Sexism, heteronormativity and mononormativity are constitutively entangled, but to what extent does undoing one undo the others? Through a reading of HBO’s Big Love, a television series about a polygamous family that is conservative in every way except their plural marriage, this article argues that there are ways in which intimacy might be politically transgressive even as it reinforces gender and sexual norms. Expanding on the definition of ‘mononormativity’ through analogy to Berlant and Warner’s (1998) ‘heteronormativity’ it is argued that in order to do justice to the complexity of intimate politics we must attend to relational norms and their transgression.
AnapolDM (2010) Polyamory in the Twenty-First Century: Love and Intimacy with Multiple Partners, New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
2.
AndreasenLV (2009) Revenge of the patriarchy: Is Big Love big enough?Quarterly Review of Film and Video26(5): 406–414.
3.
Barker M and Langdridge D (2010) Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities 13(6): 748–772. (Cites Pieper M and Bauer R (2005) Call for Papers: International Conference on Polyamory and Mono-normativity).
4.
BerlantLWarnerM (1998) Sex in public. Critical Inquiry24(2): 547–566.
5.
Emens EF (2004) Monogamy’s Law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence (University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 58). New York University Review of Law and Social Change 29: 277. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.506242 (accessed 23 November 2014).
6.
GilmartinSK (2007) Crafting heterosexual masculine identities on campus: College men talk about romantic love. Men and Masculinities9(4): 530–539.
7.
HidalgoDABarberKHunterE (2008) The dyadic imaginary: Troubling the perception of love as dyadic. Journal of Bisexuality7(3–4): 171–189.
8.
HuntingK (2014) Love between sisters: Queering polygamy in Big Love. The Journal of Popular Culture47(1): 129–152.
9.
KlesseC (2007) The Spectre of Promiscuity: Gay Male and Bisexual Non-monogamies and Polyamories, Farnham: Ashgate.
10.
OlsenMVSchefferW(Writer) (2006–2011) Big Love, USA: HBO.
11.
ParkSM (2013) Mothering Queerly, Queering Motherhood: Resisting Monomaternalism in Adoptive, Lesbian, Blended, and Polygamous Families, Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
PetrellaS (2005) Only with you – maybe – if you make me happy: A genealogy of serial monogamy as governance and self-governance. In: BreenMSPetersF (eds) Genealogies of Identity. Interdisciplinary Readings on Sex and Sexuality, New York: Rodopi BV, pp. 169–183.
13.
RichA (1996) Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. In: JacksonSScottS (eds) Feminism and Sexuality: A Reader, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 130–143.
14.
RitchieABarkerM (2006) ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities9(5): 584–601.
15.
RosaB (1994) Anti-monogamy: A radical challenge to compulsory heterosexuality. In: GriffinGHesterM (eds) Stirring it: Challenges for Feminism, London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 107–120.
16.
RubinGS (1993) Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: AbeloveHBaraleMAHalperinDM (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–44.
