Social class,generative AI,and the negotiation of unequal digital literacies

Abstract

Focusing on two Chinese female university students from contrasting social class positions, Chen and Natalia, this article explores how engaging with generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools built on large language models constitutes social practice that can reproduce inequalities in language learning. Drawing on Darvin and Norton’s model of investment, we examine how these learners invest in AI literacy practices (as a specific type of digital literacies) shaped by differing dispositions toward technology and unequal access to material and symbolic resources. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and digital artifacts, and analyzed using NVivo 12 following an inductive, case-based approach. Findings reveal that Chen, a middle-class student with extensive access to cultural, material, and social capital, was able to bypass barriers to entry and critically engage with ChatGPT. She agentively crafted targeted prompts and personalized chatbots, investing in the identity of a competent second language (L2) learner and AI user. In contrast, Natalia, a student from a small town in rural China, expressed a strong interest in AI but could only access 灵心AI (Lingxin AI), a third-party WeChat application powered by the ChatGLM model. Negotiating the material constraints of platforms, screen dimensions, memory capacity, and processing power, the two learners invested in contrasting digital literacies that ultimately offered unequal opportunities for English language learning. By shedding light on how social class creates unequal conditions for AI literacy practices, this study contributes to ongoing conversations about digital L2 learning, equity, and inclusion in an era of rapid technological change.

Keywords

AI divide AI literacies AI-mediated language learning digital literacies social class

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bentley

S. V.

Naughtin

C. K.

McGrath

M. J.

Irons

J. L.

Cooper

P. S.

(2024). The digital divide in action: How experiences of digital technology shape future relationships with artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics, 4, 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00452-3

Block

(2012). Class and SLA: Making connections. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811428418

Block

(2014). Social class in applied linguistics. Routledge.

Bourdieu

(1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035356

Braun

Clarke

(2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Celik

(2023). Exploring the determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Digital divide, computational thinking, cognitive absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 83, Article 102026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026

Chiu

T. K.

Ahmad

Ismailov

Sanusi

I. T.

(2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171

Darvin

(2018). Social class and the unequal digital literacies of youth. Language and Literacy, 20(3), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29407

Darvin

(2025a). Identity and investment in the age of generative AI. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190525100135

10.

Darvin

(2025b). Platformization, social media, and investing in unequal digital literacy practices. Applied Linguistics Review. Epub ahead of print 26 September 2025. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2025-0217

11.

Darvin

Hafner

C. A.

(2022). Digital literacies in TESOL: Mapping out the terrain. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 865–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3161

12.

Darvin

Norton

(2014). Social class, identity, and migrant students. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 13(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2014.901823

13.

Darvin

Norton

(2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191

14.

Darvin

Norton

(2019). Identity. In Schwieter

Benati

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 451–474). Cambridge University Press.

15.

Darvin

Norton

(2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000057

16.

Kamenova

(2023). China’s new regulations on generative AI: Implications for bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(10), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2249854

17.

Duff

(2018). Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge.

18.

Gee

J. P.

(2000). Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 412–420. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40017078

19.

Godwin-Jones

(2024). Distributed agency in language learning and teaching through generative AI. Language Learning and Technology, 28(2), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73570

20.

Hafner

C. A.

Chik

Jones

R. H.

(2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 19(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10125/44426

21.

Heath

S. B.

Street

B. V.

(2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.

22.

Jin

Tangsrivimol

J. A.

Darzi

, et al. (2025). DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Prospects and challenges. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1576992. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1576992

23.

Jones

R. H.

Hafner

C. A.

(2021). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Routledge.

24.

Knoth

Tolzin

Janson

Leimeister

J. M.

(2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225

25.

Kohnke

Moorhouse

B. L.

Zou

(2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

26.

Liu

(2025a). Interrogating critical digital literacies in the Chinese context: Insights from an ethnographic case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(7), 1695–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2241859

27.

Liu

(2025b). To transform or not to transform: Understanding the digital literacies of rural Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 24(4), 928–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2236217

28.

Liu

Darvin

(2024). From rural China to the digital wilds: Negotiating digital repertoires to claim the right to speak online. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 334–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3233

29.

Liu

(2024). Measuring EFL learners’ acceptance of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovations in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 152–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316

30.

Liu

G. L.

(2025c). Digital empowerment for rural migrant students in China: Identity, investment, and digital literacies beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 37(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344024000302

31.

Liu

G. L.

Darvin

(2024). Unpacking the role of motivation and enjoyment in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation in the Chinese context. Computers in Human Behaviors, 160, Article 108362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108362

32.

Liu

G. L.

Darvin

(2025). Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(7), 1632–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288

33.

Liu

G. L.

Zhao

(2026). A Scoping Review of AI-mediated informal language learning: Mapping out the terrain and identifying future directions. ReCALL, 38(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025100359

34.

Lutz

(2019). Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.140

35.

D. T. K.

Leung

J. K. L.

Chu

S. K. W.

Qiao

M. S.

(2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

36.

North

Snyder

Bulfin

(2008). Digital tastes: Social class and young people’s technology use. Information, Communication and Society, 11(7), 895–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802109006

37.

Norton

(2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.

38.

Postigo

(2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media and Society, 18(2), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541527

39.

Ragnedda

(2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge.

40.

Ritzer

Jurgenson

(2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673

41.

Rudolph

Tan

(2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23

42.

Sampanthar

Vitanova

(2023, April). How to leverage your skills in the post-knowledge AI economy. The World Economic Forum. Available online at: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/04/how-to-leverage-skills-in-post-knowledge-ai-economy (accessed April 2026).

43.

Soyoof

Gee

J. P.

Liu

G. L.

(2025). From tools to discourses: In conversation with James Paul Gee on literacy and artificial intelligence. RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251355879

44.

Street

B. V.

(1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

45.

D. T. K.

Chu

S. K. W.

(2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124

46.

Tareva

Razumovskaya

Guile

(2022). Post-knowledge economy and lifelong language learning: New agendas and issues. In Kononova

Kersh

Dobrydina

(Eds.), Adult English language teaching: Transformation through lifelong learning (pp. 1–24). Springer.

47.

Van Dijk

J. A. G. M

. (2017). Digital divide: Impact of access. In Rössler

Hoffner

C. A.

Zoonen

(Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of media effects (pp. 1–11). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764

48.

Vandrick

(2014). The role of social class in English language education. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 13(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2014.901819

49.

Warschauer

(2010). Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 123–140). Palgrave Macmillan.

50.

Weninger

(2023). Digital literacy as ideological practice. ELT Journal, 77(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad001