A mixed methods approach to exploring grammar learning strategies in self-regulation task phases: Evidence from grounded theory and regression analysis

Abstract

While research into various dimensions of language learning strategies has been thriving over the recent years, grammar learning strategies (GLS) have largely remained under-explored. The present mixed methods research aimed to explore GLS in the three stages of classroom grammar tasks, while striving to determine the sequence of GLS and their contribution to grammar proficiency. In the qualitative phase, 13 participants partook in stimulated recall and semi-structured interviews after completing consciousness-raising (CR) tasks. Then, the grounded theory (GT) methodology was applied to conceptualize a theoretical model. For the quantitative phase, a modified version of Pawlak’s Grammar Learning Strategy Inventory and a grammar proficiency test were administered to 249 participants. The theoretical model of GT indicated that learners set goals and expected an outcome in the ‘forethought’ phase. Then, they employed strategies to pay attention to the form or meaning of the grammatical feature. Learners also attempted self-instruction by using facilitators in the ‘performance’ phase. Furthermore, their self-evaluation played an essential role in the ‘self-reflection’ phase. The results also indicated an interplay between the forethought and self-reflection phases, whereas the interaction between the performance phase and the other two phases appeared to be unidirectional. Additionally, it was revealed that GLS in the forethought and self-reflection phases as well as ‘total grammar strategy use’ significantly predicted grammar proficiency. The findings will serve classroom pedagogy via contributing to the body of knowledge about strategy instruction in general and GLS in particular.

Keywords

grammar learning strategies grounded theory language learning strategies mixed methods research multiple regression self-regulation task phases

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chamot

Harris

(Eds.). (2019). Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation. Multilingual Matters.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2nd edition. Sage.

Charmaz

Thornberg

(2020). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18, 305–327.

Cohen

(2021). Language learner strategies: A call for fine-tuned strategy categorization. In Gavriilidou

Mitits

(Ed.), Situating language learning strategy use (pp. 1–24). Multilingual Matters.

Cohen

A.D.

(2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Taylor & Francis.

Cohen

A.D.

Macaro

(2007). Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford University Press.

Creswell

J.W.

Clark

V.L.P.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd edition. Sage.

DeKeyser

(2017). Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In Loewen

Sato

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). Routledge.

DeVellis

R.F.

(2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. 3rd edition. Sage.

10.

Dörnyei

(2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Dörnyei

Ryan

(2015). The Psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.

12.

Droździał-Szelest

(1997). Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Motivex.

13.

Ellis

(2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

14.

Field

(2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd edition. Sage.

15.

Gass

S.M.

Mackey

(2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. 2nd edition. Routledge.

16.

Green

J.M.

Oxford

(1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261–297.

17.

Griffiths

(2018). The strategy factor in successful language learning: The tornado effect. 2nd edition. Multilingual Matters.

18.

Griffiths

(2020). Language learning strategies: Is the baby still in the bathwater? Applied Linguistics, 41, 607–611.

19.

Gürata

(2008). The grammar learning strategies employed by Turkish university preparatory school EFL students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

20.

Hadley

(2019). Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. Routledge.

21.

Hong-Nam

Leavell

A. G.

(2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34, 399–415.

22.

Loewen

Fei

, et al. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91–104.

23.

Mystkowska-Wiertelak

(2008). The use of grammar learning strategies of secondary school students. In Pawlak

(Ed.), Investigating English language learning and teaching (pp. 139–148). Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

24.

Nisbet

D. L.

Tindall

E. R.

Arroyo

A. A.

(2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 100–107.

25.

Oliphant

(1997). Acquisition of grammatical gender in Italian as a foreign language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 239–262.

26.

Oxford

R.L.

(1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury.

27.

Oxford

R.L.

(2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge.

28.

Oxford

(2021). Consciously keeping watch: Self-regulation and learning strategies. In Gavriilidou

Mitits

(Ed.), Situating language learning strategy use (pp. 25–34). Multilingual Matters.

29.

Oxford

R.L.

Amerstorfer

C.M.

(Eds.). (2019). Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts. Bloomsbury Academic.

30.

Oxford

R.L.

Burry-Stock

J.A.

(1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23, 1–23.

31.

Oxford

Cho

Leung

Kim

H.J.

(2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 1–47.

32.

Oxford

R.L.

Lee

R.L.

Park

. (2007). L2 grammar strategies: The second Cinderella and beyond. In Cohen

A.D.

Macaro

(Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 117–139). Oxford University Press.

33.

Pajares

Schunk

(2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In Riding

Rayner

(Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences (pp. 239–265). Ablex.

34.

Pawlak

(2008). Advanced learners’ use of strategies for learning grammar: A diary study. In Pawlak

(Ed.), Investigating English language learning and teaching (pp. 109–125). Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

35.

Pawlak

(2009). Grammar learning strategies and language attainment: Seeking a relationship. Research in Language, 7, 43–60.

36.

Pawlak

(2012). Instructional mode and the use of grammar learning strategies. In Pawlak

(Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 263–287). Springer.

37.

Pawlak

(2013). Researching grammar learning strategies: Combining the macro- and micro-perspective. In Szubko-Sitarek

Salski

Ł.

(Eds.), Perspectives on foreign language learning (pp. 193–211). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

38.

Pawlak

(2018a). Grammar learning strategy inventory (GLSI): Another look. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 351–379.

39.

Pawlak

(2018b). Investigating the use of speaking strategies in the performance of two communicative tasks: The importance of communicative goal. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 269–291.

40.

Pawlak

(2019). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25, 817–835.

41.

Pawlak

(2020). Grammar learning strategies as a key to mastering second language grammar: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 53, 358–370.

42.

Pawlak

. (2021). Exploring the interface between individual difference variables and the knowledge of second language grammar. Springer.

43.

Pawlak

Oxford

R.L.

(2018). Conclusion: The future of research into language learning strategies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 525–535.

44.

Purpura

J.E.

(2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge University Press.

45.

Purpura

J.E.

(2014). Language learner styles and strategies. In Celce-Murcia

Brinton

Snow

(Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 532–549). 4th edition. National Geographic Learning/Cengage.

46.

Rubin

(1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.

47.

Schmidt

(2001). Attention. In Robinson

(Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.

48.

Zarrinabadi

Rezazadeh

Chehrazi

(2021). The links between grammar learning strategies and language mindsets among L2 and L3 learners: Examining the role of gender. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1871356

49.

Zimmerman

B.J.

(2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41, 64–70.

50.

Zimmerman

B.J.

(2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB