Influences of organizational features of healthcare settings on clinical decision making: Qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2012
Influences of organizational features of healthcare settings on clinical decision making: Qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment
A proliferating literature documents cross-national variation in medical practice and seeks to explain observed differences in terms of the presence of certain kinds of healthcare systems, economic, and cultural differences between countries. Less is known about how providers themselves understand these influences and perceive them as relevant to their clinical work. Using qualitative data from a cross-national factorial experiment in the United States and United Kingdom, we analyze 244 primary care physicians’ explanations of how organizational features of their respective healthcare settings influence the treatment decisions they made for a vignette patient, including affordability of care; within-system quality deficits; and constraints due to patient behavior. While many differences are attributed to financial constraints deriving from two very differently structured healthcare systems, in other ways they are reflections of cultural and historical expectations regarding medical care, or interactions between the two. Implications, including possible challenges to the implementation of universal care in the USA, are discussed.
BatesMSRankin-HillLSanchez-AyendezM (1997) The Effects of the Cultural Context of Health Care on Treatment of and Response to Chronic Pain and Illness. Social Science and Medicine45(9): 1433–1447.
2.
BeckfieldJ (2004) Does Income Inequality Harm Health? New Cross-National Evidence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior45(3): 231–248.
3.
DresselhausTRPeabodyJWLeeMWangMMLuckJ (2000) Measuring Compliance with Preventive Care Guidelines: Standardized Patients, Clinical Vignettes, and the Medical Record. Journal of General Internal Medicine15(11): 782–788.
4.
EganTJayeC (2009) Communities of Clinical Practice: The Social Organization of Clinical Learning. health: 13(1): 107–125.
5.
GabbayJLe MayAJeffersonH. (2003) A Case Study of Knowledge Management in Multi-Agency Consumer-Informed ‘Communities of Practice’: Implications for Evidence-Based Policy Development in Health and Social Services. health: 7(3): 283–310.
6.
GosdenTForlandFKristiansenIS. (2001) Impact of Payment Method on Behaviour of Primary Care Physicians: A Systematic Review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy6(1): 44–55.
7.
KimDKawachiIHoornSVEzzatiM (2008) Is Inequality at the Heart of It? Cross-Country Associations of Income Inequality with Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors. Social Science and Medicine66(8): 1719–1732.
8.
KramerJMNewbyLKChangWC. (2003) International Variation in the Use of Evidence-Based Medicines for Acute Coronary Syndromes. European Heart Journal24(23): 2133–2141.
9.
LutfeyK (2003) The Influence of Clinic Organizational Features on Providers’ Assessments of Patient Compliance with Medical Treatment Regimens. Research in the Sociology of Health Care21: 63–83.
10.
LutfeyKFreeseJ (2005) Toward Some Fundamentals of Fundamental Causality: Socioeconomic Status and Health in the Routine Clinic Visit for Diabetes. American Journal of Sociology110(5): 1326–1372.
11.
LutfeyKECampbellSMRenfrewMRMarceauLDRolandMMcKinlayJB (2008) How Are Patient Characteristics Relevant for Physicians’ Clinical Decision Making in Diabetes? An Analysis of Qualitative Results from a Cross-National Factorial Experiment. Social Science and Medicine67(9): 1391–1399.
12.
MaiseySSteelNMarshRGillamSFleetcroftRHoweA (2008) Effects of Payment for Performance in Primary Care: Qualitative Interview Study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy13(3): 133–139.
13.
McKinlayJLinkCArberS. (2006) How Do Doctors in Different Countries Manage the Same Patient? Results of a Factorial Experiment. Health Services Research41(6): 2182–2200. (Erratum in 2141(2186): 2303.)
14.
McKinlayJBMarceauLD (2002) The End of the Golden Age of Doctoring. International Journal of Health Services Research32(2): 379–416.
15.
MechanicD (2002) Improving the Quality of Health Care in the United States of America: The Need for a Multi-Level Approach. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy7(Suppl. 1): 35–39.
16.
MundingerMOThomasESmolowitzJHonigJ (2004) Essential Health Care: Affordable for All?Nursing Economics22(5): 239–244, 227.
17.
OlafsdottirS (2007) Fundamental Causes of Health Disparities: Stratification, the Welfare State, and Health in the United States and Iceland. Journal of Health and Social Behavior48(3): 239–253.
18.
PayerL (1988) Medicine and Culture: Varieties of Treatment in the United States, England, West Germany, and France. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
19.
PeabodyJWLuckJGlassmanPDresselhausTRLeeM (2000) Comparison of Vignettes, Standardized Patients, and Chart Abstraction: A Prospective Validation Study of 3 Methods for Measuring Quality. Journal of the American Medical Association283(13): 1715–1722.
20.
QuadagnoJ (2004) Why the United States Has No National Health Insurance: Stakeholder Mobilization Against the Welfare State, 1945–1996. Journal of Health and Social Behavior45(Suppl.): 25–44.
21.
SarpelUVladeckBCDivinoCMKlotmanPE (2008) Fact and Fiction: Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System. Annals of Surgery247(4): 563–569.
22.
ShackeltonRLinkCLMarceauLMcKinlayJ (2009) Does the Culture of Medical Practice Affect the Clinical Management of Diabetes by Primary Care Providers?Journal of Health Services Research and Policy14(2): 96–103.
23.
SiegristJShackeltonRLinkC. (2010) Work Stress of Primary Care Physicians in the US, UK and German Health Care Systems. Social Science and Medicine71(2): 298–304.
24.
SirovichBGallagherPMWennbergDEFisherES (2008) Discretionary Decision Making by Primary Care Physicians and the Cost of U.S. Health Care. Health Affairs (Millwood)27(3): 813–823.
25.
StevensR (1995) The Evolution of Healthcare Systems in the United States and the United Kingdom: Similarities and Differences. In: DaveyBGreyBSealeC (eds) Health and Disease: A Reader. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press, 319–325.
26.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
27.
StrumpfECCubanskiJ (2005) Options for Federal Coverage of the Uninsured in 2005. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) (831): 1–12.
28.
VeloskiJTaiSEvansASNashDB (2005) Clinical Vignette-Based Surveys: A Tool for Assessing Physician Practice Variation. American Journal of Medical Quality20(3): 151–157.
29.
WaringJJ (2007) Doctors’ Thinking about ‘the System’ as a Threat to Patient Safety. health: 11(1): 29–46.
30.
WeiszDGusmanoMKRodwinVG (2004) Gender and the Treatment of Heart Disease in Older Persons in the United States, France, and England: A Comparative, Population-Based View of a Clinical Phenomenon. Gender Medicine1(1): 29–40.
