Mastering lexical stress is a persistent challenge for second-language (L2) learners, particularly when first-language (L1) prosodic systems differ markedly from the target language. This study investigates how Arabic phonological patterns influence English stress assignment and evaluates the effectiveness of two explicit instructional approaches, ”contrastive phonological analysis” (CPA) and “auditory discrimination training” (ADT), for Arab English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. A total of 180 Jordanian 11th-grade learners completed perception and production tasks involving 50 disyllabic and polysyllabic English words representing five stress types. Acoustic features (pitch, duration, and intensity) were measured using Praat and judged for accuracy by native speakers. Results showed persistent L1 transfer, particularly default penultimate stress and reduced accuracy in morphologically complex forms. Both interventions led to significant improvement in perception and production, with CPA yielding greater gains on stress-ambiguous forms. A strong perception–production correlation (r = .72, p < .001) confirmed a transfer effect and delayed post-tests showed moderate retention. Findings highlight the role of prosodic transfer and support contrastive, perception-based instruction to improve stress competence among Arab learners.
Abu DarwishM.A.Al-RamahiR.Al SmaihyeenM.Al-ShamaylehT.AlmomniE.Al-OrainatL.A.M. (2023). Misplacement of stress by sophomore and junior Jordanian students: Case study, The University of Jordan/Aqaba. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 1019–1028.
2.
Al-AniS.H. (1970). Arabic phonology: An acoustical and physiological investigation. Mouton.
3.
Al-KhreshehM.H. (2024). Phonetic challenges in English: The impact of mispronunciation of the bilabial plosive /p/ on communication among Saudi EFL learners. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), Article 2390777. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2390777
4.
AlmbarkR.BouchhiouaN.HellmuthS. (2014). Acquiring the phonetics and phonology of English word stress: Comparing learners from different L1 backgrounds. In S. M. Lee & J. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (Vol. 5, pp. 19–35). Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics.
5.
Al-ShalabiF. (2021). Phonological errors and L1 interference: A case study of Jordanian learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Studies in Education, 11(3), 116–132.
6.
Al-TamimiJ.KhattabG. (2015). Acoustic cue weighting in the singleton vs geminate contrast in Lebanese Arabic: The case of fricative consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(1), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4922703
7.
Al ThalabH.S.A. (2021). English word stress production by Iraqi Arabic ESL learners: Reliance on the impact of stress position. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 28(8), 26–40.
8.
AltmannH. (2006). The perception and production of lexical stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.
9.
AmerM.M.AmerW.M. (2011). The role of explicit instruction in English word stress patterns in an EFL Arab university context. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 1–17.
10.
ArchibaldJ. (1998). Second language phonology. John Benjamins.
11.
ArchibaldJ. (2023). Phonological parsing via an integrated I-language: The emergence of property-by-property transfer effects in L3 phonology. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13(6), 743–766.
12.
Alzi’abiS. E. (2022). Arab EFL learners’ stress of compound words. Research in Language, 20(1), 85–108.
13.
Alzi’abiS. E. (2023). Arab learners’ stress perception and production of English multisyllable items. Journal of Experimental Phonetics, 32, 111–130.
14.
Alzi’abiS. E. (2025). On Arab EFL learners’ production of words with “-ate”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 26–55.
15.
BaagbahS.Y.JaganathanP. (2023). Word length and proficiency level effect on English lexical stress production by Arab EFL learners. International Journal of Language, Literacy and Translation, 6(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.36777/ijollt2023.6.2.084
16.
BaagbahS.Y.JaganathanP. (2024). Predictability effect of Arabic stress pattern in English lexical stress production by Arab EFL undergraduates. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 32(2), 535–661.
17.
BeckmanM.E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Foris.
18.
BestC.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(2), 2534–2535.
19.
BestC.T.TylerM.D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In MackM.C.LimaA.G.C.R. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
20.
BettiI.UlaiwiA. (2018). L1 transfer in L2 stress assignment: A study on Saudi ESL learners. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(3), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v6n3p12
21.
BirdsongD. (1987). A role for negative evidence in second language acquisition?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, CA. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED292358
22.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
23.
ChenH.C.HanQ.TianJ.X. (2025). The effects of rule-based and acoustic-perceptual instruction on Chinese ESL learners’ English primary word stress placement accuracy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 1149–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12687
24.
ChomskyN.HalleM. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row.
CutlerA. (2005). Lexical stress. In PisoniD.B.RemezR.E. (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 264–289). Blackwell.
27.
de GaravitoJ.B. (2019). The prosodic transfer hypothesis: Possible application to Spanish clitics. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9, 816–821.
28.
DeKeyserR. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
29.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.
30.
EllisN.C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.
31.
FabraL.R. (2016). Perception and production of L2 speech sounds: L1 phonetic/phonological categories do not tell it all. In A. M. Fernández Planas (Ed.), 53 reflexiones sobre aspectos de la fonética y otros temas de lingüística (pp. 419–425). Universidad de Barcelona.
