This article explores the persistent problem of bisexual invisibility in contemporary film and television and asks why, in the rare moments bisexuality is visible, it is likely to collapse back into dominant stereotypes of bisexuals as unstable, immature and incapable of monogamy. Through a reading of You Me Her, a television series about a polyamorous triadic relationship, this article argues that bisexuality is both made evident and obscured by the dominant temporalities of monogamy. Drawing on work from scholars in critical monogamy studies and queer temporality, it therefore offers ‘mono-temporality’ as a new theoretical resource for explaining bisexual in/visibility on screen.
Anderlini-D’OnofrioS (2009) Plural happiness: Bi and poly triangulations in Balasko’s French Twist. Journal of Bisexuality9(3–4): 343–361.
2.
BarkerMLangdridgeD (2010) Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities13(6): 748–772.
3.
BerlantLWarnerM (1998) Sex in public. Critical inquiry24(2): 547–566.
4.
BlumerMLCHaymCZimmermanK, et al.(2014) What’s one got to do with it? Considering monogamous privilege. Family Therapy Magazine13(2): 28–33.
5.
Bond StocktonK (2009) The Queer Child, or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century, Series Q. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BordwellD (1986) Narration in the Fiction Film, London: Routledge.
7.
BryantWM (1997) Bisexual characters in film: from Anaïs to Zee, New York: Harrington Park Press.
8.
BryantWM (2000) Stereotyping bisexual men in film. Journal of Bisexuality1(2–3): 213–219.
9.
BudgeonS (2008) Couple culture and the production of singleness. Sexualities11(3): 301–325.
10.
ChaikenIAbbottMGreenbergK (2004–2009) The L Word, USA: Showtime.
11.
CholodenkoL (2010) The Kids Are All Right, USA: Focus Features.
12.
CobbM (2007) Lonely. South Atlantic Quarterly106(3): 445–457.
13.
DaviesRT (2006–2011) Torchwood, UK: BBC.
14.
DugganL (2003) The Twilight of Equality: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy, Boston, MA: Beacon.
15.
DuPlessisRB (2002) Endings and contradictions. In: RichardsonB (ed) Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure, and Frames, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 282–299.
16.
EadieJ (1997a) Living in the past: Savage Nights, bisexual times. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies2(1): 7–26.
17.
Eadie J (1997b) ‘That’s why she is bisexual’: Contexts for bisexual visibility. In: Bi Academic Intervention (ed.) The Bisexual Imaginary: Representation, Identity, and Desire. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 141–160.
18.
EdelmanL (2004) No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, Series Q. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
EisnerS (2013) Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution, New York: Seal Press.
20.
EmensEF (2004) Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. New York University Review of Law & Social Change29(2): 277.
21.
FinnM (2012) Monogamous order and the avoidance of chaotic excess. Psychology & Sexuality3(2): 123–136.
22.
FrecceroC (2007) Queer spectrality: Haunting the past. In: HaggertyGEMcGarryM (eds) A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 194–213.
23.
FreemanE (2010) Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
GarberMB (1995) Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life, New York: Simon & Schuster.
25.
GirardR (1965) Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure, Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
GoodmanDMWolovJ (2014–2016) Faking it, USA: MTV.
27.
GordonA (2008) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination, 2nd edn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
HalberstamJ (2005) In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives, New York and London: New York University Press.
29.
HarrisonM-C (2014) Reading the marriage plot. Journal of Family Theory & Review6(1): 112–131.
30.
HeckertJ (2010) Love without borders? Intimacy, identity and the state of compulsory monogamy. In: BarkerMLangdridgeD (eds) Understanding Non-monogamies, New York: Routledge, pp. 255–266.
31.
HemmingsC (2007) What’s in a name? Bisexuality, transnational sexuality studies and western colonial legacies. The International Journal of Human Rights11(1–2): 13–32.
32.
HidalgoDABarberKHunterE (2008) The dyadic imaginary: Troubling the perception of love as dyadic. Journal of Bisexuality7(3–4): 171–189.
33.
HooperT (2014) ‘More than two is a crowd’: Mononormativity and gross indecency in the criminal code, 1981–82. Journal of Canadian Studies/revue d’études canadiennes48(1): 53–81.
34.
IngrahamC (1994) The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory12(2): 203–219.
35.
JagoseA (2002) Inconsequence: Lesbian Representation and the Logic of Sexual Sequence, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
JohnsonHJ (2016) Bisexuality, mental health, and media representation. Journal of Bisexuality16(3): 378–396.
