Abstract
Claims of ‘miracle cures’ for autism in the press and on the Internet bring new pressures to bear on parents of children with autism, and the professionals who care for them. Between a third and a half of people with autism in America are receiving some psychotropic medication. Despite recent advances in paediatric psychopharmacology, there is no proof that any medication can target the primary social impairments that characterize autism. The article discusses the evidence behind two approaches to psychopharmacological management in children with autism. The first approach selects certain target symptoms such as resistance to change, ritualistic/compulsive behaviours, hyperactivity, aggressive behaviours and sleep problems. The evidence for the effectiveness of agents including stimulants, anti- depressants, and melatonin when used to treat these symptoms is appraised. The second approach attempts to treat or cure the primary social impairment underlying autism. The evidence for the effectiveness of agents including naltrexone, fenfluramine and secretin is appraised. Early reports in this field have generated false hope, and the need for well-designed larger multicentre trials is emphasized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
