Modern orders were founded on the repudiation of sexual ambiguity and the confinement of desire within discursive classifications of man/woman and hetero/homosexual binaries. However, the persistence of bisexual practices reveals the unstable nature of these modern binary regimes, which require the “erasure” of bisexuality to perpetuate their status quo. Yet some men negotiate their bisexual desires in productive ways without undermining their sense of masculinity and sexual agency. Based on qualitative interviews I explore the sexualities of a group of these men—Latino men who have sex with men and women in southern California. I find that sex with women involves interactional work that is more demanding on impression management and moral grounds. Sex with men is rougher, adventurous, and less restrained. I conclude that sex with men opens liminal spaces that resist binary definition and are less discursively regulated—relative “anti-structures” à la Victor Turner that decouple agency from (hetero)structure. This transgressive liminality is key to understanding these same-sex spaces' recurrent attraction and productive pleasure. The study challenges monolithic understandings of migrant sexualities by finding great diversity among non-gay identified men, including homoerotic practices combined with strong desire for women.
Anderlini-D'OnofrioSAlexanderJ (2009) Introduction to the special issue: Bisexuality and queer theory: Intersections, diversions, and connections. Journal of Bisexuality9(3–4): 197–212.
2.
AndersonEMcCormackM (2015) Cuddling and spooning: Heteromasculinity and homosocial tactility among student-athletes. Men and Masculinities18(2): 214–230.
3.
AngelidesS (2001) A History of Bisexuality, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
AngelidesS (2006) Historicizing (bi)sexuality. Journal of Homosexuality52(1): 125–158.
5.
BeasleyC (2015a) Introduction to special issue of men and masculinities: Heterodox hetero-masculinities. Men and Masculinities18(2): 135–139.
6.
BeasleyC (2015b) Libidinal heterodoxy, heterosexuality, hetero-masculinity, and ‘transgression’. Men and Masculinities18(2): 140–158.
7.
BrookH (2015) Bros before ho(mo)s: Hollywood bromance and the limits of heterodoxy. Men and Masculinities18(2): 249–266.
8.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
9.
CallisAS (2009) Playing with Butler and Foucault: Bisexuality and queer theory. Journal of Bisexuality9(3): 213–233.
10.
CallisAS (2014) Bisexual, pansexual, queer: Non-binary identities and the sexual borderlands. Sexualities17(1/2): 63–80.
11.
CarrilloH (2002) The Night is Young: Sexuality in Mexico in the Time of AIDS, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
CarrilloH (2017) Pathways of Desire: The Sexual Migration of Mexican Gay Men, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
CarrilloHFontdevilaJ (2014) Border crossings and shifting sexualities among Mexican gay immigrant men: Beyond monolithic conceptions. Sexualities17(8): 919–938.
14.
CarrilloHHoffmanA (2016) From MSM to heteroflexibilities: Non-exclusive straight male identities and their implications for HIV prevention and health promotion. Global Public Health11(7–8): 923–936.
15.
CarrilloHHoffmanA (2017) ‘Straight with a pinch of bi’: The construction of heterosexuality as an elastic category among adult US men. Sexualities. Epub ahead of print 7 February 2017. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1363460716678561.
DeanJJ (2011) The cultural construction of heterosexual identities. Sociology Compass5(8): 679–687.
18.
DeanJJ (2013) Heterosexual masculinities, anti-homophobias, and shifts in hegemonic masculinity: The identity practices of black and white heterosexual men. The Sociological Quarterly54(4): 534–560.
19.
D'EmilioJ (1992) Making Trouble: Essays on Gay History, Politics, and the University, New York: Routledge.
20.
FontdevilaJ (2006) Phenomenologies of the akratic self: Masculinity, regrets, and HIV among men on methadone. Journal of Urban Health83(4): 586–601.
21.
FoucaultM (1990 [1978]) The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction, New York: Vintage Books.
22.
FoucaultM (1996) Sex, power and the politics of identity. In: LotringerS (ed) Foucault Live: Collected Interviews, 1961–1984, New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 382–390.
23.
FisherN (2013) Seeing ‘straight’, contemporary critical heterosexuality studies and sociology: An introduction. The Sociological Quarterly54(4): 501–510.
24.
GonzálezMA (2007) Latinos on da down low: The limitations of sexual identity in public health. Latino Studies5(1): 25–52.
25.
GreenAI (2008) Erotic habitus: Toward a sociology of desire. Theory and Society37(6): 597–626.
26.
HackingI (1999) The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
HackingI (2002) How ‘natural’ are ‘kinds’ of sexual orientation?Law and Philosophy21(1): 95–107.
28.
HerdtG (1997) Same Sex, Different Cultures: Exploring Gay and Lesbian Lives, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
HutchinsLKaahumanuL (1991) Bi Any Other Name: Bisexual People Speak Out, Boston, MA: Alyson.
30.
KatzJ (2007) The Invention of Heterosexuality, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
LamontMMolnárV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
32.
LaqueurT (1990) Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
McCormackM (2012) The Declining Significance of Homophobia: How Teenage Boys are Redefining Masculinity and Homophobia, New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
McCormackMAndersonE (2010) ‘It's just not acceptable any more’: The erosion of homophobia and the softening of Masculinity at an English sixth form. Sociology44(5): 843–859.
35.
Munoz-LaboyMA (2004) Beyond ‘MSM’: Sexual desire among bisexually-active Latino men in New York City. Sexualities7(1): 55–80.
36.
Munoz-LaboyMDodgeB (2005) Bisexual practices: Patterns, meanings, and implications for HIV/STI prevention among bisexually active Latino men and their partners. Journal of Bisexuality5(1): 81–100.
37.
Munoz-LaboyMDodgeB (2007) Bisexual Latino men and HIV and sexually transmitted infections risk: An exploratory analysis. American Journal of Public Health97(6): 1102–1106.
38.
Nunez NoriegaG (1999 [1994]) Sexo entre Varones: Poder y Resistencia en el Campo Sexual, México, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
39.
RubinG (1992 [1984]) Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: VanceCS (ed) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, pp. 267–319.
40.
SchutzA (1967 [1932]) The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
41.
SilvaT (2017a) Bud-sex: Constructing normative masculinity among rural straight men that have sex with men. Gender & Society31(1): 51–73.
42.
SilvaT (2017b) ‘Helpin’ a buddy out’: Perceptions of identity and behavior among rural straight men that have sex with each other. Sexualities. Epub ahead of print 8 February 2017 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1363460716678564.
43.
StorrM (1999) Bisexuality: A Critical Reader, New York: Routledge.
44.
TuckerN (1995) Bisexual Politics: Theories, Queries, and Visions, New York: Haworth Press.
45.
TurnerV (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
46.
Vidal-Ortiz S, Decena C, Carrillo H, et al. (2010) Revisiting activos and pasivos: Toward new cartographies of Latino/Latin American male same-sex desire. In: Asencio M (ed.) Latina/oSexualities: Probing Powers, Passions, Practices, and Policies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 253–273.
47.
WardJ (2008) Dude-sex: White masculinities and ‘authentic’ heterosexuality among dudes who have sex with dudes. Sexualities11(4): 414–434.
48.
WardJ (2015) Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men, New York: New York University Press.
49.
WestCZimmermanDH (1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society1(2): 125–151.
