In this article, I examine performance artists Lee Mingwei and Virgil Wong’s long-running online art installation project, POP! The First Human Male Pregnancy, as a liminal science fiction-like space in which the relationships between gender, sexuality, technology, and pregnancy, are illuminated and, at times, rearranged. Secondly, I look at user-generated content on YouTube left in response to one part of Lee and Wong’s installation as a further site for meaning-making about male pregnancy. In both these sites, I argue that the meaning-making of male pregnancy is transgressive in its queering of pregnancy while remaining normative in its reflection of male/female binary gender categories.
Åström B (2010) ‘Let’s get those Winchesters pregnant’: Male pregnancy in ‘Supernatural’ fan fiction. Transformative Works and Cultures 4. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3983/twc.2010.0135.
2.
AristarkhovaI (2009) Man as hospitable space: The male pregnancy project. Performance Research14(4): 25–30.
3.
BancroftA (2011) Leigh Bowery: Queer in fashion, queer in art. Sexualities15(1): 68–79.
4.
ClarkeAShimJMamoL (2003) Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review68(2): 161–194.
5.
ChenM (2011) Toxic animacies, inanimate affections. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies17(2–3): 265–286.
6.
ChenM (2012) Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
Cruz T (2011) Thomas Beatie and reactions from the trans community. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University, USA.
HarawayD (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, New York: Routledge.
10.
HaywardE (2010a) Fingeryeyes: Expressions of cup corals. Cultural Anthropology25(4): 577–599.
11.
HaywardE (2010b) SpiderCitySex. Woman & Performance – A Journal of Feminist Theory20(3): 225–251.
12.
HaywardE (2012) Sensational jellyfish: Aquarium affects and the matter of immersion. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies23(3): 161–196.
13.
Ingram-Waters M (2009) Public fiction as knowledge production: The case of the Raelians' cloning claims. Public Understanding of Science 18(3): 292–308.
KaplanESquierS (1999) Introduction. In: KaplanESquierS (eds) Playing Dolly: Technocultural Formations, Fantasies, and Fictions of Assisted Reproduction, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 1–13.
16.
LakoffGJohnsonM (1980) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
LingL (1999) Sex machine: Global hypermasculinity and images of the Asian woman in modernity. Positions7(2): 277–306.
18.
MamoL (2007) Queering Reproduction: Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technoscience, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
McCrayW (2005) Will small be beautiful? Making policies for our nanotech future. History and Technology21(2): 177–203.
20.
PenleyC (1997) NASA/TREK: Popular Science and Sex in America, New York: Verso.
21.
Reitman I (Dir.) (1994) Junior [film]. Northern Lights Entertainment and Universal Studios, USA.
22.
SchwabG (1999) Steps toward a millennial imaginary: Reproductive fantasies in Cussin’s Confessions of a Bioterrorist. In: KaplanESquierS (eds) Playing Dolly: Technocultural Formations, Fantasies, and Fictions of Assisted Reproduction, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 232–240.
23.
ShapiroE (2010) Gender Circuits: Bodies and Identities in a Technological Age, New York: Routledge.
24.
SquierS (1994) Babies in Bottles: Twentieth Century Visions of Reproductive Technology, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25.
SquierS (1999) From Omega to Mr. Adam: The importance of literature for feminist science studies. Science, Technology and Human Values24(1): 132–158.
26.
SquierS (2004) Liminal lives: Imagining the human at the frontiers of biomedicine, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
SteinL (2006) ‘This dratted thing’: Fannish storytelling through new media. In: HelleksonKBusseK (eds) Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays, Jefferson, NC: McFarland, pp. 243–260.
28.
SteinmullerK (2003) The uses and abuses of science fiction. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews28(3): 175–178.
29.
WaldbyC (2000) The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine, New York: Routledge.
