Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines demand for guns for personal protection in the USA, South Africa, and India. To make sense of pro-gun sentiment across these different contexts, I argue that gun owners and carriers who arm themselves for personal protection represent a particular kind of ‘responsibilized’ subject. Drawing on Foucault’s analysis of sovereign power and governmentality, I develop a theory of the ‘sovereign subject’. This is a political rationality marked by private individuals’ capacity and desire to perform sovereign functions that the state has typically monopolized, specifically the exercise of legitimate, lethal violence. I conclude the article by suggesting four characteristics (historically precarious state monopoly on sovereign power; legality of civilian use of guns; preponderance of criminal guns; and US influence) that may encourage demand for guns in high-crime societies.

Keywords

Foucault guns police and policing responsibilization self-defense

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agamben

(1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Agence France Presse (2013a) In India’s ‘rape capital’ Delhi, women turn to self-defense. 4 January. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/india-rape-capital-delhi-self-defense_n_2406866.html (accessed 28 February 2013).

Agence France Presse (2013b) Pistorius case puts S. African police in the dock. 20 February. Available at: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130220/pistorius-case-puts-safrican-police-the-dock (accessed 28 February 2013).

BBC (2004) S Africa moves to curb gun violence. 1 July. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3857163.stm (accessed 28 February 2013).

Bhan

(2009) ‘This is no longer the city I once knew’: Evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environment and Urbanization 21(1): 127–142.

Burke

(2012) Indian women turn to firearms against threat of violence. 21 May. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/21/indian-women-take-up-firearms (accessed 5 January 2013).

Carlson

(2012) ‘I don’t dial 911!’: American guns and the problem of policing. British Journal of Criminology 52(6): 1113–1132.

Comaroff

(2006) Law and disorder in the postcolony: An introduction. In: Comaroff

Comaroff

(eds) Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–56.

De Greef

(2000) The role of NGO’s in the control of light weapons: A case study of the South African Gunowners’ Association. In: Gamba

(ed.) Society under Siege. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 227–253.

10.

Dubber

(2005) The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government. New York: Columbia University Press.

11.

Durkheim

(1997) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.

12.

Ewick

Silbey

(1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Fantz

(2013) Pistorius case brings South Africa gun culture to global spotlight. 25 February. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/23/world/africa/south-africa-gun-violence/index.html (accessed 28 February 2013).

14.

Foucault

(1995) Discipline & Punish. New York: Random House.

15.

Foucault

(2009) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978. New York: Picador.

16.

Foucault

(2010) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. New York: Picador.

17.

Francescani

(2012) George Zimmerman: A prelude to a shooting. 25 April. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/25/us-usa-florida-shooting-zimmerman-idUSBRE83O18H20120425 (accessed 5 January 2013).

18.

Garland

(1996) The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology 36(4): 445–471.

19.

Garland

(1997) ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime. Theoretical Criminology 1(2): 173–214.

20.

Garland

(2000) The culture of high crime societies. British Journal of Criminology 40(3): 347–375.

21.

Garland

(2002) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Ghertner

(2011) Gentrifying the state, gentrifying participation: Elite governance programs in Delhi. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(3): 504–532.

23.

Ghosh

(2013) Delhi gang-rape: Indian women stocking up on guns for protection. 6 January. Available at: http://www.ibtimes.com/delhi-gang-rape-indian-women-stocking-guns-protection-995330 (accessed 28 February 2013).

24.

Goold

Loader

Thumala

(2011) Consuming security? Tools for a sociology of security consumption. Theoretical Criminology 14(1): 3–30.

25.

Goss

(2008) Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

26.

Gupta

(2012) Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

27.

Habermas

(1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Spehre. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

28.

Hansen

(2009) Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 169–191.

29.

Harris

(1999) The stories, the statistics, and the law: Why ‘driving while black’ matters. Minnesota Law Review 94: 265–326.

30.

Harvey

(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Kahan

Braman

(2003) More statistics, less persuasion: A cultural theory of gun-risk perceptions. University of Pennsylvannia Law Review 15(4): 1291–1327.

32.

Laing

Blair

(2013) Oscar Pistorius murder charge: South Africa’s gun culture. 14 February. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/9871156/Oscar-Pistorius-murder-charge-South-Africas-gun-culture.html (accessed 28 February 2013).

33.

Lambert

Pasupuleti

Jiang

Jaishankar

Bhimarasetty

(2012) Comparing and contrasting the formal and informal crime control views of Indian and U.S. college students: A preliminary study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 56(8): 1239–1257.

34.

Le Roux

(2010) Private defence: Strict conditions to be satisfied. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 73: 328–335.

35.

Loader

Walker

(2001) Policing as a public good: Reconstituting the connections between policing and the state. Theoretical Criminology 5(1): 9–35.

