Scholars have theorized “criminalized masculinity” as performances of criminalized men. We refigure the concept to identify narratives that facilitate and legitimize control of criminalized populations. Drawing on 109 California parole hearings, we show how parole commissioners use logics of deserving and dangerous masculinity to assert a boundary between men deemed ready for social reintegration and men relegated to captivity. Commissioners articulate criminalized masculinity along three dimensions: relationship to self; relationship to male peers; and relationship to subordinate others like women and children. These gender logics are materially significant because they justify parole grants and denials. Symbolically, narratives of masculinity legitimize the prison’s work of racialized social exclusion and obscure structural dynamics of punishment under accounts of individual difference.
AnwarSFangH (2015) Testing for racial prejudice in the parole board release process. Journal of Legal Studies44(1): 1–37.
4.
BlommaertJBulcaenC (2000) Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology29: 447–466.
5.
Bonilla-SilvaE (2019) Feeling race: Theorizing the racial economy of emotions. American Sociological Review84(1): 1–25.
6.
BradleyMEngenR (2016) Leaving prison: A multilevel investigation of racial, ethnic, and gender disproportionality in correctional release. Crime & Delinquency62(2): 253–279.
7.
BurnsRKinkadePLeoneMC, et al. (1999) Perspectives on parole: The board members’ viewpoint. Federal Probation63(1): 26–22.
8.
CaplanJ (2010) Parole release decisions: Impact of victim input on a representative sample of inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 291–300.
9.
CarlsonJ (2018) Legally armed but presumed dangerous: An intersectional analysis of gun carry licensing as a racial/gender degradation ceremony. Gender & Society32(2): 204–227.
10.
CollierR (1998) Masculinities, Crime, and Criminology: Men, Heterosexuality, and the Criminal(ised) Other. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
11.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
12.
ConnellRW (2005) The social organization of masculinity. In: Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 67–86.
13.
ConnellRWMesserschmidtJ (2005) Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society19(6): 829–859.
14.
ConnorDP (2016) How to get out of prison: Views from parole board members. Corrections1(2): 107–126.
15.
DavisAY (1983) Women, Race, & Class. New York: Vintage Books Random House.
16.
D’EmilioJFreedmanEB (2013) Since intimate matters: Recent developments in the history of sexuality in the United States. Journal of Women’s History25(4): 88–100.
17.
DowDM (2016) The deadly challenges of raising African American boys: Navigating the controlling image of the “thug”. Gender & Society30(2): 161–188.
18.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity.
19.
FoxKJ (1999) Changing violent minds: Discursive correction and resistance in the cognitive treatment of violent offenders in prison. Social Problems46(1): 88–103.
20.
GarlandD (1991) Punishment and culture: The symbolic dimension of criminal justice. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society11: 191–222.
21.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GerschickTJMillerAS (1995) Coming to terms: Masculinity and physical disability. In: SaboDGordonDF (eds) Men’s Health and Illness: Gender, Power, and the Body. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 183–204.
23.
GlaserBGStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
24.
GlennEN (2002) Unequal Freedom: How Race and Gender Shaped American Citizenship and Labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Hannah-MoffatK (2004) Losing ground: Gendered knowledges, parole risk, and responsibility. Social Politics11(3): 363–385.
26.
Hannah-MoffatKYuleC (2011) Gaining insight, changing attitudes and managing “risk”: Parole release decisions for women convicted of violent crimes. Punishment & Society13(2): 149–175.
27.
HernándezKL (2014) Hobos in heaven. Pacific Historical Review83(3): 410–447.
HochschildAR (1979) Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology85(3): 551–575.
30.
Hua-FuH (2005) The patterns of masculinity in prison. Critical Criminology13(1): 1–16.
31.
HuebnerBBynumT (2008) The role of race and ethnicity in parole decisions. Criminology46(4): 907–938.
32.
JennessVFenstermakerS (2016) Forty years after Brownmiller: Prisons for men, transgender inmates, and the rape of the feminine. Gender & Society30(1): 14–29.
33.
JewkesY (2016) Men behind bars: “Doing” masculinity as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men and Masculinities8(1): 44–63.
34.
KangM (2003) The managed hand: The commercialization of bodies and emotions in Korean immigrant-owned nail salons. Gender and Society17(6): 820–839.
KerrisonEM (2018) Risky business, risk assessment, and other heteronormative misnomers in women’s community corrections and reentry planning. Punishment & Society20(1): 134–151.
37.
KilgoreJ (2015) Understanding Mass Incarceration: A People’s Guide to the Key Civil Rights Struggle of Our Time. New York: The New Press.
