Iceland is one of a few countries where the recognition of same sex relationships has been practised since the 1990s. This article is based on a mixed method study among civil partners in Iceland and explains why people choose to marry. Whilst the questionnaire data signalled that most people marry for love, love marriages were difficult to explore in the face-to-face interaction, as was the multiple understandings of security. Claiming citizenship rights, in contrast, was generally framed as marrying for the ‘right’ reasons, readily articulated by everyone involved in this study. I argue that this hesitance may partly be explained by the campaign for same sex partnership itself, which promoted security discourses rather than emotional freedom, and consequently hindered the flow of love narratives.
AllanG (2004) Being unfaithful: His and her affairs. In: DuncombeJHarrisonK (eds) The State of Affairs: Explorations in Infidelity and Commitment. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 121–140.
2.
AnderssonGNoackT (2006) The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography43(1): 79–98.
3.
Atkinson R and Flint J (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update 33. Guildford: University of Surrey. Available at: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html (accessed 29 July 2013).
4.
AuchmuthyR (2004) Same-sex marriage revived: Feminist critique and legal strategy. Feminism and Psychology14(1): 101–126.
5.
Barker M and Langdridge D (2006) Special feature on same sex marriage. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, special issue 7(2).
6.
BaumanZ (2003) Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds, Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BechH (1992) Report from a rotten state: ‘Marriage’ and ‘homosexuality’ in ‘Denmark’. In: PlummerK (ed.) Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience, London: Routledge, pp. 134–147.
8.
Beck U and Beck-Gernsheim E (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love (trans. M Ritter and J Wiebel). Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Reinventing the Family: In Search of New Lifestyles (trans. P Camiller). Oxford: Polity Press.
10.
BevacquaM (2004) Feminist theory and the question of lesbian and gay marriage. Feminism and Psychology14(1): 36–40.
11.
BrandzelAL (2005) Queering citizenship? Same-sex marriage and the state. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies11(2): 171–204.
12.
BrowneK (2011) ‘By partner we mean…’: Alternative geographies of ‘gay marriage’. Sexualities14(1): 100–122.
13.
CarpenterCGatesGJ (2008) Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California. Demography45(3): 573–590.
14.
ClarkVBurgoyneCBBurns (2006) Just a piece of paper? A qualitative exploration of same-sex couples’ multiple conceptions of civil partnership and marriage. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review7(2): 141–161.
15.
Einarsdóttir, A (2011) ‘Marriage’ and the personal life of same sex couples. In: May V (ed.) Personal life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 48–58.
16.
EinarsdóttirA (2012) Sexy subject, unflattering questions: Interviewing partners about intimacies and sex. In: PhellasN (ed.) Researching Non-heterosexual Sexualities, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 215–234.
17.
EvansM (2003) Love: An Unromantic Discussion, Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
GiddensA (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
GiddensA (2003) Intimacy as democracy. In: WeeksJHollandJWaitesM (eds) Sexualities and Society: A Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 256–264.
20.
GoodwinCButlerC (2009) Legitimate love: The meaning of civil partnership for the positioning of lesbian and gay people in society. Sexual and Relationship Therapy24(3–4): 235–248.
21.
HardingR (2011) Regulating Sexuality: Legal Consciousness in Lesbian and Gay Lives, Abingdon: Routledge.
22.
HeaphyBEinarsdóttirA (2013) Scripting civil partnerships: Interviewing couples together and apart. Qualitative Research13(1): 53–70.
23.
HeaphyBDonovanCWeeksJ (2004) A different affair? Openness and nonmonogamy in same sex relationships. In: DuncombeJHarrisonK (eds) The State of Affairs: Explorations in Infidelity and Commitment, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 167–186.
24.
HeaphyBSmartCEinarsdóttirA (2013) Same-sex marriages: New generations, new relationships, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
HeaphyBWeeksJDonovanC (1998) ‘That’s like my life’: Researching stories of non-heterosexual relationships. Sexualities1(4): 453–470.
26.
HoltM (2004) ‘Marriage-like’ or married? Lesbian and gay marriage, partnership and migration. Feminism and Psychology14(1): 30–35.
27.
JamiesonL (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
JamiesonL (1999) Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociology33(3): 477–494.
29.
JamiesonL (2003) The couple: Intimate and equal? In: WeeksJHollandJWaitesM (eds) Sexualities and Society: A Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 265–276.
30.
JamiesonL (2004) Intimacy, negotiated nonmonogamy, and the limits of the couple. In: DuncombeJHarrisonK (eds) The State of Affairs: Explorations in Infidelity and Commitment, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 35–58.
31.
LewinE (2001) Weddings without marriage: Making sense of lesbian and gay commitment rituals. In: BernsteinMReimannR (eds) Queer Families, Queer Politics: Challenging Culture and the State, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 44–52.
32.
LewinE (2004) Anxiety at the altar: Some comments on same-sex marriage from the United States. Feminism and Psychology14(2): 323–326.
33.
LewisJ (2001) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
34.
LiddleKLiddleBJ (2004) In the meantime: Same-sex ceremonies in the absence of legal recognition. Feminism and Psychology14(1): 52–56.
35.
Lög um staðfesta samvist nr. 87/1996 [Act on Civil Partnership no 87/1996].
36.
MerinY (2002) Equality for Same-Sex Couples: The Legal Recognition of Gay Partnerships in Europe and the United States, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
National Registry (2007) Register of Persons. Available at: http://www.thjodskra.is/en (accessed 18 January 2007).
38.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
39.
PhelanS (2001) Sexual Strangers: Gays, Lesbians and Dilemmas of Citizenship, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
40.
PlummerK (1995) Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change and Social Worlds, London: Routledge.
RolfeAPeelE (2011) ‘It’s a double-edged thing’: The paradox of civil partnership and why some couples are choosing not to have one. Feminism and Psychology21(3): 317–335.
43.
RothblumED (2005) Same-sex marriage and legalized relationships: I do, or do I?Journal of GLBT Family Studies1(1): 21–31.
44.
RothblumEDBalsamKFSolomonSE (2011) Narratives of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont: The impact of legalizing relationships on couples and social policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy8: 183–191.
45.
Shipman B and Smart C (2007) ‘It’s made a huge difference’: Recognition, rights and the personal significance of civil partnership. Sociological Research Online 12(1).Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/1/shipman.html (accessed 7 May 2007).
46.
ShulmanJLGottaGGreenR-J (2012) Will marriage matter? Effects of marriage anticipated by same sex couples. Journal of Family Issues33(2): 158–181.
47.
SmartC (2005) Textures of family life: Further thoughts on change and commitment. Journal of Social Policy34(4): 541–556.
48.
SmartC (2007) Same sex couples and marriage: Negotiating relational landscapes with families and friends. The Sociological Review55(4): 671–686.
49.
SmartC (2008) ‘Can I be bridesmaid?’ Combining the personal and political in same-sex weddings. Sexualities11(6): 761–776.
50.
SmartCShipmanB (2004) Visions in monochrome: Families, marriage and the individualization thesis. The British Journal of Sociology55(4): 491–510.
51.
SmithM (2010) Gender politics and the same-sex marriage debate in the United States. Social Politics17(1): 1–28.
52.
SolomonSERothblumEDBalsamKF (2004) Pioneers in partnership: Lesbian and gay male couples in civil unions compared with those not in civil onions and married heterosexual siblings. Journal of Family Psychology18(2): 275–286.
53.
StoddardTB (1997 [1989]) Why gay people should seek the right to marry: From Out/Look (1989). In: BlasiusMPhelanS (eds) We are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 753–757.
54.
Sullivan A (ed.) (2004) Same-Sex Marriage. Pro and Con: A Reader (revised edn). New York: Vintage Books.