32.
FieldJ. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487
33.
FlegeJ.E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 101–139). York Press.
34.
FlegeJ.E.MunroM.J.MacKayI.R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134.
35.
GarciaG.D.GuzzoN.B. (2022). Lexical access in Portuguese stress. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 21(7), 1–24.
36.
GrabowskiE. (2024). Acoustic measurement in phonetics: Current practices and future directions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
37.
GuionS.G.ClarkJ.J.HaradaT.WaylandR.P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English nonwords include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46(4), 403–426.
38.
GussenhovenR. (2004). The phonology of tone and accent. Cambridge University Press.
39.
HimmelmannN.P. (2023). On the comparability of prosodic categories: Why ‘stress’ is difficult. Linguistic Typology, 27(2), 341–361.
40.
IslamM.N. (2024). Understanding and teaching English word stress patterns: Approaches, challenges, and practical solutions for EFL/ESL instructors and learners. In A. Pedro (Ed.), An overview of literature, language and education research (Vol. 8, pp. 125–141). BP International.
41.
JarvisS.PavlenkoA. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.
42.
KijakA.M. (2009). How stressful is L2 stress? A cross-linguistic study of L2 perception and production of metrical systems. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University. LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).
43.
LacabexE.G.Gallardo del PuertoF. (2014). Two phonetic-training procedures for young learners: Investigating instructional effects on perceptual awareness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 500–531.
44.
LandisJ.R.KochG.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
45.
Larson-HallJ.HerringtonR. (2010). Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 368–390.
46.
LecumberriM.L.G. (2008). Perception of double stress by Spanish learners of English. In B. O. Baptista & M. A. Watkins (Eds.), English with a Latin Beat: Studies in Portuguese/Spanish–English Interphonology (pp. 185–198). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
47.
LewisG.DeterdingD. (2018). Phonological transfer in second language stress assignment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 198–214.
48.
LysterR.SaitoK. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990517
49.
MaghrabiR. (2021). A phonological study of the influence of Arabic stress on the pronunciation of English words by Saudi ESL learners. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, 73, 350–365.
50.
MajorR.C. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In Hansen EdwardsJ.G.ZampiniM.L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.
51.
MunroM.J.DerwingT.M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49(1), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8
52.
NationI.S.P. (2004). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
53.
OdlinT. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
54.
OdlinT. (2003). Crosslinguistic influence. In DoughtyC.LongM. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Blackwell.
55.
ÖzçelikÖ. (2019). The scope of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17044.ozc
56.
PaterJ. (2007). The L2 acquisition of English word stress. In BohnO.S.MunroM.J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 235–261). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
57.
PenningtonM.C.EllisN.C. (2000). Cantonese speakers’ memory for English sentences with prosodic cues. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 372–389.
58.
RasierL.HiligsmannP. (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2: Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 28, 41–66.
59.
RenJ.WangM. (2023). Sensitivity to word endings as probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress among English as second language learners. Memory & Cognition, 51(8), 1881–1897.
60.
RoachP. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
61.
RødA.J.CalafatoR. (2023). Exploring the relationship between extramural English, self-efficacy, gender, and learning outcomes: A mixed-methods study in a Norwegian upper-secondary school. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 79, 101302.
62.
Sadat-TehraniN. (2017). Teaching English stress: A case study. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 943–968.
63.
Sa’diR.A.SharadgahT.A.YaseenM.S. (2022). An investigation of common stress placement errors in English word roots and their suffixed derivatives by Arabic-speaking EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.4
64.
Schmidt-KassowM.GüntherA.-N.Salim-LatzelM.KaiserJ.PaulmannS. (2024). Perceived prolonged stress leads to difficulties in recognizing sadness from voice cues in men but not women. Emotion, 25(1), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001393.
65.
SchwabS.DellwoV. (2022). Explicit versus non-explicit prosodic training in the learning of Spanish L2 stress contrasts by French listeners. Journal of Second Language Studies, 5(2), 266–306. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21011.sch
66.
ShawJ.A.GafosA.I.HooleP.ZeroualC. (2011). Dynamic invariance in the phonetic expression of syllable structure: A case study of Moroccan Arabic consonant clusters. Phonology, 28(3), 455–490.
67.
TremblayA. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 553–584.
68.
TrofimovichP.BakerW. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013
69.
van LeussenJ.-W.EscuderoP. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000
70.
WatsonJ.C.E. (2011). Word stress in Arabic. In WeningerS. (Ed.), The Semitic languages: An international handbook (pp. 114–134). De Gruyter Mouton.
71.
WhiteL.GeneseeF. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12(3), 233–265.
72.
YavaşM. (2020). Applied English phonology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
73.
ZuraiqW.SerenoJ.A. (2007). English lexical stress cues in native English and non-native Arabic speakers. Ratio, 1(2), 829–832.
