

66.

Victor

Cullen

J. B.

(1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857

67.

Vigoda-Gadot

Beeri

Birman-Shemesh

Somech

(2007). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior in the education system: A scale reconstruction and validation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 462–493. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253047969_Group-Level_Organizational_Citizenship_Behavior_in_the_Education_System_A_Scale_Reconstruction_and_Validation

68.

Walumbwa

F. O.

Hartnell

C. A.

Oke

(2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517–529. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44605960_Servant_Leadership_Procedural_Justice_Climate_Service_Climate_Employee_Attitudes_and_Organizational_Citizenship_Behavior_A_Cross-Level_Investigation

69.

Zacarias

A. M.

Flores

J. E.

(2024). Exploring school leaders’ ethical leadership and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior. Puissant. Advance online publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372234849

70.

Zysberg

(2020). Agreeableness, emotional intelligence, OCB and teachers’ job performance. Multi Colors: An International Journal of Educational Research and Theory, 2(2), 26–36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340023104_Agreeableness_Emotional_intelligence_OCB_and_Teachers'_Job_Performance