37.
JordanLSGroganCMuruthiB, et al.(2017) Polyamory: Experiences of power from without, from within, and in between. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy16(1): 1–19.
38.
KeanJ (2015) A stunning plurality: Unravelling hetero- and mononormativities through HBO’s Big Love. Sexualities18(5–6): 698–713.
39.
KuC-H (2010) The kid is all the rage: (Bi) sexuality, temporality and triangular desire in Leslie Marmon Silko’s Almanac of the Dead. Journal of Bisexuality10(3): 309–349.
40.
LoveH (2007) Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
41.
LovrettaM (2010–2015) Lost Girl, Canada: Showcase.
42.
MillerDA (1981) Narrative and its Discontents: Problems of Closure in the Traditional Novel, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
MintP (2004) The power dynamics of cheating: Effects on polyamory and bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality4(3–4): 55–76.
44.
Movement Advancement Project (2016) Invisible majority: The disparities facing bisexual people and how to remedy them. Colorado: Movement Advancement Project. Available at: https://www.lgbtmap.org/file/invisible-majority.pdf (accessed 7 June 2018).
45.
MuñozJE (2009) Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity, Sexual cultures. New York: New York University Press.
46.
MurrayA (1995) Forsaking all others: A bifeminist discussion of compulsory monogamy. In: TuckerNS (ed) Bisexual Politics. Theories, Queries & Visions, New York: Routledge, pp. 293–304.
47.
PetrellaS (2005) Only with you – maybe – if you make me happy. A genealogy of serial monogamy as governance and self-governance. In: BreenMSPetersF (ed) Genealogies of Identity: Interdisciplinary Readings on Sex and Sexuality, New York: Rodopi, pp. 169–183.
48.
Pieper M and Bauer R (2005) Mono-normativity and polyamory. In: International Conference on Polyamory and Mono-Normativity, University of Hamburg, 2005. Research Centre for Feminist, Gender, and Queer Studies.
49.
PorfidoG (2009) Queering the small screen: Homosexuality and televisual citizenship in spectacular societies. Sexualities12(2): 161–179.
50.
PramaggioreM (1996) Straddling the screen: Bisexual spectatorship and contemporary narrative film. In: HallDEPramaggioreM (eds) Representing Bisexualities: Subjects and Cultures of Fluid Desire, New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 272–297.
51.
PramaggioreM (2011) Kids, rock and couples: Screening the elusive/illusive bisexual. Journal of Bisexuality11(4): 587–593.
52.
RichA (1980) Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs5(4): 631–660.
53.
Roberts BC (2013) Neither fish nor fowl: Imagining bisexuality in the cinema. PhD thesis. New York University, New York.
54.
San FilippoM (2013) The B Word: Bisexuality in Contemporary Film and Television, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
55.
SaxeyE (2010) Non-monogamy and fiction. In: BarkerMLangdridgeD (eds) Understanding Non-Monogamies, New York: Routledge, pp. 23–33.
56.
Schippers M (2016) Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities. Intersections: Transdisciplinary perspectives on genders and sexualities. New York: New York University Press.
57.
SchlesingerJ (1971) Sunday Bloody Sunday, UK: United Artists.
58.
SchwartzJ (2003–2007) The O.C, USA: Fox.
59.
SedgwickEK (1990) Epistemology of the Closet, Berkeley: University of California Press.
60.
SharmanJ (1975) The Rocky Horror Picture Show, USA/UK: 20th Century Fox.
61.
ShepherdJS (2016–2018) You Me Her, Canada/USA: Audience Network.
VicariJ (2011) Male Bisexuality in Current Cinema: Images of Growth, Rebellion and Survival, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
68.
WarholR (2002) Queering the marriage plot: How serial form works in Maupin’s Tale of the City. In: RichardsonB (ed) Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure, and Frames, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 229–248.
69.
WhedonJ (1997–2003) Buffy the Vampire Slayer, USA: 20th Television.
70.
WildeJ (2015) Gay, queer, or dimensional? Modes of reading bisexuality on Torchwood. Journal of Bisexuality15(3): 414–434.
71.
WilkinsonE (2012) The romantic imaginary: Compulsory coupledom and single existence. In: HinesSTaylorY (eds) Sexualities: Past Reflections, Future Directions, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 130–145.
72.
WilleyA (2015) Constituting compulsory monogamy: Normative femininity at the limits of imagination. Journal of Gender Studies24(6): 1–13.
