From Class Crowds to Virtual Clouds: How does Cloud-Mediated Collaboration Resonate with EFL Learners’ Macro- and Micro-Writing Skills and Motivation?

Abstract

Transferring collaborative writing (CW) activities from in-class paper-based to online cloud-mediated collaboration, this study examined the comparative effects of these two CW contexts on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ macro- and micro-writing skills and motivation. For this purpose, a cohort (N = 54) of senior EFL college students was selected (using criterion-based purposive sampling) and then randomly assigned to two groups: paper-based collaboration (PC, n = 27) and cloud-based collaboration (CC, n = 27). Using a mixed-method design, the study employed both quantitative (expository and argumentative writing tests, and a motivation questionnaire) and qualitative (group and self-evaluation forms and reflection sheets) methods for data collection and analysis. Consequently, one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to compare students’ writing scores on both the macro-writing (content, organization, and style) and micro-writing (conventions and diction) skills. While cloud-mediated collaboration afforded surface micro-level accuracy and structural coherence, traditional paper-based group demonstrated equal and even superior capacity to foster deeper and higher-order cognitive processes of content development and stylistic expression. Similarly, face-to-face collaboration demonstrated equal intrinsic and extrinsic motivational drives compared to cloud collaboration which showed superior capacity in only self-efficacy and effort subscales. As such, the findings re-examine the long-held assumption that technology-enhanced CW uniformly outperforms traditional approaches in all writing constructs. This study proposes a diagnostic model that can assist EFL writing instructors, leading to more informed pedagogical decision-making processes: using cloud tools for streamlining linguistic accuracy and saving face-to-face interaction for augmenting higher-order cognitive processes needed for content development, organization, and stylistic nuances.

Keywords

cloud-mediated collaboration writing motivation macro-writing skills micro-writing skills

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambrose

Palpanathan

(2017). Investigating the effectiveness of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) using google documents in enhancing writing: A study on senior students in a Chinese independent high school. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.04

Barkley

Cross

Major

(2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Birjandi

Tamjid

N. H.

(2010). The role of self-assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ motivation. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p211

Blau

Caspi

(2009). What type of collaboration helps? Psychological ownership, perceived learning, and outcome quality of collaboration using Google Docs. In Eshet-Alkalai

Caspi

Eden

Geri

Yair

(Eds.), Learning in the technological era (pp. 48–55). Open University of Israel.

Brodahl

Hansen

(2014). Education students’ use of collaborative writing tools in collectively reflective essay papers. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.28945/1960

Brown

(2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Longman.

Cohen

(2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. L. P.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Curtis

(2013). Writing 2.0: Using google docs as a collaborative writing tool in the elementary classroom[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Utah Valley University, United States. http://contentdm.uvu.edu/utils/getfile/collection/UVUTheses/id/609/filename/610.pdf

10.

Dai

Wang

(2023). Exploring the effect of wiki-based writing instruction on writing skills and writing self-efficacy of Chinese English-as-a-foreign language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1069832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1069832

11.

Dizon

(2016). A comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369

12.

Dörnyei

(2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.

13.

Dörnyei

(2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53222

14.

Ebadi

Rahimi

(2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using google docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056

15.

Ebadijalal

Moradkhani

(2025). Impacts of computer-assisted collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual writing on EFL learners’ performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1–2), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2178463

16.

Elola

Oskoz

(2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44226

17.

Fahim

Mirzaii

(2014). Improving EFL argumentative writing: A dialogic critical thinking approach. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2013.313

18.

Farahian

Ebadi

(2023). Collaborative digital writing and metacognitive knowledge in writing among TEFL students: The mediating role of online knowledge sharing. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 5. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18005

19.

Fazel

Ahmadi

(2011). On the relationship between writing proficiency and instrumental/integrative motivation among Iranian IELTS candidates. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.7.747-757

20.

Gardner

(1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold Press.

21.

Guay

Chanal

Ratelle

Marsh

Larose

Boivin

(2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 711–735. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X499084

22.

Hafour

M. F.

(2024). Interactive digital media assignments: Effects on EFL learners’ overall and micro-level oral language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 986–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2067180

23.

