Hook-up websites and apps are said to be transforming the sexual lives of gay men and have been linked with the apparent erosion of gay publics as the basis for identity politics and social action. This article examines these dynamics in the interview and focus-group talk of gay men living on the economic and geographical margins of metropolitan gay culture. It offers perspectives on the importance of location – class, generation and space – for the experience of digital media, the negotiation of safety, and the new codifications and elaborations on sex with the (non) stranger; a figure who is not alien, yet not familiar, in sexual sociality. Reflecting on these situated perspectives in connection with debates on the erosion of gay publics, this article argues against monolithic framings of gay men’s sexual lives after digital media.
ArvidssonA (2006) ‘Quality singles’: Internet dating and the work of fantasy. New Media & Society8(4): 671–690.
2.
AttwoodF (2006) Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualisation of culture. Sexualities9(1): 77–94.
3.
BerlantLWarnerM (2005) Sex in public. In: WarnerM (ed.) Publics and Counterpublics, New York: Zone Books, pp. 187–208.
4.
BlackwellCBirnholtzJAbbottC (2014) Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society17(7): 1117–1136.
5.
ButlerJ (2005) Giving an Account of Oneself, New York: Fordham University Press.
6.
CampbellJ (2005) Outing PlanetOut: Surveillance, gay marketing and internet affinity portals. New Media & Society7(5): 663–683.
7.
ConnellRDavisMDowsettG (1993) A bastard of a life: Homosexual desire and practice among men in working-class milieux. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Public Health29(1): 112–135.
8.
CouchDLiamputtongP (2008) Online dating and mating: The use of the internet to meet sexual partners. Qualitative Health Research18(2): 268–279.
9.
DavisM (2008) The ‘loss of community’ and other problems for sexual citizenship in recent HIV prevention. Sociology of Health and Illness30(2): 182–196.
10.
DavisM (2009) Sex, Technology and Public Health, Houndmills: Palgrave.
11.
DavisMHartGBoldingG (2006a) E-dating, identity and HIV prevention: Theorising sexualities, risk and network society. Sociology of Health & Illness28(4): 457–478.
12.
DavisMHartGBoldingG (2006b) Sex and the internet: Gay men, risk reduction and serostatus. Culture, Health and Sexuality8(2): 161–174.
13.
DowsettGWilliamsH (2008) ‘Taking it like a man’: Masculinity and barebacking online. Sexualities11(1–2): 121–141.
14.
FrankisJFlowersP (2005) Men who have sex with men (MSM) in public sex environments (PSEs) – a systematic review of quantitative literature. AIDS Care17(3): 273–288.
15.
FrankisJFlowersP (2009) Public sexual cultures: A systematic review of qualitative research investigating men’s sexual behaviors with men in public spaces. Journal of Homosexuality56(7): 1–33.
16.
Frankis J, et al. (2013a) Social Media, Men who have Sex with Men and Sexual Health in Lanarkshire: A report for BBV NHS Lanarkshire based upon the Social Media, Men who have Sex with Men and Sexual Health Survey 2013. April 2013. Available at: http://www.sexualhealthnetwork.org.uk/smmash_quant_report/ (accessed 16 February 2016).
17.
Frankis J, et al. (2013b) Social Media, Lanarkshire Men who have Sex with Men and Sexual Health: An Experiential Qualitative Analysis. Available at: http://www.sexualhealthnetwork.org.uk/smmash_qualitative/ (accessed 16 February 2016).
18.
GiddensA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.
19.
GosineA (2007) Brown to blonde at Gay.com: Passing white in queer cyberspace. In: O’RiordanKPhillipsD (eds) Queer Online: Media, Technology and Sexuality, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 139–153.
20.
GudelunasD (2012) There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture16(4): 347–365.
21.
HardeyM (2004) Mediated relationships: Authenticity and the possibility of romance. Information, Communication and Society7(2): 207–222.
22.
HatalaMPrehodkaJ (1996) Content analysis of gay male and lesbian personal advertisements. Psychological Reports78(2): 371–374.
23.
HoltM (2011) Gay men and ambivalence about ‘gay community’: From gay community attachment to personal communities. Culture Health & Sexuality13(8): 857–871.
24.
HumphreysL (1970) Tearoom Trade: A Study of Homosexual Encounters in Public Places, London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.
25.
LanerMKamelG (1977) Media mating I: Newspaper ‘personals’ ads of homosexual men. Journal of Homosexuality3(2): 149–162.
26.
National Records of Scotland (2014) Council Area: North Lanarkshire, Population Data. and Council Area: South Lanarkshire, Population Data. Available at: http://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/ods-web/area.html (accessed 1December 2014).
27.
PhillipsGMagnusMKuoI (2014) Use of geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications to find men for sex by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington, DC. AIDS & Behavior18(9): 1630–1637.
28.
RaceK (2010) Click here for HIV status: Shifting templates of sexual negotiation. Emotion, Space and Society3(1): 7–14.
29.
Race K (2014) (published online: 03 Jul 2014) Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: online hook-up devices in gay life. Culture Health & Sexuality. Published online ahead of print 3 July 2014. DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2014.930181.
30.
Race K (2015) ‘Party ‘n’ play’ Online hook-up devices and the emergence of PNP practices among gay men. Sexualities 18(3): 253–275.
31.
RoweMDowsettG (2008) Sex, love, friendship, belonging and place: Is there a role for ‘gay community’ in HIV prevention today?Culture Health & Sexuality10(4): 329–344.
32.
SmaillB (2004) Online personals and narratives of the self: Australia’s RSVP. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10(1): 93–107.
33.
ThompsonJ (1995) The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of Media, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
TurkleS (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, New York: Basic Books.
35.
Van DoornN (2010) The ties that bind: The networked performance of gender, sexuality and friendship on MySpace. New Media & Society12(4): 583–602.
36.
Van DoornN (2011) Digital spaces, material traces: How matter comes to matter in online performances of gender, sexuality and embodiment. Media, Culture & Society33(4): 531–547.
37.
ZablotskaIHoltMPrestageG (2012) Changes in gay men’s participation in gay community life: Implications for HIV surveillance and research. AIDS & Behavior16(3): 669–675.
