Addressing heteronormativity: Gendered familial appellations as an issue in the same-sex marriage debate in Taiwan

Abstract

On 24 May 2017, a historical landmark for the LGBT movement was achieved in Taiwan. The courts delivered Interpretation no. 748, which declares that the legal regulation in the Civil Code disallowing two individuals of the same sex to marry is unconstitutional and that the law should therefore be amended within two years. While the legal arguments at the constitutional level seem settled, discussions regarding sexuality, family and tradition triggered by the debate about same-sex marriage are continuing. Drawing on feminist and queer scholarship, I advocate turning the spotlight from the ‘subversive’ homosexual to ‘normative’ heterosexuality. In addition, through the theoretical lens of interactionism on sexuality, this study investigates a quotidian but controversial topic emerging in the debate: gendered familial appellations. Using transcripts of public hearings as research data, I discuss how the practice of employing gendered familial appellations based on the idea of the heterosexual family becomes an issue in the debate. Through an analysis of the matter, I argue that the heteronormative social order embedded in everyday interactions within the context of Taiwan society is revealed. This heteronormativity is not only gendered and hierarchically heterosexual but also ethnocentric in nature.

Keywords

Familial appellation gender heteronormativity same-sex marriage Taiwan

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachmann

(2011) Civil partnership–‘gay marriage in all but name’: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK Parliament. Corpora 6(1): 77–105.

Blumer

(1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Borrillo

(2005) Who is breaking with tradition? The legal recognition of same-sex partnership in France and the question of modernity. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 17(1): 89–97.

Brainer

(2018) New identities or new intimacies? Rethinking ‘coming out’ in Taiwan through cross-generational ethnography. Sexualities 21(5–6): 914–931.

Brown

(2004) Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities, London: University of California Press.

Cheng

Adamczyk

(2017) Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012. Chinese Sociological Review 48(4): 317–345.

Chin

(2018) Everyday Gender at Work in Taiwan, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Coolidge

(1998) Playing the loving card: Same-sex marriage and the politics of analogy. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 12(2): 201–238.

Denes

Afifi

(2014) Coming out again: Exploring GLBQ individuals’ communication with their parents after the first coming out. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 10(3): 298–325.

10.

Einarsdóttir

(2013) ‘They married for love but keep it quiet’: Same-sex partners in Iceland. Sexualities 16(7): 788–806.

11.

Erni

(2014) Marriage rights for transgender people in Hong Kong. In: Davis

Friedman

(eds) Wives, Husbands, and Lovers: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 191–218.

12.

Fang B (2017) ‘To amend Civil Code would definitely undermine social order’, Chiu Tai-San: would it be daughter-in-law or son-in law? It would impact the mid and southern part of Taiwan greatly [「修民法一定衝擊社會秩序」邱太三：是媳婦還女婿？對中南部衝擊很大]. The Storm Media [風傳媒], 24 March. Available at: http://www.storm.mg/article/238233 (accessed 15 February 2018).

13.

Focus Taiwan (2018) The 10 referendum questions Taiwanese are voting on, Focus Taiwan 24 November. Available at: http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201811240010.aspx (accessed 18 April 2019).

14.

Friedman

(2017) Stranger anxiety: Failed legal equivalences and the challenges of intimate recognition in Taiwan. Public Culture 29(3(83)): 433–455.

15.

Fuss

(1991) Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories, New York: Routledge.

16.

Gagnon

Simon

(1974) Sexual Conduct, London: Hutchinson.

17.

Griffith

Hebl

(2002) The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: ‘coming out’ at work. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(6): 1191–1199.

18.

Haider-Markel

(2010) Out and Running: Gay and Lesbian Candidates, Elections, and Policy Representation, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

19.

Harton C (2018) Taiwan asked voters 10 questions. It got some unexpected answers. The New York Times, 26 November. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/26/world/asia/taiwan-election.html (accessed 30 December 2018).

20.

Hekma

(2002) Imams and homosexuality: A post-gay debate in the Netherlands. Sexualities 5(2): 237–248.

21.

Herek

(1999) AIDS and Stigma. American Behavioral Scientist 42(7): 1106–1116.

22.

Hioe B (2017) The first Asian ‘country’, ‘place’, or ‘Chinese province’ to realize marriage equality? New Bloom, 26 May. Available at: https://newbloommag.net/2017/05/26/taiwan-gay-marriage-coverage/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

23.

Holms

(2009) Gender and Everyday Life, London: Routledge.

24.

Hsiau

(1997) Language ideology in Taiwan: The KMT’s language policy, the Tai-yu language movement, and ethnic politics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 18(4): 302–315.

25.

Hsu

VHW

(2015) Colors of rainbow, shades of family: The road to marriage equality and democratization of intimacy in Taiwan. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 16(2): 154–165.

26.

Huang

HTM

(2011) Queer Politics and Sexual Modernity in Taiwan, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

27.

Ingraham

(1994) The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory 12(2): 203–219.

28.

Jackson

(1999) Heterosexuality in Question, London: SAGE.

29.

Jackson

(2006) Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory 7(1): 105–121.

30.

Jackson

Scott

(2010a) Theorizing Sexuality, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

31.

Jackson

Scott

(2010b) Rehabilitating interactionism for a feminist sociology of sexuality. Sociology 44(5): 811–826.

32.

Kandaswamy

(2008) State austerity and the racial politics of same-sex marriage in the US. Sexualities 11(6): 706–725.

33.

Kantsa

(2014) The price of marriage: Same-sex sexualities and citizenship in Greece. Sexualities 17(7): 818–836.

34.

Kessler

McKenna

(1978) Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach, London: University of Chicago Press.

35.

Kohler

(2005) Narrative analysis. In: Kelly

Horrocks

Milnes

, et al.(eds) Narrative, Memory & Everyday Life, Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield, pp. 1–7.

36.

Kuo L (2019) Taiwan becomes the first in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage. The Guardian, 17 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/17/taiwan-becomes-first-asian-county-to-legalise-same-sex-marriage (accessed 16 August 2019).

37.

Lawrence

Husfeldt

Kelly

, et al.(1990) The stigma of AIDS: Fear of disease and prejudice toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality 19(3): 85–102.

38.

Lee

(2017) Queer activism in Taiwan: An emergent rainbow coalition from the assemblage perspective. The Sociological Review 65(4): 682–698.

39.

Lee Y (2019) Taiwan unveils Asia’s first draft law on same-sex marriage. Reuters, 21 February. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-taiwan-lgbt/taiwan-unveils-asias-first-draft-law-on-same-sex-marriage-idUSKCN1QA0I2 (accessed 15 April 2019).

40.

McIntosh

(1968) The homosexual role. Social Problems 16(2): 182–192.

41.

Nicol

Smith

(2008) Legal struggles and political resistance: Same-sex marriage in Canada and the USA. Sexualities 11(6): 667–687.

42.

Oliver

Serovich

Mason

(2005) Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces 84(2): 1273–1289.

43.

Orne

(2011) ‘You will always have to “out” yourself’: Reconsidering coming out through strategic outness. Sexualities 14(6): 681–703.

44.

Patton

(1994) Last Served? Gendering the HIV Pandemic, London: Taylor & Francis.

45.

Pichardo

(2011) We are family (or not): Social and legal recognition of same-sex relationships and lesbian and gay families in Spain. Sexualities 14(5): 544–561.

46.

Platero

(2007) Love and the state: Gay marriage in Spain. Feminist Legal Studies 15(3): 329–340.

47.

Radbord

(2005) Lesbian love stories: How we won equal marriage in Canada. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 17(1): 99.

48.

Rahman

Jackson

(2000) Gender & Sexuality: Sociological Approaches, Cambridge: Polity Press.

49.

Ratele

(2016) Contesting ‘traditional’ masculinity and men’s sexuality in Kwadukuza South Africa. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 108(3): 331–344.

50.

Rauhala E (2017) A backlash against same-sex marriage tests Taiwan’s reputation for gay rights. The Washington Post, 20 April. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/a-backlash-against-same-sex-marriage-tests-taiwans-reputation-for-gay-rights/2017/04/19/f855c8b8-2004-11e7-bcd6-6d1286bc177d_story.html?utm_term=.fb841e33a46d (accessed 15 February 2018).

51.

Reid G (2018) Taiwan referendum threatens same-sex marriage. Human Rights Watch, 10 October. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/10/10/taiwan-referendum-threatens-same-sex-marriage (accessed 30 October 2018).

52.

Reygan

Lynette

(2014) Heteronormativity, homophobia and ‘culture’ arguments in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Sexualities 17(5–6): 707–723.

53.

Rich

(1980) Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5(4): 631–660.

54.

Rich

(2016) Electoral paths and support for same-sex marriage legislation: Evidence from Taiwan’s mixed-member system. International Political Science Review 38(5): 1–14.

55.

Richardson

(1996) Theorising Heterosexuality: Telling it Straight, Buckingham: Open University Press.

56.

Sandel

(2003) Linguistic capital in Taiwan: The KMT’s Mandarin language policy and its perceived impact on language practices of bilingual Mandarin and Tai-gi speakers. Language in Society 32(4): 523–551.

57.

Scott

Theron

(2017) The promise of heteronormativity: Marriage as a strategy for respectability in South Africa. Sexualities 22(3): 436–451. DOI: 10.1177/1363460717713384.

58.

Seidman

(1997) Difference Troubles: Queering Social Theory and Sexual Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Seidman

(2005) From polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In: Ingraham

(ed) Thinking Straight: New Work in Critical Heterosexuality Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 39–62.

60.

Sherkat

(2017) Intersecting identities and support for same-sex marriage in the United States. Social Currents 4(4): 380–400.

61.

Simon

Gagnon

(1986) Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior 15(2): 97–120.

62.

Smith

(2000) Content analysis and narrative analysis. In: Reis

Judd

(eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–335.

63.

Smith N (2017) Taiwan’s same-sex ruling could cement its place as Asia’s liberal beacon. The Guardian, 22 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/22/taiwans-same-sex-marriage-court-ruling-asias-liberal-beacon (accessed 14 February 2018).

64.

Steger I (2018) How Taiwan battled fake anti-LGBT news before its vote on same-sex marriage. QUARTZ, 22 November. Available at: https://qz.com/1471411/chat-apps-like-line-spread-anti-lgbt-fake-news-before-taiwan-same-sex-marriage-vote/ (accessed 15 April 2019).

65.

Van der Toorn

Jost

Packer

, et al.(2017) In defense of tradition: Religiosity, conservatism, and opposition to same-sex marriage in North America. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43(10): 1455–1468.

66.

Veigh

Diaz

(2009) Voting to ban same-sex marriage: Interests, values, and communities. American Sociological Review 74(6): 891–915.

67.

Wang

Bih

Brennan

(2009) Have they really come out: Gay men and their parents in Taiwan. Culture, Health & Sexuality 11(3): 285–296.

68.

Wang, HT (2006) Feminism and Family Law in Taiwan: The change of matrimonial property law as example [台灣親屬法的女性主義法學發展–-以夫妻財產制為例], National Chung Cheng University Law Journal [國立中正大學法學集刊] 21: 1–36.

69.

West

Zimmerman

(1987) Doing gender. Gender & Society 1(2): 125–151.

70.

Yeh

(2017) Good words hurt too: The cyberdiscourse against same-sex marriage in Taiwan. Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology 86: 69–110.

71.

Young

(2006) Same-sex marriage and the Christian Churches in Canada. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 35(1): 1–23.