Hafour

M. F.

Al-Rashidy

A. S. M.

(2020). Storyboarding-based collaborative narratives on Google Docs: Fostering EFL learners’ writing fluency, syntactic complexity, and overall performance. The JALT call Journal, 16(3), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v16n3.393

24.

Hauck

Youngs

B. L.

(2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer assisted language learning, 21(2), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220801943510

25.

Hemati

Farahian

(2024). Fostering EFL learners’ classroom engagement: Does collaborative writing through google docs make a difference? Technology Assisted Language Education, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5699203

26.

Hsu

H. C.

Y. F.

(2018). Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance. Language Learning and Technology, 22(3), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44659

27.

Jalili

Shahrokhi

(2017). The effect of collaborative writing on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 writing anxiety and attitudes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 203–215. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/download/538/pdf538

28.

Kessler

Bikowski

Boggs

(2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44276

29.

Kılınç

B. O.

Yüksel

H. G.

(2024). Online collaborative writing in an online EFL writing class. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19022

30.

Kim

Emeliyanova

(2021). The effects of written corrective feedback on the accuracy of L2 writing: Comparing collaborative and individual revision behavior. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831406

31.

Kitade

(2008). The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44131

32.

Mak

(2022). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students’ learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102712

33.

(2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981

34.

(2023). The effect of online collaborative writing instruction on enhancing writing performance, writing motivation, and writing self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1165221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165221

35.

Lin

Cheng

Lin

(2014). Development of a research article writing motivation inventory. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.164

36.

Lindberg

McDonough

Ammar

(2026). The sociocognitive functions of English use during L2 French collaborative writing tasks. Language Teaching Research, 30(2), 829–845.

37.

Liu

Lan

(2016). Social constructivist approach to web-based EFL learning: Collaboration, motivation, and perception on the use of google docs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 171–186.

38.

Lowry

Curtis

Lowry

(2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363

39.

Minocha

Thomas

(2007). Collaborative learning in a Wiki environment: Experiences from a software engineering course. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 13(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614560701712667

40.

Moonma

(2021). Comparing collaborative writing activity in EFL classroom: Face-to-Face collaborative writing versus online collaborative writing using google docs. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(4), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.74.204.215

41.

Nguyen

Oanh

(2025). Cooperative learning and its influences on student engagement. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2513414. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2513414

42.

Obeiah

Bataineh

(2016). The effect of portfolio-based assessment on Jordanian EFL learners’ writing performance. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 9(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.629

43.

Peng

Chen

Jiang

(2022). Effects of group awareness tools on students’ engagement, performance, and perceptions in online collaborative writing: Intergroup information matters. The Internet and Higher Education, 53, 100845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100845

44.

Pham

V. P. H.

Usaha

(2016). Blog-based peer response for L2 writing revision. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 724–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1026355

45.

Rahimi

Fathi

(2022). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2627–2674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753

46.

Ruth

(2024). EFL teacher beliefs about collaborative writing at Swedish primary school. Education Inquiry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2024.2408938

47.

Ryan

Deci

(2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

48.

Seyyedrezaie

Ghonsooly

Shahriari

Fatemi

(2016). Mixed methods analysis of the effect of google docs environment on EFL learners’ writing performance and causal attributions for success and failure. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 17, 90–110. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.34418

49.

Storch

(2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual review of applied linguistics, 31, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000079

50.

Suwantarathip

Wichadee

(2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2).

51.

Tanrıkulu

(2022). Students’ perceptions about the effects of collaborative digital storytelling on writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1090–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774611

52.

Vens

(2010). The suitableness of google documents as a student collaborative writing tool [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Iowa State University, United States.

53.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.

54.

Woodrich

Fan

(2017). Google docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.28945/3870

55.

Yesilyurt

(2008). Motivational patterns and achievement in EFL writing courses: An investigation from self-determination theory perspective. Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 135–154.

56.

Yuan-bing

(2011). How to motivate students in second language writing. Sino-US English Teaching, 8(4), 235–240.

57.

Zhang

(2022). A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 10–33.

58.

Zhang

Guo

(2013). A study of English writing and domain-specific motivation and self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 103–123.