The terms non-compliance or non-adherence, in relation to medicine taking, contain the assumption that prescribers’ actions are legitimate and should be perceived as such by patients, and that non-adherence is deviant. Yet the high level of non-adherence suggests that patients do not necessarily perceive prescriptions in this way. We consider the relevance today of viewing non-adherence in terms of Weber’s concept of legitimacy. We also consider the more recent concept of concordance. Drawing on an analysis of interviews and consultations from a study of doctor–patient communication about drugs, we argue that decisions about prescribing and medicine taking are complex and take account of social as well as medical criteria. Moreover, any attempt to understand adherence needs to be flexible enough to encompass both a Weberian as well as a concordance approach to prescribing and medicine taking.
Barry, C.A. , Bradley, C.P., Britten, N., Stevenson, F.A. and Barber, N. (2000). Patients’ unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations. British Medical Journal, 320, 1246–1250.
2.
Barry, C.A. , Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C. and Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimise teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26–44.
3.
Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan.
4.
Bradley, C.P. (1992). Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: A critical incident study. British Medical Journal, 304, 294–296.
5.
Britten, N. and Ukoumunne, O. (1997). The influence of patients’ hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors’ perceptions and the decision to prescribe: A questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 315, 1506–1510.
6.
Britten, N. , Stevenson, F.A., Barry, C.A., Barber, N. and Bradley, C.P. (2000). Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 320, 484–488.
7.
Cartwright, A. , Lucas, S. and O’Brien, M. (1976). Some methodological problems studying consultations in general practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 26, 894–906.
8.
Charles, C. , Gafni, A. and Whelan, T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 651–661.
9.
Cockburn, J. and Pit, S. (1997). Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: Patients’ expectations and doctors’ perceptions of patients’ expectations – a questionnaire study. British Medical Journal, 315, 520–523.
10.
Coulter, A. (1997). Partnership with patients: The pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2, 112–121.
11.
Donovan, J.L. (1995). Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in compliance research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 11, 443–455.
12.
Donovan, J.L. and Blake, D.R. (1992). Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision making?Social Science & Medicine, 34, 507–513.
13.
Etzioni, A. (1961a). Complex organizations. A sociological reader. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
Etzioni, A. (1961b). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. London: Collier-Macmillan Limited.
15.
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Freund, J. (1968). The sociology of Max Weber. London: Penguin Press.
17.
Greenfield, S. , Kaplan, S. and Ware, J.E. (1985) Expanding patient involvement in care: Effects on patient outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine, 102, 520–528.
18.
Guadagnoli, E. and Ward, P. (1998). Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 329–339.
19.
Hall, D. (1980). Prescribing as a social exchange. In R. Mapes (Ed.), Prescribing practice and drug usage. London: Croom Helm.
20.
Haug, M. (1973). Deprofessionalisation: An alternative hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 195–211.
21.
Haynes, R.B. , McKibbon, K.A. and Kanani, R. (1996). Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patient to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet, 348, 383–386.
22.
Iphofen, R. and Poland, F. (1998). Sociology in practice for health care professionals. London: Macmillan.
23.
Morrison, K. (1995). Marx, Durkheim, Weber. Formations of modern social thought. London: Sage.
24.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB). (1997). From compliance to concordance: Toward shared goals in medicine taking. London: RPSGB.
25.
Stevenson, F.A. , Barry, C.A., Britten, N., Barber, N. and Bradley, C.P. (2000a). Doctor–patient communication about drugs: The evidence for shared decision making. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 829–840.
26.
Stevenson, F.A. , Britten, N., Barry, C.A., Barber, N. and Bradley, C.P. (2000b). Research notes: Qualitative methods and prescribing research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 25, 317–324.
27.
The NHS Plan . A plan for investment. (2000). London: Stationery Office.
28.
Van der Geest, S. , Whyte, S.R. and Hardon, A. (1996). The anthropology of pharmaceuticals: A biographical approach. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 153–178.
29.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. London: Collier Macmillan.
30.
Weber, M. (1991). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge.
31.
Wright, E.C. (1993). Non-compliance – or how many aunts has Matilda?Lancet, 342, 909–913.
