The present study investigated the effects of self-regulated strategy-based speaking instruction on English-as-a-foreign-language learners’ speaking performance and strategy use. Despite extensive research on self-regulated learning in various educational contexts, its application to second language speaking development remains underexplored. This explanatory mixed-methods quasi-experimental study employed self-report questionnaires, speaking assessments, and semi-structured interviews for data collection. A linear mixed-effects model results revealed that the experimental group (n = 54, receiving the self-regulated learning strategy-based intervention) demonstrated significantly greater improvement in speaking performance compared to the control group (n = 53, receiving traditional instruction), with effects sustained at delayed post-testing. Quantitative analyses further indicated significant increases in participants’ use of self-regulated learning strategies. Qualitative findings corroborated these results, revealing more frequent, deliberate, and sophisticated strategy application among intervention participants. Interview data also suggested differential intervention effects based on learners’ initial speaking proficiency levels. These findings underscore the efficacy of explicitly integrating self-regulated learning strategies into speaking instruction to enhance learner autonomy and speaking performance in English-as-a-foreign-language contexts.
AlghazoS. (2021). Pronunciation learning strategies used by EFL university students: A classroom-based investigation. In M.Pawlak (Ed.), Investigating individual learner differences in second language learning (pp. 151–171). Springer International Publishing.
2.
AnZ.WangC.LiS.GanZ.LiH. (2021). Technology-assisted self-regulated English language learning: Associations with English language self-efficacy, English enjoyment, and learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 558466. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558466
3.
Ben-EliyahuA.BernackiM. L. (2015). Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9134-6
ChamotA. U.HarrisD. V. (Eds.). (2019). Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation. Multilingual Matters.
6.
ChamotA. U.O’MalleyJ. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
CsizérK.TankóG. (2017). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv033
12.
DengC.CarlessD. R. (2010). Examination preparation or effective teaching: Conflicting priorities in the implementation of a pedagogic innovation. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2010.510899
13.
DerakhshanA.MalmirA.PawlakM.WangY. (2024). The use of interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) by L2 learners: The impact of age, gender, language learning experience, and L2 proficiency levels. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 1985–2008. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0132
14.
DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
15.
DörnyeiZ.ScottM. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.51997005
16.
DreyerC.OxfordR. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In OxfordR. L. (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives | NFLRC (pp. 62–74). Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/publications/view/tr13/
17.
EfklidesA. (2016). Metamemory and affect. In J. Dunlosky & S. (Uma) K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 245–267). Oxford University Press.
FaucetteP. (2001). A pedagogical perspective on communication strategies: Benefits of training and an analysis of English language teaching materials. Second Language Studies, 19, 1–40.
20.
GohC. C. M.BurnsA. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
21.
GrahamS.MacaroE. (2007). Designing Year 12 strategy training in listening and writing: From theory to practice. The Language Learning Journal, 35(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730701599203
22.
GriffithsC. (2010). Strategies of successful language learners. Journal of English Language Studies, 1(3), 1–18.
23.
GriffithsC.OxfordR. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, Language Learning Strategy Research in the Twenty-First Century: Insights and Innovations, 43, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.009
GuY. (2019). Approaches to learning strategy instruction. In ChamotA. U.HarrisV. (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp. 22–37). Multilingual Matters.
26.
GunningP.OxfordR. L. (2014). Children’s learning strategy use and the effects of strategy instruction on success in learning ESL in Canada. System, Language Learning Strategy Research in the Twenty-First Century: Insights and Innovations, 43, 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.012
27.
HabókA.MagyarA. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358
28.
HassanX.MacaroE.MasonD.NyeG.SmithP.VanderplankR. (2005). Strategy training in language learning-A systematic review of available research. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. https://oro.open.ac.uk/21243/
29.
HassanzadehM.RanjbarM. (2025). A mixed methods approach to exploring grammar learning strategies in self-regulation task phases: Evidence from grounded theory and regression analysis. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1286–1310. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221090825
30.
Hong-NamK.LeavellA. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002
31.
HuJ.GaoX. (Andy). (2018). Self-regulated strategic writing for academic studies in an English-medium-instruction context. Language and Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1373804
32.
HuangH.ChernC.LinC. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
33.
Kolić-VehovecS.BajšanskiI. (2007). Comprehension monitoring and reading comprehension in bilingual students. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00319.x
34.
KormosJ.CsizérK. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.129
35.
LanR.OxfordR. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. Language Learning Strategy Profiles of Elementary School Students in Taiwan, 41(4), 339–379. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.016
36.
LeeM.LeeS. Y.KimJ. E.LeeH. J. (2023). Domain-specific self-regulated learning interventions for elementary school students. Learning and Instruction, 88, 101810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101810
37.
LinL.LamW.-I.TseS. K. (2021). Motivational strategies, language learning strategies, and literal and inferential comprehension in second language Chinese reading: A structural equation modeling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 707538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707538
ManchónR. M.RocadeLariosJ.LizMurphy. (2007). A review of writing strategies: Focus on conceptualizations and impact of first language. In CohenA. D.MacaroE. (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 229–250). Oxford University Press.
40.
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
41.