38.
KochelTRWilsonDBMastrofskiSD (2011) Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology49(2): 473–512.
39.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
40.
LivelyKJ (2000) Reciprocal emotion management: Working together to maintain stratification in private law firms. Work and Occupations27(1): 32–63.
41.
McCorkelJ (2004) Criminally dependent? Gender, punishment, and the rhetoric of welfare reform. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society11(3): 386–410.
MesserschmidtJ (1993) Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
44.
MetzlJ (2009) The Protest Psychosis: How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
45.
MillsS (1997) Discourse. Florence, KY: Routledge.
46.
MorganKDSmithB (2008) The impact of race on parole decision-making. Justice Quarterly25(2): 411–435.
47.
MunizA (2014) Maintaining racial boundaries: Criminalization, neighborhood context, and the origins of gang injunctions. Social Problems61(2): 216–236.
48.
NandiM (2002) Re/constructing Black masculinity in prison. Journal of Men’s Studies11(1): 91–107.
49.
National Research Council (2014) The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Ed. TravisJWesternBRedburnS. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
50.
NewtonC (1994) Gender theory and prison sociology: Using theories of masculinities to interpret the sociology of prisons for men. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice33(3): 193–202.
51.
O’MalleyP (1996) Risk and responsibility. In: BarryAOsborneTRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
PaparozziMACaplanJM (2009) A profile of paroling authorities in America: The strange bedfellows of politics and professionalism. The Prison Journal89(4): 401–425.
53.
PennerAMSapersteinA (2015) Disentangling the effects of racial self-identification and classification by others: The case of arrest. Demography52(3): 1017–1024.
54.
PierceJ (1995) Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
55.
PollackS (2007) “I’m just not good in relationships”: Victimization discourses and the gendered regulation of criminalized women. Feminist Criminology2(2): 158–174.
56.
ReitzKRRhineEE (2020) Parole release and supervision: Critical drivers of American prison policy. Annual Review of Criminology3: 281–298.
57.
RicciardelliRMaierKHannah-MoffatK (2015) Strategic masculinities: Vulnerabilities, risk and the production of prison masculinities. Theoretical Criminology19(4): 491–513.
58.
RiosVM (2017) Human Targets: Schools, Police, and the Criminalization of Latino Youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
RitchieA (2017) Invisible No More: Police Violence against Black Women and Women of Color. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
60.
RoedigerD (1991) The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. New York: Verso.
61.
RothWD (2010) Racial mismatch: The divergence between form and function in data for monitoring racial discrimination of Hispanics. Social Science Quarterly91(5): 1288–1311.
62.
RyanGWBernardHR (2003) Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods15(1): 85–109.
63.
SaboDFKupersTALondonWJ (2001) Prison Masculinities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
64.
ShammasVL (2019) The perils of parole hearings: California lifers, performative disadvantage, and the ideology of insight. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review42(1): 142–160.
65.
SilversteinM (2006) Justice in genderland: Through a parole looking glass. Symbolic Interaction29(3): 393–410.
66.
StuartFBenezraA (2018) Criminalized masculinities: How policing shapes the construction of gender and sexuality in poor Black communities. Social Problems65(2): 174–190.
67.
Van Zyl SmitDCordaA (2018) American exceptionalism in parole release and supervision: A European perspective. In: ReitzKR (ed.) American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
WacquantL (2001) Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society3(1): 95–133.
69.
WaldramJB (2012) Hound Pound Narrative: Sexual Offender Habilitation and the Anthropology of Therapeutic Intervention. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
70.
WattleyK (2013) Insight into California’s life sentences. Federal Sentencing Reporter25(4): 1–5.
WeisbergRMukamalDASegallJD (2011) Life in limbo: An examination of parole release for prisoners serving life sentences with the possibility of parole in California. Stanford, CA: Stanford Criminal Justice Center.
73.
WellsIB (1996) Southern Horrors and Other Writings: The Anti-Lynching Campaign of Ida B. Wells, 1892–1900. Ed. Royster JJ. Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin’s.
74.
WesternB (2018) Homeward: Life in the year after prison. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
WingfieldAH (2010) Are some emotions marked “whites only”? Racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Social Problems57(2): 251–268.
77.
WyseJJB (2013) Rehabilitating criminal selves: Gendered strategies in community corrections. Gender & Society27(2): 231–255.
78.
YoungIM (2003) The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society29(1): 1–25.
79.
YoungKMukamalDFavre-BulleT (2016) Predicting parole grants: An analysis of suitability hearings for California’s lifer inmates. Federal Sentencing Reporter28(4): 268–277.