36.

Magar

(2003) Empowerment approaches to gender-based violence: Women’s courts in Delhi slums. Women’s Studies International Forum 26(6): 509–523.

37.

Melzer

(2009) Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s Culture War. New York: New York University Press.

38.

Mukherjee

Rustagi

Krishnaji

(2001) Crimes against women in India: Analysis of official statistics. Economic and Political Weekly 36(43): 4070–4080.

39.

National Association for Gun Rights India (NAGRI) ( 2012) National Association for Gun Rights India home page. Available at: http://www.gunowners.in/ (accessed 16 July 2012).

40.

New Age, The (2011) Gun licenses jammed up. 3 June. Available at: http://www.thenewage.co.za/19630-1007-53-Gun_licences_jammed_up (accessed 28 February 2013).

41.

O’Malley

(1992) Risk, power and crime prevention. Economy and Society 21(3): 252–275.

42.

O’Malley

(2002) Globalizing risk? Distinguishing styles of ‘neo-liberal’ criminal justice in Australia and the USA. Criminology and Criminal Justice 2: 205–222.

43.

Overdorf

Teng

(2010) India’s own Charlton Hestons. 20 December. Available at: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/india/101214/gun-culture-national-rifle-association-charlton-heston (accessed 5 January 2013).

44.

Peck

(2010) Zombie neoliberalism and the ambidextrous state. Theoretical Criminology 14(1): 104–110.

45.

Peck

Tickell

(2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3): 380–404.

46.

Podder

(2007) The politics of gun control and India’s internal security. Strategic Analysis 31(4): 675–687.

47.

Pow

C-P

(2013) Consuming private security: Consumer citizenship and defensive urbanism in Singapore. Theoretical Criminology 17(2): 179–196.

48.

Roberts

Struwig

(2011) SHOOTING BLANKS? South Africa’s confidence in police. HSRC Review. Available at: http://www.hsrc.ac.za/HSRC_Review_Article-262.phtml.

49.

Roychowdhury

(2013) The Delhi gang rape: The making of international causes. Feminist Studies 39(1): 282–292.

50.

Sahoo

(2008) Globalization, social welfare and civil society in India. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare 24(2): 133–141.

51.

Samara

(2010) Order and security in the city: Producing race and policing neoliberal space in South Africa. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33(4): 637–655.

52.

Sanchez

(2012) Questioning success: Dispossession and the criminal entrepreneur in urban India. Critique of Anthropology 32(4): 435–457.

53.

Schmitt

(2006) The Concept of the Political. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

54.

Shaban

(2008) Ghettoisation, crime and punishment in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly 43(33): 68–73.

55.

Shearing

Stenning

(1984) From the panopticon to Disney World: The development of discipline. In: Doob

Greenspan

(eds) Perspectives in Criminal Law. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, pp. 335–349.

56.

Simon

(2002) Guns, crime, and governance: A comment on Robert Weisberg’s Frankel lecture. Houston Law Review 39: 133–148.

57.

Simon

(2004) Gun rights and the constitutional significance of violent crime. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 12: 335–356.

58.

Simon

(2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.

59.

Simon

(2010) Consuming obsessions: Housing, homicide, and mass incarceration since 1950. University of Chicago Legal Forum 165: 141–180.

60.

Singh

A-M

(2005) Private security and crime control. Theoretical Criminology 9(2): 153–174.

61.

Storey

(2012) Guns, Race, and Power in Colonial South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

62.

Super

(2010) The spectacle of crime in the ‘New’ South Africa: A historical perspective (1976–2004). British Journal of Criminology 50: 165–184.

63.

Timmons

(2009) Security guards become the front lines in India. 2 March. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/business/worldbusiness/03security.html?_r=0 (accessed 28 February 2013).

64.

US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2012) Gun Control: States’ Laws and Requirements for Concealed Carry Permits Vary across the Nation. Washington, DC: GAO.

65.

Van Der Merwe

Du Plessis

(2004) Introduction to the Law of South Africa. The Hague: Kluer Law International.

66.

Wacquant

(2009a) Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

67.

Wacquant

(2009b) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

68.

Weinstein

(2008) Mumbai’s development mafias: Globalization, organized crime and land development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(1): 22–39.

69.

Weiss

(2007) From cowboy detectives to soldiers of fortune: Private security contracting and its contradictions on the new frontiers of capitalist expansion. Social Justice 34(3/4): 1–19.

70.

White

(2012) The new political economy of private security. Theoretical Criminology 16(1): 85–101.

71.

White

Gill

(2013) The transformation of policing: From ratios to rationalities. British Journal of Criminology 53: 74–93.

States,subjects and sovereign power: Lessons from global gun cultures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References