This article raises important questions about whether the increasing control of early years education through performance data is genuinely a means for school improvement. This composite article, examines the pervasiveness of attainment data in early years education professional activity, its impact on early years teachers’ consciousness and identity and the narrowing and instrumentalisation of early years pedagogy. The authors argue that, rather than improving quality, the current obsession with performance data and its stretch down the age range has the potential to undermine the foundations for children’s personal development and learning. The article also points to the ways in which a triage effect has led to the neglect of some children in order to push targeted children over specific performativity hurdles. The discussion applies Foucault to the early education sector in England and builds upon other early childhood researchers such as Moss.
BallS. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228.
2.
BallS. (2013). The education debate: Politics and policy in the 21st century. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
3.
BallS.MaguireM.BraunA.PerrymanJ.HoskinsK. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27, 513–533.
4.
BallS.OlmedoA. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 85–96.
5.
Booher-JenningsJ. (2005). Below the bubble: ‘Educational triage’ and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231–268.
6.
BradburyA. (2012a). Education policy and the ‘ideal learner’: Producing recognisable learner-subjects through early years assessment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34, 1–19.
7.
BradburyA. (2012b). ‘I feel absolutely incompetent’: Professionalism, policy and early childhood teachers. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13, 175–186.
8.
BradburyA. (2013). Understanding early years inequality: Policy, assessment and young children’s identities. London, England: Routledge.
9.
BroadheadP. (2006). Developing an understanding of young children’s learning through play: The place of observation, interaction and reflection. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 191–207.
10.
CreswellJ. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, England: SAGE.
FenwickT.MangezE.OzgaJ. (Eds.). (2014). Governing knowledge, comparison, knowledge-based technologies and expertise in the regulation of education (World Yearbook of Education 2014). London, England: Routledge.
15.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, England: Penguin Books.
16.
GillbornD.YoudellD. (2000). Rationing education: Policy practice reform and equity. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
LingardB.MartinoW.Rezai-RashtiG. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 539–556.
19.
MarksR. (2012). ‘I get the feeling that this is really unfair’: Educational triage in primary mathematics. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 32(2), 58–63.
20.
MossP. (Ed.). (2012). Early childhood and compulsory education: Reconceptualising the relationship (Contesting Early Childhood). London, England: Routledge.
21.
MossP. (2014). Transformative change and real Utopias in early childhood education: A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
22.
NikelJ.LoweJ. (2010). Talking of fabric: A multi-dimensional model of quality in education. Compare, 40, 589–605.
23.
OzgaJ. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 149–162.
24.
OzgaJ.Dahler-LarsenP.SegerholmC.SimolaH. (2011). Fabricating quality in education: Data and governance in Europe. London, England: Routledge.
25.
OzgaJ. (2013). Accountability as a policy technology: Accounting for education performance in Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 292–309.
26.
PerrymanJ. (2009). Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 611–631.
27.
Roberts-HolmesG. (2015). The ‘datafication’ of early years pedagogy: ‘If the teaching is good, the data should be good and if there’s bad teaching, there is bad data. Journal of Education Policy, 30, 302–315. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.924561
SelwynN.HendersonM.ChaoS. (2015). Exploring the role of digital data in contemporary schools and schooling: ‘200,000 lines in an Excel spreadsheet’. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 767–781. doi: 10.1002/berj.3186
30.
WilliamsonB. (2014, May16). Reassembling children as data doppelgangers: How databases are making education machine-readable. In Powerful Knowledge Conference, University of Bristol, UK.