NakahamaY.TylerA.Van LierL. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028
NakataniY.GohC. (2007). A review of oral communication strategies: Focus on interactionist and psycholinguistic perspectives. In CohenA. D.MacaroE. (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 207–227). Oxford University Press.
44.
NaughtonD. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00391.x
45.
NguyenL. T. C.GuY. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528
46.
NisbetD. L.TindallE. R.ArroyoA. A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02457.x
47.
O’MalleyJ. M.ChamotA. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
48.
OxfordR. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Publishers.
49.
OxfordR. L. (2011). Teaching and researching: Language learning strategies (1st ed.). Routledge.
50.
OxfordR. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.
51.
PawlakM. (2018a). Grammar learning strategy inventory (GLSI): Another look. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.8
52.
PawlakM. (2018b). Investigating the use of speaking strategies in the performance of two communicative tasks: The importance of communicative goal. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10/gr3pc3
53.
PawlakM. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819876156
54.
PawlakM.SzyszkaM. (2018). Researching pronunciation learning strategies: An overview and a critical look. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 293–323.
55.
PlatsidouM.KantaridouZ. (2014). The role of attitudes and learning strategy use in predicting perceived competence in school-aged foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Literature, 5, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2014/5-3/43
PlonskyL. (2019). Language learning strategy instruction: Recent research and future directions. In ChamotA. U.HarrisV. (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp. 3–21). Multilingual Matters.
58.
PlonskyL.OswaldF. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
59.
RaoZ. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: Interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.733886
60.
SatoM.LoewenS. (2018). Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68(2), 507–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12283
61.
SchunkD. H.ErtmerP. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Elsevier.
ShenB.BaiB. (2024). Enhancing Chinese university students’ writing performance and self-regulated learning (SRL) writing strategy use through a strategy-based intervention. System, 122, 103249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103249
64.
SkehanP. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
65.
SouvignierE.MokhlesgeramiJ. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006
66.
SunP. P. (2022). Strategic self-regulation for speaking English as a foreign language: Scale development and validation. TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3132
67.
SunP. P. (2023). The influence of cognitive, affective, and sociocultural individual differences on L2 Chinese speech performance: A multiple indicators multiple causes approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(1), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09847-x
68.
SunP. P.YangQ.HouX. (2023). New Zealand primary school students’ motivation and strategy use for learning Chinese-as-a-foreign-language. The Journal of Educational Research, 116(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2227846
69.
SunP. P.ZhangL. J.GrayS. M. (2016). Development and validation of the Speaking Strategy Inventory for Learners of Chinese (SSILC) as a second/foreign language. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0287-0
70.
SykesJ. M.CohenA. D. (2018). Strategies and interlanguage pragmatics: Explicit and comprehensive. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 381–402.
71.
SzyszkaM. (2021). Foreign language learners’ pronunciation learning beliefs and strategies. In PawlakM.(Ed.), Investigating individual learner differences in second language learning (pp. 189–205). Springer International Publishing.
72.
TaheriH.SadighiF.BagheriM. S.BavaliM. (2019). EFL learners’ L2 achievement and its relationship with cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, learning styles, and language learning strategies. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1655882. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1655882
73.
TengH.-C. (2012). A study on the teach ability of EFL communication strategies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3566–3570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.106
74.
TengL. S.YuanR. E.SunP. P. (2020). A mixed-methods approach to investigating motivational regulation strategies and writing proficiency in English as a foreign language contexts. System, 88, 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102182
75.
TengL. S.ZhangL. J. (2018). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4
76.
TengL. S.ZhangL. J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference?Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701
77.
TengL. S.ZhangL. J. (2022). Can self-regulation be transferred to second/foreign language learning and teaching? Current status, controversies, and future directions. Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab032
78.
TerhuneN. M. (2016). Language learning going global: Linking teachers and learners via commercial Skype-based CMC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1061020
79.
VandergriftL.GohC. C. M.MareschalC. J.TafaghodtariM. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
80.
van GelderenA.SchoonenR.de GlopperK.HulstijnJ.SimisA.SnellingsP.StevensonM. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.19
81.
WangY.SunP. P. (2024a). Development and validation of scales for speaking self-efficacy: Constructs, sources, and relations. PLoS One, 19(1), e0297517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297517
82.
WangY.SunP. P. (2024b). Development and validation of speaking strategies for self-regulated learning questionnaire (S3RLQ): A multidimensional approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33, 1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00807-0
83.
WoltersC. A.HussainM. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9128-9
84.
ZarandiS. Z. A.RahbarB. (2016). Enhancing speaking ability through intervening scaffolding strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2191–2195. https://doi.org/10.17507/TPLS.0611.17
85.
ZarrinabadiN.RezazadehM.ChehraziA. (2023). The links between grammar learning strategies and language mindsets among L2 and L3 learners: Examining the role of gender. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1871356
86.
ZhangL. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9025-6
87.
ZhangY.LiuL. (2018). Using computer speech recognition technology to evaluate spoken English. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5), 1341–1350.
88.
ZieglerN. A. (2014). Fostering self-regulated learning through the European language portfolio: An embedded mixed methods study. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 921–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12147
89.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 695–716). Academic Press.
90.
ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). Routledge.
91.
ZimmermanB. J.BanduraA. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
