Spoken communication remains limited in many Arabic-speaking university English as a foreign language (EFL) settings, where accuracy often outweighs experimentation. This study examines comparative repetition pedagogy (CRP), a bilingual instructional framework developed by Alshaikhi, integrating drama, role play, and task-based reflection. A longitudinal mixed-methods design was implemented with 120 male English-major students in Saudi Arabia. Quantitative data were collected through a willingness to communicate questionnaire, and qualitative data included observations, reflection logs, bilingual adaptations, and two semi-structured teacher interviews. Findings indicate increased willingness to communicate and emerging rhetorical awareness, though these patterns should be interpreted cautiously within the study’s contextual and sampling constraints. While the study does not claim transformative outcomes, CRP appears to create structured opportunities for bilingual reflection and performance. Further research is needed to examine its relevance across learner groups, languages, and institutional contexts.
AlhaysonyM. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.03
AlqahtaniA. (2022). Validating a CEFR-aligned English placement test for Saudi university students. Arab World English Journal, 13(4), 345–362.
4.
AlsagoafiA. (2025). Innovative translanguaging strategies in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative analysis of EFL Saudi teachers. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2552868
5.
AlshaikhiM. H. (2025). Comparative Repetition Pedagogy: Integrating drama, role play, and task-based learning in bilingual Arabic–English university EFL classrooms. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5168492
6.
AlshaikhiM. H. (2026). Collocational depth, L1 interference, and strategic engagement: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research. First published 30 March 2026. DOI:10.1177/13621688261435175
7.
AssmannJ. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306
8.
BlockD. (2018). The political economy of language education research (or the lack thereof): Nancy Fraser and the case of translanguaging. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(4), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2018.1466300
9.
BoersF.FaezF. (2026). Meta-analysis to estimate the relative effectiveness of TBLT programs: Are we there yet?Language Teaching Research, 30(3), 1525–1543. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231177490
British Council. (2021). Aligning English language education with the CEFR: Principles and practices. Author.
12.
CookV. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587680
13.
CookV. (2010). The relationship between first and second language acquisition revisited. In MacaroE. (Ed.), The Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 137–157). Continuum.
14.
CumminsJ. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221–240.
15.
DikilitaşK.ÖztüfekçiE. (2024). Translanguaging in English language classrooms: Teacher practices and learner engagement in higher education. System, 118, Article 103124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103124
16.
Effat University. (2020). English language placement and proficiency testing policy. Author.
17.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
18.
EllisR. (2024). Task-based and task-supported language teaching. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240401
FathiJ.RahimiM.DerakhshanA. (2024). Task-based speaking activities and willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms. System, 121, Article 103231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103231
21.
GaoX. (2018). Language learner agency: Policy, pedagogy and research. System, 74, 1–3.
22.
García MayoM. P. (2019). Learning in foreign language contexts: Insights from classroom interaction research. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819855377
KrashenS. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
28.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
29.
LaiC. (2017). Autonomous language learning with technology: Beyond the classroom. System, 65, 1–2.
30.
LantolfJ. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
31.
LorimerR. (2013). Writing across languages: Developing rhetorical attunement. In CanagarajahA. S. (Ed.), Literacy as translingual practice (pp. 162–169). Routledge.
32.
LuoS.IsmailL.binti AhmadN. K.GuoQ. (2024). Using process drama in EFL education: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(11), Article e31936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31936
33.
Melo-PfeiferS. (2024). Crossing linguistic and disciplinary boundaries? Linguistic practices in STEM classrooms, or how a multilingual habit does not make a multilingual monk. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2023.2232389
34.
MishlerE. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Harvard University Press.
35.
NassajiH. (2020). The importance of using multiple measures or data sources in L2 instructional research. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776999
36.
PengJ.-E.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x
37.
RababahG. (2018). Communication strategies in Arabic: A study of the strategies used by Arab learners of English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(6), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n6p62
38.
SabbahS. (2019). Repetition in Arabic discourse: Religious and poetic perspectives. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 1–20.
39.
StinsonM.WinstonJ. (2011). Drama education and second language learning: A growing field of practice and research. Research in Drama Education, 16(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2011.617104
40.
ThesenL. (2014). Risk as productive: Working with dilemmas in the writing of research. In ThesenL.CooperL. (Eds.), Risk in academic writing (pp. 1–24). Multilingual Matters.
TianZ.SchisselJ. L.YinC.-H.McConnellJ. W. (2025). Translanguaging for equity and justice in assessment: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(11), Article 1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111567
