This article considers the male experience of conducting fieldwork in massage parlours; off-street environments in which women exchange sexual services in predominantly heterosexual monetary transactions. It critically examines debates surrounding the desirability of gender incongruence between researchers and their informants. By acknowledging the complex interplay of gender and relations in the field, experiences of power are presented as variable rather than fixed. Honest and detailed accounts of interactions with sex workers illustrate the complexities of embodying masculinity in clandestine and feminized spaces. The perceived benefits and limitations of gender incongruence are presented. The need to consciously manage and comprehensively reflect upon the impacts of gender, in addition to the complex array of power dynamics in the field is discussed.
AckerlyBTrueJ (2010) Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
BlackmanSJ (2007) Hidden ethnography: Crossing emotional borders in qualitative accounts of young people’s lives. Sociology41(4): 699–716.
3.
BohanJS (1993) Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly17(1): 5–21.
4.
CooperE (2016) ‘It’s better than daytime television’: Questioning the socio-spatial impacts of massage parlours on residential communities. Sexualities19(5–6): 547–566.
5.
DeauxKMajorB (1990) A social-psychological model of gender. In: RhodeDL (ed) Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 89–99.
6.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (1998) The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
EnguixB (2014) Negotiating the field: Rethinking ethnographic authority, experience and the frontiers of research. Qualitative Research14(1): 79–94.
8.
FinchJ (1984) ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to’: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In: BellCRobertsH (eds) Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 70–87.
9.
Gill F and Maclean C (2002) Knowing your place: gender and reflexivity in two ethnographies. Sociological Research Online 7(2). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/gill.html (accessed 19 April 2019).
10.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Allen Lane.
11.
GoffmanE (1968) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
12.
GroesC (2017) ‘Seducing the seducer’. In: SpangerMSkilbreiML (eds) Prostitution Research in Context: Methodology, Representation and Power, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 157–172.
13.
GurneyJN (1985) Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male-dominated setting. Qualitative Sociology8(1): 42–62.
14.
HammondNKingstonS (2014) Experiencing stigma as sex work researchers in professional and personal lives. Sexualities17(3): 329–247.
15.
HornR (1997) Not ‘one of the boys’: Women researching the police. Journal of Gender Studies6(3): 297–308.
16.
HubbardP (1999a) Researching female sex work: Reflections on geographical exclusion, critical methodologies and ‘useful’ knowledge. Area31(3): 229–237.
17.
HubbardP (1999b) Sex and the City: Geographies of Prostitution in the Urban West, Aldershot: Ashgate.
18.
KöppingKP (2002) Shattering Frames: Transgressions and Transformations in Anthropological Discourse and Practice, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
19.
LetherbyG (2003) Feminist Research in Theory and Practice, Buckingham: Open University Press.
20.
LucalB (1999) What it means to be gendered me: Life on the boundaries of a dichotomous gender system. Gender & Society13(6): 781–797.
21.
MaginnPSteinmetzC (2015) Spatial and regulatory contours of the (sub)urban sexscape. In: MaginnPSteinmetzC (eds) (Sub)urban Sexscapes: Geographies and Regulation of the Sex Industry, London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.
22.
Mai N (2009) Migrant workers in the UK sex industry: Full research report ESRC end of award report. RES-062-23-0137. Swindon: ESRC.
23.
MaiN (2013) Embodied cosmopolitanisms: The subjective mobility of migrants working in the global sex industry. Gender, Place and Culture20(1): 107–124.
24.
MaynardM (1998) Feminists’ knowledge and the knowledge of feminisms: Epistemology, theory, methodology and method. In: MayTWilliamsM (eds) Knowing the Social World, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 120–137.
25.
OakleyA (1981) Women interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In: RobertsH (ed) Doing Feminist Research, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 30–61.
26.
OakleyA (2016) Interviewing women again: Power, time, and the gift. Sociology50(1): 195–213.
27.
O’Connell DavidsonJ (1998) Prostitution, Power and Freedom, Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
OrtizSM (2004) Leaving the private world of wives of professional athletes: A male sociologist’s reflections. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33(4): 466–487.
29.
OrtizSM (2005) The ethnographic process of gender management: Doing the ‘right’ masculinity with wives of professional athletes. Qualitative Inquiry11(2): 265–290.
30.
OverallC (1992) What’s wrong with prostitution? Evaluating sex work. Signs: Journal of Women Culture and Society17(4): 705–724.
31.
ParkerA (2016) Staying onside on the inside: Men, masculinities and the research process. In: WardMRM (ed) Gender Identity and Research Relationships, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 105–122.
32.
PhoenixA (1994) Practising feminist research: The intersections of gender and ‘race’ in the research process. In: MaynardMPurvisJ (eds) Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 49–71.
33.
Poulton E (2012) ‘If you had balls, you’d be one of us!’ Doing gendered research: Methodological reflections on being a female academic researcher in the hyper-masculine subculture of ‘football hooliganism’. Sociological Research Online 17(4). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/4/4.html (accessed 19 April 2019).
34.
RenoldE (2000) ‘Coming out’: Gender, (hetero)sexuality and the primary school. Gender and Education12(3): 309–332.
35.
RenoldE (2006) ‘They won’t let us play unless you’re going out with one of them’: Girls, boys and Butler’s ‘heterosexual matrix’ in the primary years. British Journal of Sociology of Education27(4): 489–509.
36.
RingroseJRenoldE (2014) ‘F**k rape!’: Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 772–780.
37.
SalleeMWHarrisFIII (2011) Gender performance in qualitative studies of masculinities. Qualitative Research11(4): 409–429.
38.
SampsonHThomasM (2003) Lone researchers at sea: Gender, risk and responsibility. Qualitative Research3(2): 165–189.
39.
SandersT (2005) Sex Work: A Risky Business, Collumpton: Willan Publishing.
40.
SandersT (2008) Paying for Pleasure: Men Who Buy Sex, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
41.
SandersT (2012) Sex Work: A Risky Business, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
42.
SandersT (2016) Inevitably violent? Dynamics of space, governance, and stigma in understanding violence against sex workers. Law, Politics and Society71: 93–114.
43.
SandersTO’NeillMPitcherJ (2009) Prostitution: Sex Work, Policy and Politics, London: SAGE.
44.
SandersSScoularJCampbellRPitcherJ, et al. (2018) Internet Sex Work: Beyond the Gaze, ebook: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
SimmelG (1924) The sociological significance of the ‘stranger’. In: ParkREBurgessEW (eds) Introduction to the Science of Sociology, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 322–327.
46.
SkipperJKMcCaghyCH (1972) Respondents’ intrusion upon the situation: The problem of interviewing subjects with special qualities. The Sociological Quarterly13(2): 237–243.
47.
SparkeM (1996) Displacing the field in fieldwork: Masculinity, metaphor and space. In: DuncanN (ed) Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality, London: Routledge, pp. 212–231.
48.
StahlG (2016) Relationship-building in research: Gendered identity construction in research–participant interaction. In: WardMRM (ed) Gender Identity and Research Relationships, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 145–165.
49.
StanleyL (1996) The mother of investigation: Necessity, writing and representations. In: WilkinsonSKitzingerC (eds) Representing the Other: A Feminism and Psychology Reader, London: SAGE.
50.
Thomas GM (2014) The Everyday Work of Healthcare Professionals: An Ethnography of Screening for Down’s Syndrome in UK Antenatal Care. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University, UK.
51.
Thomas GM (2017) Doing gender in a hospital setting: Reflections of a male researcher. Sociological Research Online. 22 (2): 14. Available at: www.socresonline.org.uk/22/2/14.html (accessed 19 April 2019).
52.
ThomasJWilliamsD (2016) Getting off on s. ex research: A methodological commentary on the sexual desires of sex researchers Sexualities19(1/2): 83–97.
53.
TroynaB (1998) ‘The whites of my eyes, nose, ears …’: A reflexive account of ‘whiteness’ in race-related research. In: ConnollyPTroynaB (eds) Researching Racism in Education: Politics, Theory and Practice, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 95–108.
54.
WilkinsonSKitzingerC (1996) Representing the Other: A Feminism and Psychology Reader, London: SAGE.
